[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i14p11167-d1196307.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Opportunity to Use New Ways of Working: Do Sectors and Organizational Characteristics Shape Employee Perceptions?

Author

Listed:
  • David Giauque

    (Swiss Graduate School of Public Administration, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland)

  • Frédéric Cornu

    (Swiss Graduate School of Public Administration, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland)

  • Karine Renard

    (Swiss Graduate School of Public Administration, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland)

  • Yves Emery

    (Swiss Graduate School of Public Administration, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland)

Abstract
The diffusion of New Ways of Working (NWW) is an important trend in contemporary organizations. Many related empirical studies have been produced, but none have focused on differences in employees’ perceptions of the opportunity to use NWW according to organization sector (private, semi-public, public). This study, based on neo institutionalism and HR attributions theory, investigated these differences via a survey ( n = 2693) of employees at private ( n = 358), semi-public ( n = 204), and public ( n = 2131) organizations. Based on the use of the PLS-SEM method, as well as ANOVA tests and pairwise comparisons of marginal linear predictions, we uncover differences in perceptions between employees in different sectors regarding the possibility of using NWW. Indeed, the results show that public employees reported less opportunity to use NWW than their private and semi-public counterparts. Furthermore, private sector employees were more likely to attribute well-being and productivity benefits to NWW than their public sector and semi-public counterparts. We also show that institutional and organizational variables specific to the characteristics of organizations in the three sectors partially explain the degree of perceptions with respect to the opportunity to use NWW.

Suggested Citation

  • David Giauque & Frédéric Cornu & Karine Renard & Yves Emery, 2023. "Opportunity to Use New Ways of Working: Do Sectors and Organizational Characteristics Shape Employee Perceptions?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-21, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:11167-:d:1196307
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/11167/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/11167/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gerards, Ruud & de Grip, Andries & Weustink, A., 2018. "Do new ways of working increase informal learning?," Research Memorandum 010, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
    2. Linda Holbeche, 2019. "Designing sustainably agile and resilient organizations," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(5), pages 668-677, September.
    3. Yasuhiro Kotera & Katia Correa Vione, 2020. "Psychological Impacts of the New Ways of Working (NWW): A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-13, July.
    4. Karine Renard & Frederic Cornu & Yves Emery & David Giauque, 2021. "The Impact of New Ways of Working on Organizations and Employees: A Systematic Review of Literature," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, April.
    5. Ruud Gerards & Sanne Wetten & Cecile Sambeek, 2021. "New ways of working and intrapreneurial behaviour: the mediating role of transformational leadership and social interaction," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(7), pages 2075-2110, October.
    6. Joseph F. Hair & G. Tomas M. Hult & Christian M. Ringle & Marko Sarstedt & Kai Oliver Thiele, 2017. "Mirror, mirror on the wall: a comparative evaluation of composite-based structural equation modeling methods," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(5), pages 616-632, September.
    7. Annick Willem & Ans De Vos & Marc Buelens, 2010. "Comparing Private and Public Sector Employees' Psychological Contracts," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 275-302, March.
    8. Sarstedt, Marko & Hair, Joseph F. & Cheah, Jun-Hwa & Becker, Jan-Michael & Ringle, Christian M., 2019. "How to specify, estimate, and validate higher-order constructs in PLS-SEM," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 197-211.
    9. Rashmi Chordiya & Meghna Sabharwal & R. Paul Battaglio, 2019. "Dispositional and organizational sources of job satisfaction: a cross-national study," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(8), pages 1101-1124, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frédéric Cornu, 2022. "New Ways of Working and Employee In-Role Performance in Swiss Public Administration," Merits, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Unay‐Gailhard, İlkay & Brennan, Mark A., 2023. "Young farmers in “The New World of Work”: The contribution of new media to the work engagement and professional identities," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 88(2), pages 426-460.
    3. Halpern, Nigel & Mwesiumo, Deodat & Suau-Sanchez, Pere & Budd, Thomas & Bråthen, Svein, 2021. "Ready for digital transformation? The effect of organisational readiness, innovation, airport size and ownership on digital change at airports," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    4. Roshayati Abdul Hamid, 2022. "The Role of Employees’ Technology Readiness, Job Meaningfulness and Proactive Personality in Adaptive Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-16, November.
    5. Roberto Pico-Saltos & David Sabando-Vera & Marcela Yonfa-Medranda & Javier Garzás & Andrés Redchuk, 2022. "Hierarchical Component Model (HCM) of Career Success and the Moderating Effect of Gender, from the Perspective of University Alumni: Multigroup Analysis and Empirical Evidence from Quevedo, Ecuador," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-25, December.
    6. Ammarn Sodawan & Robert Li-Wei Hsu, 2022. "Halal-Friendly Attributes and Muslims’ Visit Intention: Exploring the Roles of Perceived Value and Destination Trust," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-23, September.
    7. Georgios Siokas & Aggelos Tsakanikas, 2023. "The Role of Economic and Innovation Initiatives in Planning a Smart City Strategy in Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-15, October.
    8. Cheah, Jun-Hwa & Waller, David & Thaichon, Park & Ting, Hiram & Lim, Xin-Jean, 2020. "Price image and the sugrophobia effect on luxury retail purchase intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    9. Scott C. Manley & Joseph F. Hair & Ralph I. Williams & William C. McDowell, 2021. "Essential new PLS-SEM analysis methods for your entrepreneurship analytical toolbox," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1805-1825, December.
    10. Danks, Nicholas P. & Sharma, Pratyush N. & Sarstedt, Marko, 2020. "Model selection uncertainty and multimodel inference in partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM)," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 13-24.
    11. Cubillas-Para, Clara & Cegarra-Navarro, Juan Gabriel & Vătămănescu, Elena-Mădălina, 2024. "Gliding from regenerative unlearning toward digital transformation via collaboration with customers and organisational agility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    12. Hossain, Md Afnan & Akter, Shahriar & Yanamandram, Venkata & Strong, Carolyn, 2024. "Navigating the platform economy: Crafting a customer analytics capability instrument," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    13. Anita Holm Riis, 2023. "Interculture; Concept, Use and Ethics between Equality and Difference," European Journal of Social Sciences Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 6, ejss_v6_i.
    14. Jiatong Yu & Jiajue Wang & Taesoo Moon, 2022. "Influence of Digital Transformation Capability on Operational Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-20, June.
    15. Ting Chi & Olabisi Adesanya & Hang Liu & Rebecca Anderson & Zihui Zhao, 2023. "Renting than Buying Apparel: U.S. Consumer Collaborative Consumption for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, March.
    16. Carlos Bazan, 2022. "Effect of the University’s Environment and Support System on Subjective Social Norms as Precursor of the Entrepreneurial Intention of Students," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, October.
    17. Zhikun Ding & Xinyue Huang & Xinrui Wang & Qiaohui Chen & Jiasheng Zhang & Zezhou Wu, 2024. "Investigating the Determinants of Construction Stakeholders’ Intention to Use Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling Products Based on the S-O-R Model in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-17, March.
    18. Ashish Kumar & Muskaan Arora & Monika Saini, 2023. "Influence of mathematics on the academic performance of mechanical engineering students: a PLS-SEM approach," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 14(1), pages 367-376, February.
    19. Keen, Christian & Lescop, Denis & Sanchez-Famoso, Valeriano, 2022. "Does coopetition support SMEs in turbulent contexts?," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    20. Rahila Huma Anwar & Sajida Zaki & Natasha Memon & Ramayah Thurasamy, 2021. "Exploring the Interplay of Trait Emotional Intelligence and ESL Teacher Effectiveness: Is Self-Efficacy the Mechanism Linking Them?," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:11167-:d:1196307. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.