[go: up one dir, main page]

IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mth/ijssr8/v3y2015i1p190-201.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Damages and Compensation in Case of Breach of Contract

Author

Listed:
  • Mustafa Rashid Issa
Abstract
The CAS in the “Matuzalem case” determined the positive interest, the player has to compensate more than the damages which the former club actually suffered. The CAS deliberately chooses for the calculation of the indemnity a method which is unforeseeable for the football player. The European Court of Justice held in this decision that an indemnity for damages can only be calculated based on fixed criteria, i.e. criteria that are known. However, the approach of the CAS is contrary to the principle that the damage suffered is to be concretely calculated and that an indemnity may not contain any deterrent or punishing elements. According to the principles of Swiss tort law the reimbursement of damages is limited to the extent it can be expected within the usual course of affairs and the general experience of life that such damages are suitable to cause damages of the kind that actually occurred. The calculation of the compensation is to be based on the difference between the terminated and the new player’s contract as well as under consideration of a compensation for acquisition costs of the former club which have not been fully amortized due to the early termination of the contract. This seems to be the one and only adequate solution to achieve the balance between the contractual stability and the freedom of movement for players, which is actually the purpose of the FIFA regulations.

Suggested Citation

  • Mustafa Rashid Issa, 2015. "Damages and Compensation in Case of Breach of Contract," International Journal of Social Science Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 3(1), pages 190-201, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:mth:ijssr8:v:3:y:2015:i:1:p:190-201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ijssr/article/view/6852/6035
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ijssr/article/view/6852
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mth:ijssr8:v:3:y:2015:i:1:p:190-201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Technical Support Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ijssr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.