[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i22p15806-d1277402.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainability of Romanian Small and Medium Enterprises Using the Electronic Signature as a Driving Digital Tool

Author

Listed:
  • Corina-Ana Borcoși

    (Research, Development and Innovation Institute, Constantin Brâncuși University, 210185 Targu Jiu, Romania)

  • Ilie Borcoși

    (Faculty of Engineering, Constantin Brâncuși University, 210185 Targu Jiu, Romania)

  • Marius Marian

    (Department of Computers and Information Technology, University of Craiova, 200585 Craiova, Romania)

  • Adelin Cusman

    (CERT DIGITAL, Centrul de Calcul SA, 210185 Targu Jiu, Romania)

  • Dragoș Ionică

    (CERT DIGITAL, Centrul de Calcul SA, 210185 Targu Jiu, Romania)

Abstract
The new motto of our society is sustainability through digitalization. The trend towards digitalization of enterprises is indeed a form of sustainable development. Within the European Union, policies are drawn up, and actions are undertaken to contribute to the creation of a sustainable, high-performing economy. Business performance today is also associated with digitalization, i.e., with the use of digital tools. The widespread use of digital tools in the economy also depends on their implementation by Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs), which have a significant weight in the economy of each country member. This study addresses this issue of widespread use of digital tools by Romanian SMEs. The purpose of the study is to determine the impact and relevance of the use of digital tools, more precisely the use of the digital signature, on Romanian SMEs, and what are the impediments to the use of the digital signature for all documents, “on a large scale”, in any situation (a SWOT analysis was carried out that highlights the constraints and limitations, but also the factors that are advantageous and determine the use of the digital signature by SMEs). The research was based on two related studies: the first investigation covers the use cases of digital signature within the community of Romanian SMEs, while the second study reflects on the use of digital signatures by Romanian SMEs, from the perspective of the commercial certified trust service providers from Romania. Quantitative and qualitative methods were used, which provided many interesting results. Thus, it was found that companies with a short and those with a long presence in the market use the digital signature less than those with an average one, and the most important advantage of using the digital signature is the reduction in time, in second place being the reduction in costs. The study also reveals that the biggest barrier to the widespread use of the digital signature is the lack of information and know-how, which is why we considered it appropriate to carry out this study. The results of the study are discussed considering today’s increasingly digitalized context. This study enriches the specialized literature with information on the use of digital signatures by Romanian SMEs.

Suggested Citation

  • Corina-Ana Borcoși & Ilie Borcoși & Marius Marian & Adelin Cusman & Dragoș Ionică, 2023. "Sustainability of Romanian Small and Medium Enterprises Using the Electronic Signature as a Driving Digital Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-26, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:22:p:15806-:d:1277402
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/22/15806/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/22/15806/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Björn Döhring & Atanas Hristov & Christoph Maier & Werner Roeger & Anna Thum-Thysen, 2021. "COVID-19 acceleration in digitalisation, aggregate productivity growth and the functional income distribution," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 571-604, July.
    2. Alfredo Jiménez & Dorra Yahiaoui & Chi Zhang & Cuiling Jiang, 2023. "Sustainable International Management: Research in Global Culture and Leadership Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-2, February.
    3. Ionela Maniu & Cătălina Costache & Dănuţ-Dumitru Dumitraşcu, 2021. "Adoption of Green Environmental Practices in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: Entrepreneur and Business Policies Patterns in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-21, April.
    4. Magdalena Alina ILCUS, 2018. "Impact of Digitalization in Business World," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 19(4), pages 350-358, October.
    5. Jaisy Aghniarahim Putritamara & Budi Hartono & Hery Toiba & Hamidah Nayati Utami & Moh Shadiqur Rahman & Dewi Masyithoh, 2023. "Do Dynamic Capabilities and Digital Transformation Improve Business Resilience during the COVID-19 Pandemic? Insights from Beekeeping MSMEs in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wiweko Probojakti & Hamidah Nayati Utami & Arik Prasetya & Muhammad Faisal Riza, 2024. "Building Sustainable Competitive Advantage in Banking through Organizational Agility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-15, September.
    2. Olena Liakh, 2021. "Accountability through Sustainability Data Governance: Reconfiguring Reporting to Better Account for the Digital Acceleration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Caselli, Mauro & Fracasso, Andrea, 2021. "Covid-19 and Technology," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1001, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    4. Kamaha Njiwa, Marinette & Atif, Muhammad & Arshad, Muhammad & Mirza, Nawazish, 2023. "The impact of female dominance on business resilience: A technology adoption perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    5. Liviu Ciucan-Rusu & Valentina Vasile & Daniel Stefan & Calin-Adrian Comes & Anamari-Beatrice Stefan & Mihai Timus & Anca Oltean & Elena Bunduchi & Maria-Alexandra Popa, 2022. "Consumers Behavior Determinants on Online Local Market Platforms in COVID-19 Pandemic—A Probit Qualitative Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(22), pages 1-17, November.
    6. Mustafa Ozguven & Chong Yan Gao & Mohamed Yacine Si Tayeb, 2021. "The Utilization of Autoregressive Forecasting Models in Strategic Management," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 5(7), pages 170-185.
    7. Florin Mihai & Ofelia Ema Aleca & Emilia Gogu & Cosmin Dobrin & Mirela Gheorghe, 2021. "The Challenges of the Green Economy in Romania. Scientific Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-22, November.
    8. Simona MASCU, 2021. "Factors That Trigger Changes in Modern Organizations," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 22(5), pages 729-737, December.
    9. repec:fst:rfsisf:v:7:y:2022:i:13:p:51-62 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Simona MASCU, 2021. "Developing the Competitiveness of Organizations by Amplifying the Role of Human Resources," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 2, pages 220-223.
    11. Sun, Bing & Zhang, Yanfeng & Zhu, Kunyan & Mao, Hongying & Liang, Tian, 2024. "Is faster really better? The impact of digital transformation speed on firm financial distress: Based on the cost-benefit perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    12. Edi-Cristian Dumitra & Iulia Maria Gandea, 2022. "Digitalisation-‘The Invisible Hand’ of Digital economy," Journal of Financial Studies, Institute of Financial Studies, vol. 13(7), pages 51-62, November.
    13. Thillai Raja Pertheban & Ramayah Thurasamy & Anbalagan Marimuthu & Kumara Rajah Venkatachalam & Sanmugam Annamalah & Pradeep Paraman & Wong Chee Hoo, 2023. "The Impact of Proactive Resilience Strategies on Organizational Performance: Role of Ambidextrous and Dynamic Capabilities of SMEs in Manufacturing Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-32, August.
    14. Nguyen, Mai & Malik, Ashish & Sharma, Piyush & Kingshott, Russel & Gugnani, Ritika, 2024. "High involvement work system and organizational and employee resilience: Impact of digitalisation in crisis situations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    15. Lavinia-Andreea GRUIA & Nicolae BIBU & Marian NASTASE & Alexandru ROJA & Nicoleta CRISTACHE, 2020. "Approaches to Digitalization within Organizations and Romania," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 21(3), pages 287-297, July.
    16. Paola Vásquez & Viviana Gallego & J. David Soto, 2024. "Transforming MSMEs towards circularity: an attainable challenge with the appropriate technologies and approaches," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 624-644, September.
    17. repec:fst:rfsisf:v:13:y:2022:i:13:p:51-62 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Vasso Marinoudi & Lefteris Benos & Carolina Camacho Villa & Maria Lampridi & Dimitrios Kateris & Remigio Berruto & Simon Pearson & Claus Grøn Sørensen & Dionysis Bochtis, 2024. "Adapting to the Agricultural Labor Market Shaped by Robotization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-20, August.
    19. Cristi Spulbar & Lucian Claudiu Anghel & Ramona Birau & Simona Ioana Ermiș & Laurențiu-Mihai Treapăt & Adrian T. Mitroi, 2022. "Digitalization as a Factor in Reducing Poverty and Its Implications in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-26, August.
    20. Enji Li & Ziwei An, 2024. "Does Transportation Infrastructure Construction Enhance Enterprise Innovation Resilience in China?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-21, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:22:p:15806-:d:1277402. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.