[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pop/procee/v9y2021p259-276.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factori cheie si provocari privind guvernanta inteligenta si rolul autoritatilor publice in dezvoltarea ecosistemelor de inovare urbana in cadrul modelului Cvadruplu Helix

Author

Listed:
  • Ani MATEI

    (Școala Națională de Studii Politice și Administrative ( SNSPA), București, România)

  • Elena Alexandra DOBRE

    (Școala Națională de Studii Politice și Administrative (SNSPA), București, România)

Abstract
Studiile recente au acordat o atentie crescanda oraselor smart si guvernantei inteligente, care impreuna cu politicile de inovare conduc la ecosisteme de inovare urbana si, de asemenea, au analizat colaborarea existenta intre actorii din cadrul ecosistemele urbane de inovare, in special datorita cererii tot mai mari de orase inteligente, guvernanta inteligenta, inovatii si implementarea acestora in cadrul ecosistemului urban inteligent. In plus, schimbarea paradigmei de la modelul Triplu Helix la modelul Cvadruplu Helix a determinat necesitatea unor cercetari mai aprofundate asupra colaborarii dintre actori, a factorilor de succes si, de asemenea, a provocarilor intalnite pentru asigurarea unei guvernante urbane inteligente. Un cadru pentru guvernanta urbana inteligenta este propus pe baza celor trei componente cheie impletite, si anume: componente teritoriale, institutionale si tehnologice. Aceasta cercetare si-a propus sa analizeze perceptiile actorilor implicati printr-un studiu calitativ, concentrandu-se in principal pe rolul autoritatile publice si colaborarea acestora cu ceilalti actori, pentru a ilustra modul in care functioneaza acest cadru in practica. Atat analiza literaturii de specialitate, cat si cercetarea calitativa au recunoscut necesitatea unor investigatii aprofundate pentru a intreprinde colaborari eficiente pentru dezvoltarea ecosistemelor urbane smart de inovare si pentru a depasi eventualele probleme emergente. Totodata, s-a observat ca guvernanta urbana inteligenta promoveaza o modalitate de guvernanta a oraselor deopotriva incluziva dar si inovatoare in era inteligenta, pornind de la problema urbana/ necesitatea de inovare, promovand moduri de guvernare bazate pe cerere si modeland ecosistemele urbane inovatoare astfel incat sa fie orientate catre societate. In plus, colaborarea dintre actori trebuie imbunatatita. Contributiile articolului sunt: (1) imbunatatirea conexiunii dintre mediul universitar, mediul privat, autoritati/institutii publice si societate civila (actorii in cadrul abordarii Cvadruplu Helix); (2) stabilirea perceptiei reale a partilor implicate in Cvadruplu Helix, cu accent pe punctele forte, punctele slabe si tensiunile care decurg din colaborarea lor.

Suggested Citation

  • Ani MATEI & Elena Alexandra DOBRE, 2021. "Factori cheie si provocari privind guvernanta inteligenta si rolul autoritatilor publice in dezvoltarea ecosistemelor de inovare urbana in cadrul modelului Cvadruplu Helix," Smart Cities International Conference (SCIC) Proceedings, Smart-EDU Hub, Faculty of Public Administration, National University of Political Studies & Public Administration, vol. 9, pages 259-276, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:pop:procee:v:9:y:2021:p:259-276
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.scrd.eu/index.php/scic/article/view/371/336
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.scrd.eu/index.php/scic/article/view/371
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huaxiong Jiang & Stan Geertman & Patrick Witte, 2020. "A Sociotechnical Framework for Smart Urban Governance: Urban Technological Innovation and Urban Governance in the Realm of Smart Cities," International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), IGI Global, vol. 9(1), pages 1-19, January.
    2. Etzkowitz, Henry & Leydesdorff, Loet, 2000. "The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and "Mode 2" to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 109-123, February.
    3. Simon Joss & Frans Sengers & Daan Schraven & Federico Caprotti & Youri Dayot, 2019. "The Smart City as Global Discourse: Storylines and Critical Junctures across 27 Cities," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 3-34, January.
    4. Huaxiong Jiang & Stan Geertman & Patrick Witte, 2020. "Avoiding the planning support system pitfalls? What smart governance can learn from the planning support system implementation gap," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(8), pages 1343-1360, October.
    5. Amal Ben Rjab & Sehl Mellouli, 2021. "Smart Cities in the Era of Artificial Intelligence and Internet of Things: Promises and Challenges," Public Administration and Information Technology, in: Elsa Estevez & Theresa A. Pardo & Hans Jochen Scholl (ed.), Smart Cities and Smart Governance, chapter 12, pages 259-288, Springer.
    6. LEBRUMENT, Norbert & ZUMBO-LEBRUMENT, Cédrine & ROCHETTE, Corinne & ROULET, Thomas J., 2021. "Triggering participation in smart cities: Political efficacy, public administration satisfaction and sense of belonging as drivers of citizens’ intention," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    7. Elias G. Carayannis & David F.J. Campbell, 2010. "Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and How Do Knowledge, Innovation and the Environment Relate To Each Other? : A Proposed Framework for a Trans-disciplinary Analysis of Sustainable Dev," International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development (IJSESD), IGI Global, vol. 1(1), pages 41-69, January.
    8. Carla Marques & Ana Vanessa Marques & Vitor Braga & Vanessa Ratten, 2021. "Technological transfer and spillovers within the RIS3 entrepreneurial ecosystems: a quadruple helix approach," Knowledge Management Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 127-136, January.
    9. Kumar, Harish & Singh, Manoj Kumar & Gupta, M.P. & Madaan, Jitendra, 2020. "Moving towards smart cities: Solutions that lead to the Smart City Transformation Framework," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    10. Marsal-Llacuna, Maria-Lluïsa & Colomer-Llinàs, Joan & Meléndez-Frigola, Joaquim, 2015. "Lessons in urban monitoring taken from sustainable and livable cities to better address the Smart Cities initiative," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 90(PB), pages 611-622.
    11. Appio, Francesco Paolo & Lima, Marcos & Paroutis, Sotirios, 2019. "Understanding Smart Cities: Innovation ecosystems, technological advancements, and societal challenges," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 1-14.
    12. Appio, Francesco Paolo & Lima, Marcos & Paroutis, Sotirios, 2019. "Understanding Smart Cities: Innovation ecosystems, technological advancements, and societal challenges," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 1-14.
    13. Bryan Campbell, 2010. "Environment And Sustainable Development," CIRANO Papers 2010n-04speciala, CIRANO.
    14. Magnus Yngvi Josefsson & Runolfur Smari Steinthorsson, 2021. "Reflections on a SMART urban ecosystem in a small island state: the case of SMART Reykjavik," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 42(1/2), pages 93-114.
    15. Erico Przeybilovicz & Maria Alexandra Cunha, 2021. "Government Characteristics to Achieve Smart Urban Governance: From Internal to External Transformation," Public Administration and Information Technology, in: Elsa Estevez & Theresa A. Pardo & Hans Jochen Scholl (ed.), Smart Cities and Smart Governance, chapter 3, pages 43-66, Springer.
    16. Paul Pierce & Francesca Ricciardi & Alessandro Zardini, 2017. "Smart Cities as Organizational Fields: A Framework for Mapping Sustainability-Enabling Configurations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-21, August.
    17. Zsuzsanna Tomor & Albert Meijer & Ank Michels & Stan Geertman, 2019. "Smart Governance For Sustainable Cities: Findings from a Systematic Literature Review," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4), pages 3-27, October.
    18. Seng Boon Lim & Jalaluddin Abdul Malek & Tan Yigitcanlar, 2021. "Post-Materialist Values of Smart City Societies: International Comparison of Public Values for Good Enough Governance," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-13, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaoran Zheng & Yuzhuo Cai, 2022. "Transforming Innovation Systems into Innovation Ecosystems: The Role of Public Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-26, June.
    2. Rallou Taratori & Paulina Rodriguez-Fiscal & Marie Abigail Pacho & Sesil Koutra & Montserrat Pareja-Eastaway & Dimitrios Thomas, 2021. "Unveiling the Evolution of Innovation Ecosystems: An Analysis of Triple, Quadruple, and Quintuple Helix Model Innovation Systems in European Case Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-20, July.
    3. Raul Gouvea & Shihong Li, 2022. "Smart Nations for All, Disability and Jobs: A Global Perspective," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(2), pages 1635-1650, June.
    4. Nicos Komninos & Christina Kakderi & Luca Mora & Anastasia Panori & Elena Sefertzi, 2022. "Towards High Impact Smart Cities: a Universal Architecture Based on Connected Intelligence Spaces," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(2), pages 1169-1197, June.
    5. Linde, Lina & Sjödin, David & Parida, Vinit & Wincent, Joakim, 2021. "Dynamic capabilities for ecosystem orchestrationA capability-based framework for smart city innovation initiatives," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    6. Maria Vincenza Ciasullo & Orlando Troisi & Mara Grimaldi & Daniele Leone, 2020. "Multi-level governance for sustainable innovation in smart communities: an ecosystems approach," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 1167-1195, December.
    7. Elias G. Carayannis & David F. J. Campbell, 2021. "Democracy of Climate and Climate for Democracy: the Evolution of Quadruple and Quintuple Helix Innovation Systems," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(4), pages 2050-2082, December.
    8. Morena Paulišić & Ana Čuić Tanković & Manuela Hrvatin, 2016. "Managing the service concept in creating an innovative tourism product," Tourism and Hospitality Industry 18, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality Management.
    9. Loet Leydesdorff & Han Woo Park & Balazs Lengyel, 2014. "A routine for measuring synergy in university–industry–government relations: mutual information as a Triple-Helix and Quadruple-Helix indicator," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 99(1), pages 27-35, April.
    10. Farshad Momeni & Ali Arab Mazar Yazdi & Seyed Mohammad Sajjad Najafi, 2019. "Changing economic systems and institutional dimensions of the Triple Helix model," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-12, December.
    11. Tomasi Sabrina & Cavicchi Alessio & Aleffi Chiara & Paviotti Gigliola & Ferrara Concetta & Baldoni Federica & Passarini Paolo, 2021. "Civic universities and bottom-up approaches to boost local development of rural areas: the case of the University of Macerata," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 9(1), pages 1-23, December.
    12. Elias G. Carayannis & David F. J. Campbell & Evangelos Grigoroudis, 2021. "Democracy and the Environment: How Political Freedom Is Linked with Environmental Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-15, May.
    13. Humberto Merritt, 2015. "The Role of Human Capital in University-Business Cooperation: The Case of Mexico," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 6(3), pages 568-588, September.
    14. Noriko Yoda & Kenichi Kuwashima, 2020. "Triple Helix of University–Industry–Government Relations in Japan: Transitions of Collaborations and Interactions," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 11(3), pages 1120-1144, September.
    15. Björn Sautter, 2021. "Shaping Digital Ecosystems for Sustainable Production: Assessing the Policy Impact of the 2030 Vision for Industrie 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-16, November.
    16. Peter Björk, 2014. "The DNA of Tourism Service Innovation: A Quadruple Helix Approach," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 5(1), pages 181-202, March.
    17. El Barachi, May & Salim, Taghreed Abu & Nyadzayo, Munyaradzi W. & Mathew, Sujith & Badewi, Amgad & Amankwah-Amoah, Joseph, 2022. "The relationship between citizen readiness and the intention to continuously use smart city services: Mediating effects of satisfaction and discomfort," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    18. Mary Schoonmaker & Elias Carayannis, 2013. "Mode 3: A Proposed Classification Scheme for the Knowledge Economy and Society," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 4(4), pages 556-577, December.
    19. Marvello Yang & Norizan Jaafar & Abdullah Al Mamun & Anas A. Salameh & Noorshella Che Nawi, 2022. "Modelling the significance of strategic orientation for competitive advantage and economic sustainability: the use of hybrid SEM–neural network analysis," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-28, December.
    20. Malin Lindberg & Monica Lindgren & Johann Packendorff, 2014. "Quadruple Helix as a Way to Bridge the Gender Gap in Entrepreneurship: The Case of an Innovation System Project in the Baltic Sea Region," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 5(1), pages 94-113, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    oraşe inteligente; guvernanţă urbană inteligentă; inovare; inovare urbană; colaborare actori cheie;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O35 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Social Innovation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pop:procee:v:9:y:2021:p:259-276. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Professor Catalin Vrabie (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fasnsro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.