[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/osi/bulimm/v23y2023p173-192.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison Of Critical Transportation Infrastructure Of Food Supply In Hungary And Germany – Identifying Key Stakeholders

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Freund

    (Corvinus University of Budapest, Hungary)

  • Zsofia Jambor

    (Corvinus University of Budapest, Hungary)

  • Judit Nagy

    (Corvinus University of Budapest, Hungary)

Abstract
The pandemic caused by Covid 19, and the emergence of the Russian-Ukrainian war conflict have generated global implications, but primarily threats the stability in the European context. The key focus of this study is on the critical infrastructures (CI) and how a disruption in it can challenge the stakeholders of the food supply. Critical infrastructures are those systems that provide essential services to society (see defence, management of the economy, public health, and security of people), the failure or even their destruction would have a serious impact on the sustainability of the fundamental infrastructures of a country. The methodology applied is the exploration of the literature and available secondary data about critical infrastructures in Hungary and Germany as well as stakeholder mapping. The aim of this conceptual paper is to identify key stakeholders in case of a disruption in the critical infrastructure relevant for the food supply, especially focusing on the transportation related CI when studying Hungarian and German practices. The findings are compared based on the strong economical dependency of the two countries. Main finding of the study is that a model was used to categorize food supply stakeholders into 4 categories (supportive, marginal, mixed blessing, non-supportive). This categorization along 2 dimensions (stakeholder's potential for threat FSC's CI and stakeholder's potential for cooperation with FSC in CI) was developed and carries an important message for policy makers about who and in what processes can be involved in case of disruption. The research limitations include the number of examined critical infrastructures and the possibility of non-reachable information connected to topic hidden by the governments. The authors aim to continue the research and involve more European countries to the analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Freund & Zsofia Jambor & Judit Nagy, 2023. "Comparison Of Critical Transportation Infrastructure Of Food Supply In Hungary And Germany – Identifying Key Stakeholders," Business Logistics in Modern Management, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Economics, Croatia, vol. 23, pages 173-192.
    • Handle: RePEc:osi:bulimm:v:23:y:2023:p:173-192
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.efos.unios.hr/repec/osi/bulimm/PDF/BusinessLogisticsinModernManagement23/blimm2310.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Derek Walker & Lynda Margaret Bourne & Arthur Shelley, 2008. "Influence, stakeholder mapping and visualization," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(6), pages 645-658.
    2. Katarzyna Styk & Paweł Bogacz, 2022. "A Method for Stakeholder Mapping in Connection with the Implementation of a Development Project," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-22, February.
    3. Aude Zingraff-Hamed & Frank Hüesker & Gerd Lupp & Chloe Begg & Josh Huang & Amy Oen & Zoran Vojinovic & Christian Kuhlicke & Stephan Pauleit, 2020. "Stakeholder Mapping to Co-Create Nature-Based Solutions: Who Is on Board?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-23, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thanne Mafaziya Nijamdeen & Jean Huge & Hajaniaina Ratsimbazafy & Kodikara Arachchilage Sunanda Kodikara & Farid Dahdouh-Guebas, 2022. "A social network analysis of mangrove management stakeholders in Sri Lanka's Northern Province," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/349602, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    2. Gerd Lupp & Aude Zingraff-Hamed & Josh J. Huang & Amy Oen & Stephan Pauleit, 2020. "Living Labs—A Concept for Co-Designing Nature-Based Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-22, December.
    3. Zhengqi He & Dechun Huang & Changzheng Zhang & Junmin Fang, 2018. "Toward a Stakeholder Perspective on Social Stability Risk of Large Hydraulic Engineering Projects in China: A Social Network Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, April.
    4. Ahmad Salman & Mastura Jaafar & Diana Mohamad & Mana Khoshkam, 2023. "Understanding Multi-stakeholder Complexity & Developing a Causal Recipe (fsQCA) for achieving Sustainable Ecotourism," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(9), pages 10261-10284, September.
    5. Claudia Shantal Moreno & Rosa Maria Roman-Cuesta & Steven W. J. Canty & Jorge Herrera & Claudia Teutli & Aarón Israel Muñiz-Castillo & Melanie McField & Melina Soto & Cibele do Amaral & Steven Paton &, 2022. "Stakeholders’ Perceptions of Nature-Based Solutions for Hurricane Risk Reduction Policies in the Mexican Caribbean," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-25, September.
    6. William Jones & Mahesh Sooriyabandara & Mike Yearworth & Angela Doufexi & R. Eddie Wilson, 2016. "Planning For 5G: A Problem Structuring Approach for Survival in the Telecoms Industry," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(4), pages 301-321, July.
    7. Konstantina Katsela & Michael Browne, 2019. "Importance of the Stakeholders’ Interaction: Comparative, Longitudinal Study of Two City Logistics Initiatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-17, October.
    8. Víctor Muñoz Sanz & Sara Romero Muñoz & Teresa Sánchez Chaparro & Lorena Bello Gómez & Tanja Herdt, 2022. "Making Green Work: Implementation Strategies in a New Generation of Urban Forests," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 202-213.
    9. Berardi, Umberto, 2013. "Stakeholders’ influence on the adoption of energy-saving technologies in Italian homes," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 520-530.
    10. Nathalie Nunes & Emma Björner & Knud Erik Hilding-Hamann, 2021. "Guidelines for Citizen Engagement and the Co-Creation of Nature-Based Solutions: Living Knowledge in the URBiNAT Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-37, December.
    11. Nuccio Ludovico & Federica Dessi & Marino Bonaiuto, 2020. "Stakeholders Mapping for Sustainable Biofuels: An Innovative Procedure Based on Computational Text Analysis and Social Network Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-22, December.
    12. Md. Mashiur Rahman & Madad Ali & Naveed Malik & Muhammad Salman Ahmad & Fahad Asmi, 2017. "Essential Skills for Project Stakeholders Identification: Sustainability Perspective," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 7(8), pages 43-55, August.
    13. Feyisetan Leo-Olagbaye & Henry Odeyinka & Pavithra Rathnasiri, 2023. "Stakeholders’ Roles in the Delivery of Sustainable Housing Projects in Lagos State, Nigeria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-22, July.
    14. Diego F. Uribe & Isabel Ortiz-Marcos & Ángel Uruburu, 2018. "What Is Going on with Stakeholder Theory in Project Management Literature? A Symbiotic Relationship for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-23, April.
    15. Marco De Nigris & Francesca Giuliano, 2023. "The Role of Organised Civil Society in the Implementation of the Renewable Energy Transition and Renewable Energy Communities: A Qualitative Assessment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-27, May.
    16. Kristijan Robert Prebanić & Mladen Vukomanović, 2021. "Realizing the Need for Digital Transformation of Stakeholder Management: A Systematic Review in the Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-27, November.
    17. Aude Zingraff-Hamed & Mathieu Bonnefond & Sebastien Bonthoux & Nicolas Legay & Sabine Greulich & Amélie Robert & Vincent Rotgé & José Serrano & Yixin Cao & Raita Bala & Alvin Vazha & Rebecca E. Tharme, 2021. "Human–River Encounter Sites: Looking for Harmony between Humans and Nature in Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-20, March.
    18. Yawson, Robert M. & Greiman, Bradley, 2014. "Stakeholder Analysis as a Tool for Systems Approach Research in HRD," MPRA Paper 61278, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Anne Bridget Lane & Bree Devin, 2018. "Operationalizing Stakeholder Engagement in CSR: A Process Approach," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(3), pages 267-280, May.
    20. Bhatt, Brijesh & Singh, Anoop, 2020. "Stakeholders’ role in distribution loss reduction technology adoption in the Indian electricity sector: An actor-oriented approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osi:bulimm:v:23:y:2023:p:173-192. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Davor Dujak,PhD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/efosihr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.