[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ene/journl/y2015p35-43.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The directions of the improvement of the environmental policy on waste management in Ukraine based on the respective EU experience

Author

Listed:
  • Tetiana Omelianenko

    (Public Institution "Institute of Environmental Economics and Sustainable Development of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine", Kyiv)

  • Yulia Makovetska

    (Public Institution "Institute of Environmental Economics and Sustainable Development of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine", Kyiv)

Abstract
At present an integrated approach of waste management has been introduced in the European Union, which is quite flexible in terms of responding to changes and new problems arising in this field. The main directions of the environmental policy of the European Union on waste and trends in this area have been determined in the article. The integration of the priorities in the sphere of waste management to the environmental policy documents of the EU (7th Environment Action programme) and the documents that define the main priorities for funding (Regulation (EC) 1303/2013) have been presented. The analysis of legislative regulation of waste of EU (including the latest innovations) and the major benchmarks has shown the need for the modification of Ukrainian legislation with European guidelines and policy in this area. The ways of improving our country's environmental policies on waste on the base of European experience have been justified.

Suggested Citation

  • Tetiana Omelianenko & Yulia Makovetska, 2015. "The directions of the improvement of the environmental policy on waste management in Ukraine based on the respective EU experience," Economics of Nature and the Environment, Mykhaylo Khvesyk, pages 35-43.
    • Handle: RePEc:ene:journl:y:2015:p:35-43
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://economics-of-nature.net/uploads/arhiv/2015/Omelianenko.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ene:journl:y:2015:p:35-43. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ludmila Shashula (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://economics-of-nature.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.