Author
AbstractLong-term existence of a number of social, economic, and environmental problems of rural territories in Ukraine stipulates the necessity of researches on features of their functioning and development as well as on searching of innovative businesses patterns in rural areas, on enhancement of social capital and improvement of the environment. Researches on how certain economic industries work in rural sites are of high importance, and first of all those concerning tourism and recreation being good alternatives to traditional agrarian industry. In the last two decades, the definitions of rural territories were transformed crucially, and analysis of theoretical and methodological principles of functioning and development of rural territories as integral socio-ecological-economical systems incorporates review and clarification of the definition. Nowadays there is no single theoretical-methodological and practical approach to interpret sense and principles of rural territories functioning both in Ukraine and outside. The majority of “rural territories†definitions try to incorporate as many aspects as possible, although comprehensive and multilevel definitions usually do not certainly provide clear vision of essential and specific characteristics of rural territories. Current conditions of rural development require to reject out-of-date approach to regard rural territories exclusively as resource basis for agrarian industry and accept conceptions which combine functions of social development with economically efficient multifunctional production and protection of environmentally sound status of rural territories. It is proposed to consider rural territories as an economic-geographical space that has appeared as a result of anthropogenic transformations of natural landscapes into complex multifunctional formation. Its key elements are spatial-resourceful basis for agrarian industry, natural surrounding, and live space for human society. In spite of diversity of applied approaches, the forming of paradigm of sustainable socio-ecological-economic development of rural territories stays urgent. Starting point for the paradigm is capability of rural territories for self-regulation of its vital functions being accompanied by market-oriented management over agrarian industry gets more and more attention. Taking into consideration higher levels of administration inhere in more complicated management, the tasks on elaboration of the national strategy of rural territories development and realization of unitary policy of the development of rural sites attract attention of economists and decision-makers.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ene:journl:y:2014:p:112-115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ludmila Shashula (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://economics-of-nature.net/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.