[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orisre/v35y2024i3p917-935.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On Crafting Effective Theoretical Contributions for Empirical Papers in Economics of Information Systems: Some Editorial Reflections

Author

Listed:
  • Anandasivam Gopal

    (Nanyang Business School, Nanyang Technological University, 639956 Singapore)

  • Pei-yu Chen

    (W. P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287)

  • Wonseok Oh

    (College of Business, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon 02455, Korea)

  • Sean Xin Xu

    (School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Suprateek Sarker

    (McIntire School of Commerce, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22903)

Abstract
The terms theory and theoretical contributions evoke mixed reactions in the information systems discipline, especially among empirical researchers in the economics of information systems (Econ-IS) area. Although some see such contributions as the raison d’etre for academic scholars engaged in research, others feel that the discipline has developed a fetish for theory, with reviewers and editors often demanding an unreasonable level of theoretical contributions for empirical manuscripts to succeed in the review process. Moreover, there exists a great deal of diversity in the conception of what constitutes a reasonable theoretical contribution, especially within empirical work, across editors and reviewers, leading to frustration with the review process and disappointment with editorial decisions. Given the different types of theoretical contributions that may be suitable for a given manuscript and recognizing the changing nature of empirical work within Econ-IS, we attempt to shed some light on theoretical contributions within empirical Econ-IS research, paying attention to their nature, types, and impact. Specifically, we start by reflecting on the typical theory-related comments we have seen in review packets that we generalize to a set of critiques often related to empirical papers. Subsequently, we provide a working definition of a theoretical contribution and the components that make up such a contribution. We then propose a taxonomy of theoretical contributions typically observed in Information Systems Research ( ISR ). Based on this taxonomy of contributions, the typical critiques observed in empirical Econ-IS papers, and a set of published papers, we provide some broad guidelines for how authors may craft an effective theoretical contribution for submission to ISR . We also discuss a pathway for manuscripts that do not (seek to) offer significant theoretical contributions. Such manuscripts are welcome, but we believe that a very high bar of practical impact must be met for them to succeed in the review process. Based on the guidelines and suggestions made here, our hope is that authors and evaluators will participate in the review process with a shared understanding of the elusive notion of theoretical contributions.

Suggested Citation

  • Anandasivam Gopal & Pei-yu Chen & Wonseok Oh & Sean Xin Xu & Suprateek Sarker, 2024. "On Crafting Effective Theoretical Contributions for Empirical Papers in Economics of Information Systems: Some Editorial Reflections," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(3), pages 917-935, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:35:y:2024:i:3:p:917-935
    DOI: 10.1287/isre.2024.editorial.v35.n3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.2024.editorial.v35.n3
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/isre.2024.editorial.v35.n3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:35:y:2024:i:3:p:917-935. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.