[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v13y2024i10p558-d1501950.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Extremes: The Impact of Radical Right-Wing Populism on Conspiracy Beliefs in Austria

Author

Listed:
  • Diana Lucia Hofmann

    (Department of Political Science, University of Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria)

Abstract
(1) Background: Populist radical right-wing parties and politicians have used conspiracy theories to perpetuate the antagonism between an evil elite conspiring against the good and unknowing people. Yet, less is known about whether and to what extent radical right-wing populism at the individual level is associated with different conspiracy beliefs. This analysis explores how the main components of radical right-wing populism—populist, nativist, and authoritarian attitudes—relate to both a general conspiracy mentality and specific conspiracy theories prevalent in political discourse. (2) Methods: Using data from an original 2023 online survey conducted in Austria, a stronghold of the populist radical right, this study includes new questions on immigration, COVID-19, and climate change, as well as a conspiracy mentality scale. (3) Results: The analyses reveal that all the main components are positively associated with different conspiracy beliefs, albeit to varying degrees. Across models, the strongest predictor is populism, followed by nativism and authoritarianism. Nativism varies the most across different conspiracy beliefs and is particularly associated with the belief in conspiracy theories related to immigration and climate change. (4) Conclusions: The results highlight the prevalence of radical right-wing populist attitudes across various conspiracy beliefs, reflecting how populist radical right-wing actors leverage conspiracy theories in their political discourse.

Suggested Citation

  • Diana Lucia Hofmann, 2024. "Exploring the Extremes: The Impact of Radical Right-Wing Populism on Conspiracy Beliefs in Austria," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-19, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:13:y:2024:i:10:p:558-:d:1501950
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/13/10/558/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/13/10/558/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert Brotherton & Christopher C French, 2015. "Intention Seekers: Conspiracist Ideation and Biased Attributions of Intentionality," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-14, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ana Stojanov & Jesse M Bering & Jamin Halberstadt, 2020. "Does Perceived Lack of Control Lead to Conspiracy Theory Beliefs? Findings from an online MTurk sample," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:13:y:2024:i:10:p:558-:d:1501950. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.