[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v11y2018i5p1254-d146303.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Duality Based Risk Mitigation Method for Construction of Joint Hydro-Wind Coordination Short-Run Marginal Cost Curves

Author

Listed:
  • Perica Ilak

    (Department of Energy and Power Systems, University of Zagreb Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, Unska 3, Zagreb HR-10000, Croatia)

  • Ivan Rajšl

    (Department of Energy and Power Systems, University of Zagreb Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, Unska 3, Zagreb HR-10000, Croatia)

  • Josip Đaković

    (Department of Energy and Power Systems, University of Zagreb Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, Unska 3, Zagreb HR-10000, Croatia)

  • Marko Delimar

    (Department of Energy and Power Systems, University of Zagreb Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, Unska 3, Zagreb HR-10000, Croatia)

Abstract
This study analyzes the short-run hydro generation scheduling for the wind power differences from the contracted schedule. The approach for construction of the joint short-run marginal cost curve for the hydro-wind coordinated generation is proposed and applied on the real example. This joint short-run marginal cost curve is important for its participation in the energy markets and for economic feasibility assessment of such coordination. The approach credibly describes the short-run marginal costs which this coordination bears in “real life”. The approach is based on the duality framework of a convex programming and as a novelty combines the shadow price of risk mitigation, which quantifies the hourly cost of mitigating risk, and the water shadow price, which quantifies the marginal cost of electricity production. The proposed approach is formulated as a stochastic linear program and tested on the case of the Vinodol hydropower system and the wind farm Vrataruša in Croatia. The result of the case study is a family of 24 joint short-run marginal cost curves. The proposed method is expected to be of great interest to investors as it enables risk mitigation for investors with diverse risk preferences, from risk-averse to risk-seeking.

Suggested Citation

  • Perica Ilak & Ivan Rajšl & Josip Đaković & Marko Delimar, 2018. "Duality Based Risk Mitigation Method for Construction of Joint Hydro-Wind Coordination Short-Run Marginal Cost Curves," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-12, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:5:p:1254-:d:146303
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/5/1254/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/5/1254/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ilak, Perica & Rajšl, Ivan & Krajcar, Slavko & Delimar, Marko, 2015. "The impact of a wind variable generation on the hydro generation water shadow price," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 197-208.
    2. Perica Ilak & Slavko Krajcar & Ivan Rajšl & Marko Delimar, 2014. "Pricing Energy and Ancillary Services in a Day-Ahead Market for a Price-Taker Hydro Generating Company Using a Risk-Constrained Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-26, April.
    3. Haifeng Zhang & Feng Gao & Jiang Wu & Kun Liu & Xiaolin Liu, 2012. "Optimal Bidding Strategies for Wind Power Producers in the Day-ahead Electricity Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(11), pages 1-20, November.
    4. Bahrami, Shahab & Amini, M. Hadi, 2018. "A decentralized trading algorithm for an electricity market with generation uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 520-532.
    5. repec:cep:stitep:301 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Acerbi, Carlo, 2002. "Spectral measures of risk: A coherent representation of subjective risk aversion," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(7), pages 1505-1518, July.
    7. Varkani, Ali Karimi & Daraeepour, Ali & Monsef, Hassan, 2011. "A new self-scheduling strategy for integrated operation of wind and pumped-storage power plants in power markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(12), pages 5002-5012.
    8. Anthony Horsley & Andrew J Wrobel, 1996. "Efficiency Rents of Storage Plants in Peak-Load Pricing, I: Pumped Storage," STICERD - Theoretical Economics Paper Series /1996/301, Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, LSE.
    9. Tjalling C. Koopmans, 1957. "Water Storage Policy in a Simplified Hydroelectric System," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 26, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    10. Kaldellis, J.K. & Kapsali, M. & Kavadias, K.A., 2010. "Energy balance analysis of wind-based pumped hydro storage systems in remote island electrical networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(8), pages 2427-2437, August.
    11. Rockafellar, R. Tyrrell & Uryasev, Stanislav, 2002. "Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(7), pages 1443-1471, July.
    12. Horsley, Anthony & Wrobel, Andrew J., 1999. "Efficiency rents of storage plants in peak-load pricing, ii: hydroelectricity," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 19342, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Ivan Rajšl & Perica Ilak & Marko Delimar & Slavko Krajcar, 2012. "Dispatch Method for Independently Owned Hydropower Plants in the Same River Flow," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(9), pages 1-17, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Krešimir Fekete & Srete Nikolovski & Zvonimir Klaić & Ana Androjić, 2019. "Optimal Re-Dispatching of Cascaded Hydropower Plants Using Quadratic Programming and Chance-Constrained Programming," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-25, April.
    2. Lin Herenčić & Perica Ilak & Ivan Rajšl, 2019. "Effects of Local Electricity Trading on Power Flows and Voltage Levels for Different Elasticities and Prices," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Sara Raos & Perica Ilak & Ivan Rajšl & Tena Bilić & Ghislain Trullenque, 2019. "Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making for Assessing the Enhanced Geothermal Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-23, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ilak, Perica & Rajšl, Ivan & Krajcar, Slavko & Delimar, Marko, 2015. "The impact of a wind variable generation on the hydro generation water shadow price," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 197-208.
    2. Perica Ilak & Slavko Krajcar & Ivan Rajšl & Marko Delimar, 2014. "Pricing Energy and Ancillary Services in a Day-Ahead Market for a Price-Taker Hydro Generating Company Using a Risk-Constrained Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-26, April.
    3. Horsley, Anthony & Wrobel, Andrew J., 2002. "Efficiency rents of pumped-storage plants and their uses for operation and investment decisions," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 109-142, November.
    4. Anthony Horsley & Andrew J Wrobel, 1999. "Efficiency Rents of Storage Plants in Peak-Load Pricing, II: Hydroelectricity - (Now published as Efficiency rents of hydroelectric storage plants in continuous-time peak-load pricing, in The Current ," STICERD - Theoretical Economics Paper Series 372, Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, LSE.
    5. Pandžić, Hrvoje & Kuzle, Igor & Capuder, Tomislav, 2013. "Virtual power plant mid-term dispatch optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 134-141.
    6. Alois Pichler, 2013. "Premiums And Reserves, Adjusted By Distortions," Papers 1304.0490, arXiv.org.
    7. Brian Tomlin & Yimin Wang, 2005. "On the Value of Mix Flexibility and Dual Sourcing in Unreliable Newsvendor Networks," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 7(1), pages 37-57, June.
    8. Giovanni Paolo Crespi & Elisa Mastrogiacomo, 2020. "Qualitative robustness of set-valued value-at-risk," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 91(1), pages 25-54, February.
    9. Stelios Bekiros & Nikolaos Loukeris & Iordanis Eleftheriadis & Christos Avdoulas, 2019. "Tail-Related Risk Measurement and Forecasting in Equity Markets," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 53(2), pages 783-816, February.
    10. Steven Kou & Xianhua Peng, 2016. "On the Measurement of Economic Tail Risk," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(5), pages 1056-1072, October.
    11. Wolfgang Kürsten & Mario Brandtner, 2009. "Kohärente Risikomessung versus individuelle Akzeptanzmengen — Anmerkungen zum impliziten Risikoverständnis des “Conditional Value-at-Risk”," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 61(4), pages 358-381, June.
    12. Charles-Olivier Amédée-Manesme & Fabrice Barthélémy & Donald Keenan, 2015. "Cornish-Fisher Expansion for Commercial Real Estate Value at Risk," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 439-464, May.
    13. Anthony Horsley & Andrew Wrobel, 2005. "Continuity of the equilibrium price density and its uses in peak-load pricing," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 26(4), pages 839-866, November.
    14. Pesenti, Silvana M. & Millossovich, Pietro & Tsanakas, Andreas, 2019. "Reverse sensitivity testing: What does it take to break the model?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(2), pages 654-670.
    15. Su, Chengguo & Cheng, Chuntian & Wang, Peilin & Shen, Jianjian & Wu, Xinyu, 2019. "Optimization model for long-distance integrated transmission of wind farms and pumped-storage hydropower plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 285-293.
    16. Chuancun Yin & Dan Zhu, 2015. "New class of distortion risk measures and their tail asymptotics with emphasis on VaR," Papers 1503.08586, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2016.
    17. Daouia, Abdelaati & Girard, Stéphane & Stupfler, Gilles, 2018. "Tail expectile process and risk assessment," TSE Working Papers 18-944, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    18. Dan A. Iancu & Marek Petrik & Dharmashankar Subramanian, 2015. "Tight Approximations of Dynamic Risk Measures," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 40(3), pages 655-682, March.
    19. Choo, Weihao & de Jong, Piet, 2016. "Insights to systematic risk and diversification across a joint probability distribution," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 142-150.
    20. Li, Yanhai & Gu, Chaocheng & Ou, Jinwen, 2020. "Supporting a financially constrained supplier under spectral risk measures: The efficiency of buyer lending," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:5:p:1254-:d:146303. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.