[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v9y2016i12p1059-d85273.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-Attribute Technological Modeling of Coal Deposits Based on the Fuzzy TOPSIS and C-Mean Clustering Algorithms

Author

Listed:
  • Miloš Gligorić

    (Faculty of Mining and Geology, University of Belgrade, Đušina 7, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Zoran Gligorić

    (Faculty of Mining and Geology, University of Belgrade, Đušina 7, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Čedomir Beljić

    (Faculty of Mining and Geology, University of Belgrade, Đušina 7, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Slavko Torbica

    (Faculty of Mining and Geology, University of Belgrade, Đušina 7, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Svetlana Štrbac Savić

    (The School of Electrical and Computer Engineering of Applied Studies, Vojvode Stepe 283, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Jasmina Nedeljković Ostojić

    (Department of Geodesy, Belgrade University College of Applied Studies in Civil Engineering and Geodesy, Hajduk Stanka 2, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

Abstract
The main aim of a coal deposit model is to provide an effective basis for mine production planning. The most applied approach is related to block modeling as a reasonable global representation of the coal deposit. By selection of adequate block size, deposits can be well represented. A block has a location in XYZ space and is characterized by adequate attributes obtained from drill holes data. From a technological point of view, i.e., a thermal power plant’s requirements, heating value, sulfur and ash content are the most important attributes of coal. Distribution of attributes’ values within a coal deposit can vary significantly over space and within each block as well. To decrease the uncertainty of attributes’ values within blocks the concept of fuzzy triangular numbers is applied. Production planning in such an environment is a very hard task, especially in the presence of requirements. Such requirements are considered as target values while the values of block attributes are the actual values. To make production planning easier we have developed a coal deposit model based on clustering the relative closeness of actual values to the target values. The relative closeness is obtained by the TOPSIS method while technological clusters are formed by fuzzy C-mean clustering. Coal deposits are thus represented by multi-attribute technological mining cuts.

Suggested Citation

  • Miloš Gligorić & Zoran Gligorić & Čedomir Beljić & Slavko Torbica & Svetlana Štrbac Savić & Jasmina Nedeljković Ostojić, 2016. "Multi-Attribute Technological Modeling of Coal Deposits Based on the Fuzzy TOPSIS and C-Mean Clustering Algorithms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-23, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:9:y:2016:i:12:p:1059-:d:85273
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/9/12/1059/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/9/12/1059/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lamghari, Amina & Dimitrakopoulos, Roussos, 2016. "Network-flow based algorithms for scheduling production in multi-processor open-pit mines accounting for metal uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(1), pages 273-290.
    2. Meila, Marina, 2007. "Comparing clusterings--an information based distance," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 98(5), pages 873-895, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Weixin Yang & Lingguang Li, 2017. "Efficiency Evaluation and Policy Analysis of Industrial Wastewater Control in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-18, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francisco J. Valverde-Albacete & Carmen Peláez-Moreno, 2024. "A Formalization of Multilabel Classification in Terms of Lattice Theory and Information Theory: Concerning Datasets," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-31, January.
    2. Assaf Almog & Ferry Besamusca & Mel MacMahon & Diego Garlaschelli, 2015. "Mesoscopic Community Structure of Financial Markets Revealed by Price and Sign Fluctuations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, July.
    3. Franco-Sepúlveda, Giovanni & Del Rio-Cuervo, Juan Camilo & Pachón-Hernández, María Angélica, 2019. "State of the art about metaheuristics and artificial neural networks applied to open pit mining," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 125-133.
    4. Huaylla, Claudia A. & Kuperman, Marcelo N. & Garibaldi, Lucas A., 2024. "Comparison of two statistical measures of complexity applied to ecological bipartite networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 642(C).
    5. Juan Lucio & Raúl Mínguez & Asier Minondo & Francisco Requena, 2016. "Networks and the Dynamics of Firms' Export Portfolio: Evidence for Mexico," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(5), pages 708-736, May.
    6. Assaf Almog & Ferry Besamusca & Mel MacMahon & Diego Garlaschelli, 2015. "Mesoscopic Community Structure of Financial Markets Revealed by Price and Sign Fluctuations," Papers 1504.00590, arXiv.org.
    7. Kamyar Tolouei & Ehsan Moosavi & Mehran Gholinejad, 2024. "Solving LTPSOP in open-pit mines using Gaussian process and human mental search," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 61(3), pages 1061-1092, September.
    8. Federico Botta & Charo I del Genio, 2017. "Analysis of the communities of an urban mobile phone network," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-14, March.
    9. Stefano Tonellato, 2019. "Bayesian nonparametric clustering as a community detection problem," Working Papers 2019: 20, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".
    10. Lovro Šubelj & Nees Jan van Eck & Ludo Waltman, 2016. "Clustering Scientific Publications Based on Citation Relations: A Systematic Comparison of Different Methods," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-23, April.
    11. Damien A Fair & Alexander L Cohen & Jonathan D Power & Nico U F Dosenbach & Jessica A Church & Francis M Miezin & Bradley L Schlaggar & Steven E Petersen, 2009. "Functional Brain Networks Develop from a “Local to Distributed” Organization," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(5), pages 1-14, May.
    12. O’Hagan, Adrian & Murphy, Thomas Brendan & Gormley, Isobel Claire & McNicholas, Paul D. & Karlis, Dimitris, 2016. "Clustering with the multivariate normal inverse Gaussian distribution," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 18-30.
    13. Daniel Straulino & Mattie Landman & Neave O'Clery, 2020. "A bi-directional approach to comparing the modular structure of networks," Papers 2010.06568, arXiv.org.
    14. Alessandro Chessa & Pierpaolo D’Urso & Livia Giovanni & Vincenzina Vitale & Alfonso Gebbia, 2023. "Complex networks for community detection of basketball players," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 325(1), pages 363-389, June.
    15. Samavati, Mehran & Essam, Daryl & Nehring, Micah & Sarker, Ruhul, 2017. "A methodology for the large-scale multi-period precedence-constrained knapsack problem: an application in the mining industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 12-20.
    16. Del Castillo, M. Fernanda & Dimitrakopoulos, Roussos, 2019. "Dynamically optimizing the strategic plan of mining complexes under supply uncertainty," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 83-93.
    17. Piccardi, Carlo & Calatroni, Lisa & Bertoni, Fabio, 2010. "Communities in Italian corporate networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(22), pages 5247-5258.
    18. Luciana Crosilla & Marco Malgarini, 2011. "Behavioural models for manufacturing firms: analysing survey data," ECONOMIA E POLITICA INDUSTRIALE, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2011(4), pages 139-163.
    19. Claudio Conversano & Massimo Cannas & Francesco Mola & Emiliano Sironi, 2019. "Random effects clustering in multilevel modeling: choosing a proper partition," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 13(1), pages 279-301, March.
    20. Devendra Joshi & Hamed Gholami & Hitesh Mohapatra & Anis Ali & Dalia Streimikiene & Susanta Kumar Satpathy & Arvind Yadav, 2022. "The Application of Stochastic Mine Production Scheduling in the Presence of Geological Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-19, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:9:y:2016:i:12:p:1059-:d:85273. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.