[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i12p6615-d572309.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Policy Analysis on Watershed Governance in Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Tri Sulistyaningsih

    (Department of Government Studies, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Malang 65144, Indonesia)

  • Achmad Nurmandi

    (Jusuf Kalla School of Government, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta 55183, Indonesia)

  • Salahudin Salahudin

    (Department of Government Studies, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Malang 65144, Indonesia)

  • Ali Roziqin

    (Department of Government Studies, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Malang 65144, Indonesia)

  • Muhammad Kamil

    (Department of Government Studies, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Malang 65144, Indonesia)

  • Iradhad T. Sihidi

    (Department of Government Studies, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Malang 65144, Indonesia)

  • Ach. Apriyanto Romadhan

    (Department of Government Studies, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Malang 65144, Indonesia)

  • Mohammad Jafar Loilatu

    (Jusuf Kalla School of Government, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta 55183, Indonesia)

Abstract
This paper, which is focused on evaluating the policies and institutional control of the Brantas River Basin, East Java, Indonesia, aims to review government regulations on watershed governance in Indonesia. A qualitative approach to content analysis is used to explain and layout government regulations regarding planning, implementation, coordination, monitoring, evaluation, and accountability of the central and local governments in managing the Brantas watershed, East Java, Indonesia. Nvivo 12 Plus software is used to map, analyze, and create data visualization to answer research questions. This study reveals that the management regulations of the Brantas watershed, East Java, Indonesia, are based on a centralized system, which places the central government as an actor who plays an essential role in the formulation, implementation, and accountability of the Brantas watershed management. In contrast, East Java Province’s regional government only plays a role in implementing and evaluating policies. The central government previously formulated the Brantas watershed. This research contributes to strengthening the management and institutional arrangement of the central government and local governments that support the realization of good governance of the Brantas watershed. Future research needs to apply a survey research approach that focuses on evaluating the capacity of the central government and local governments in supporting good management of the Brantas watershed.

Suggested Citation

  • Tri Sulistyaningsih & Achmad Nurmandi & Salahudin Salahudin & Ali Roziqin & Muhammad Kamil & Iradhad T. Sihidi & Ach. Apriyanto Romadhan & Mohammad Jafar Loilatu, 2021. "Public Policy Analysis on Watershed Governance in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-21, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:12:p:6615-:d:572309
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/12/6615/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/12/6615/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Blomquist, William & Giansante, Consuelo & Bhat, Anjali & Kemper, Karin, 2005. "Institutional and policy analysis of river basin management: the Gudalquivir River Basin, Spain," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3526, The World Bank.
    2. Elaine van Tol Smit & Rob de Loë & Ryan Plummer, 2015. "How knowledge is used in collaborative environmental governance: water classification in New Brunswick, Canada," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(3), pages 423-444, March.
    3. Blomquist, William & Haisman, Brian & Dinar, Ariel & Bhat, Anjali, 2005. "Institutional and policy analysis of river basin management: the Murray Darling River Basin, Austrialia," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3527, The World Bank.
    4. Oran R. Young, 2008. "The Architecture of Global Environmental Governance: Bringing Science to Bear on Policy," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 8(1), pages 14-32, February.
    5. Rahman, H.M. Tuihedur & Hickey, Gordon M. & Sarker, Swapan Kumar, 2012. "A framework for evaluating collective action and informal institutional dynamics under a resource management policy of decentralization," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 32-41.
    6. Johnsson, Rosa Maria Formiga & Kemper, Karin, 2005. "Institutional and policy analysis of river basin management : the Alto-Tiete river basin, Sao Paulo, Brazil," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3650, The World Bank.
    7. Bhat, Anjali & Ramu, Kikkeri & Kemper, Karin, 2005. "Institutional and policy analysis of river basin management: the Brantas river basin, East Java, Indonesia," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3611, The World Bank.
    8. Konrad Hagedorn, 2008. "Particular requirements for institutional analysis in nature-related sectors," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 35(3), pages 357-384, September.
    9. Blomquist, William & Calbick, Ken S. & Dinar, Ariel, 2005. "Institutional and policy analysis of river basin management: the Fraser River Basin, Canada," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3525, The World Bank.
    10. D. J. Bandaragoda, 2000. "A Framework forInstitutional Analysis for Water Resources Management in a River Basin Context," IWMI Working Papers H026416, International Water Management Institute.
    11. Blomquist, William & Ballestero, Maureen & Bhat, Anjali & Kemper, Karin, 2005. "Institutional and policy analysis of river basin management: the tarcoles river basin, Costa Rica," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3612, The World Bank.
    12. Blomquist, William & Tonderski, Andrzej & Dinar, Ariel, 2005. "Institutional and policy analysis of river basin management: the Warta River Basin, Poland," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3528, The World Bank.
    13. Johnsson, Rosa Maria Formiga & Kemper, Karin, 2005. "Institutional and policy analysis of river basin management : the Jaguaribe river basin, Ceara, Brazil," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3649, The World Bank.
    14. Seiichi Kagaya & Tetsuya Wada, 2021. "The application of environmental governance for sustainable watershed-based management," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 643-671, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Budi Hadi Narendra & Chairil Anwar Siregar & I Wayan Susi Dharmawan & Asep Sukmana & Pratiwi & Irfan Budi Pramono & Tyas Mutiara Basuki & Hunggul Yudono Setio Hadi Nugroho & Agung Budi Supangat & Purw, 2021. "A Review on Sustainability of Watershed Management in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-29, October.
    2. Leslie Lipper & Jyotsna Puri & Romina Cavatassi & Nancy McCarthy, 2022. "How does climate change affect the evidence we need for agricultural development?," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 53(6), pages 911-923, November.
    3. Quanxi Wang & Ni Wang & Haodong Wang & Yuan Xiu, 2022. "Study on Influencing Factors and Simulation of Watershed Ecological Compensation Based on Evolutionary Game," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-23, March.
    4. Tyas Mutiara Basuki & Hunggul Yudono Setio Hadi Nugroho & Yonky Indrajaya & Irfan Budi Pramono & Nunung Puji Nugroho & Agung Budi Supangat & Dewi Retna Indrawati & Endang Savitri & Nining Wahyuningrum, 2022. "Improvement of Integrated Watershed Management in Indonesia for Mitigation and Adaptation to Climate Change: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-41, August.
    5. Rebecca L. Rowe & Cahyo Prayogo & Simon Oakley & Kurniatun Hairiah & Meine van Noordwijk & Karuniawan Puji Wicaksono & Syahrul Kurniawan & Alice Fitch & Edi Dwi Cahyono & Didik Suprayogo & Niall P. Mc, 2022. "Improved Coffee Management by Farmers in State Forest Plantations in Indonesia: An Experimental Platform," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Estache, Antonio & Garsous, Grégoire & Seroa da Motta, Ronaldo, 2016. "Shared Mandates, Moral Hazard, and Political (Mis)alignment in a Decentralized Economy," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 98-110.
    2. Estache, Antonio & Garsous, Grégoire & Seroa da Motta, Ronaldo, 2016. "Shared Mandates, Moral Hazard, and Political (Mis)alignment in a Decentralized Economy," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 98-110.
    3. Rebecca Neaera Abers & Margaret E. Keck, 2009. "Mobilizing the State: The Erratic Partner in Brazil's Participatory Water Policy," Politics & Society, , vol. 37(2), pages 289-314, June.
    4. Merrey, Douglas J. & Levite, Herve & van Koppen, Barbara, 2009. "Are good intentions leading to good outcomes? continuities in social, economic and hydro-political trajectories in the Olifants River Basin, South Africa," Book Chapters,, International Water Management Institute.
    5. Salmoral, Gloria & Garrido, Alberto, 2015. "The Common Agricultural Policy as a driver of water quality changes: the case of the Guadalquivir River Basin (southern Spain)," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 4(2), pages 1-21, August.
    6. Getnet, Kindie & Pfeifer, Catherine & MacAlister, Charlotte, 2014. "Economic incentives and natural resource management among small-scale farmers: Addressing the missing link," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 1-7.
    7. Martin Roestamy & Mohamad Ali Fulazzaky, 2022. "A review of the water resources management for the Brantas River basin: challenges in the transition to an integrated water resources management," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(10), pages 11514-11529, October.
    8. Xiaokai Li & Graeme Turner & Liping Jiang, 2012. "Grow in Concert with Nature : Sustaining East Asia's Water Resources through Green Water Defense," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 9370.
    9. Rebecca Neaera Abers & Margaret E. Keck, 2006. "Muddy Waters: The Political Construction of Deliberative River Basin Governance in Brazil," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 601-622, September.
    10. Venot, Jean-Philippe, 2009. "Rural dynamics and new challenges in the Indian water sector: the trajectory of the Krishna Basin, South India," Book Chapters,, International Water Management Institute.
    11. Suwatchai Denfanapapol & Prasongchai Setthasuravich & Surapong Rattanakul & Aphisit Pukdeewut & Hironori Kato, 2024. "The Digital Divide, Wealth, and Inequality: An Examination of Socio-Economic Determinants of Collaborative Environmental Governance in Thailand through Provincial-Level Panel Data Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-22, May.
    12. Griewald, Yuliana, 2018. "The Art of the State to Intervene: Insights Into Agricultural Land Management in Russia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 1-9.
    13. Konrad Hagedorn, 2013. "Natural resource management: the role of cooperative institutions and governance," Journal of Entrepreneurial and Organizational Diversity, European Research Institute on Cooperative and Social Enterprises, vol. 2(1), pages 101-121, September.
    14. H.M. Tuihedur Rahman & Gordon M. Hickey, 2020. "An Analytical Framework for Assessing Context-Specific Rural Livelihood Vulnerability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-26, July.
    15. Cavalcante, Ana Helena A. P., 2015. "Barriers and opportunities for climate adaptation: The water crisis in Greater São Paulo," The Constitutional Economics Network Working Papers 04-2015, University of Freiburg, Department of Economic Policy and Constitutional Economic Theory.
    16. World Bank, 2007. "Making the Most of Scarcity : Accountability for Better Water Management Results in the Middle East and North Africa," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 6845.
    17. Pant, Dhruba & Bhatta, B. & Shrestha, Pratima, 2008. "Multi-stakeholder perspective in catchment management: case from Nepal," IWMI Conference Proceedings 273364, International Water Management Institute.
    18. Lay Mei Sim & Akio Onishi & Olivier Gervais & Ngai Weng Chan, 2018. "Comparative Research on River Basin Management in the Sagami River Basin (Japan) and the Muda River Basin (Malaysia)," Resources, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-17, May.
    19. Daedlow, Katrin & Beckmann, Volker & Schlüter, Maja & Arlinghaus, Robert, 2013. "Explaining institutional persistence, adaptation, and transformation in East German recreational-fisheries governance after the German reunification in 1990," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 36-50.
    20. Maaß, Oliver & Grundmann, Philipp & von Bock und Polach, Carlotta, 2014. "Added-value from innovative value chains by establishing nutrient cycles via struvite," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 126-136.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:12:p:6615-:d:572309. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.