[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/postke/v28y2005i1p83-102.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technological innovation: Galbraith, the Post Keynesians, and a heterodox future

Author

Listed:
  • JERRY COURVISANOS
Abstract
Galbraith, in his work on The New Industrial State, provides the crucial institutional base from which to appreciate corporate technological innovation. This approach is modified by the work of other institutional writers in the context of changing industrial realities, including the rise of start-up entrepreneurs. Post Keynesians have developed a monopoly capitalist research agenda that implies certain important elements of human agency that institutionalists have left unstated. Finally, this paper sketches important elements of a future heterodox analytical framework on innovation that incorporates Galbraithian and Post Keynesian features for understanding corporate business strategy and public policy management.

Suggested Citation

  • Jerry Courvisanos, 2005. "Technological innovation: Galbraith, the Post Keynesians, and a heterodox future," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 83-102.
    • Handle: RePEc:mes:postke:v:28:y:2005:i:1:p:83-102
    DOI: 10.1080/01603477.2005.11051468
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01603477.2005.11051468
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01603477.2005.11051468?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    RePEc Biblio mentions

    As found on the RePEc Biblio, the curated bibliography for Economics:
    1. > Economic Development Technological Change, and Growth > Management of Technological Innovation and R&D

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adem LEVENT, 2016. "Power, Market and Techno-Structure in John Kenneth Galbraith’s Thought," Journal of Social and Administrative Sciences, KSP Journals, vol. 3(2), pages 214-218, June.
    2. Marco A. Crocco, 2008. "Technical Change And Formation Of Expectations," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(2), pages 276-304, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:postke:v:28:y:2005:i:1:p:83-102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MPKE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.