Author
Listed:
- Fiona Ann Robertson
- Martin Samy
AbstractPurpose - The purpose of this paper is to investigate rationales for integrated reporting ( ) adoption and factors that impact on the extent of adoption in the UK early adopter organisations. Diffusion of innovation theory was used as a guiding theoretical lens Design/methodology/approach - The study was based on in-depth semi-structured interviews with 36 senior executives actively involved in IR in finance, sustainability, communications and legal functions within seventeen organisations. A content analysis of the interviews was undertaken using qualitative coding techniques within Nvivo 11 software. Findings - Organisations drew on a wide range of rationales for adoption, with a predominance of sociological over economic rationales, both of which offered organisations a relative advantage over existing practices. Economically, emerged as an incremental process, which filled a performance gap is predominantly manufacturing and utility industries with significant impacts on the environment/society. Predominant sociological rationales were: external pressures, primarily due to perceptions of shifts in societal expectations; and internal aspirations relating to enhancing reputation. Findings also revealed that the framework was not fully adopted by the majority of organisations, primarily due to incompatibility with organisational requirements and/or perceived complexity of the framework. Research limitations/implications - This research study was limited by the small sample of organisations that participated, although significant efforts were made to ensure that the sample incorporated the majority of early adopter UK organisations who demonstrated best practice in . Practical implications - Recommendations on how the adoption of may be further enhanced in the future are outlined. Social implications - Research that provides recommendations to inform policy and practice regarding how could be more widely adopted, and its practices further diffused, within organisations is important given has the potential to contribute to societal and environmental well-being. Originality/value - This study is significant as research into adoption decision motivations and subsequent extent of adoption is scant, particularly in the UK. It responds to the call by Dumayet al.(2016) for researchers to engage more with practice. It further enriches prior research on the adoption of management innovations where an extensive body of innovation literature has focussed on the rationale for organisational adoption of management innovations but has neglected the subsequent extent of adoption.
Suggested Citation
Fiona Ann Robertson & Martin Samy, 2020.
"Rationales for integrated reporting adoption and factors impacting on the extent of adoption,"
Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(2), pages 351-382, January.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:sampjp:sampj-02-2019-0042
DOI: 10.1108/SAMPJ-02-2019-0042
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- PeiāChi Kelly Hsiao & Charl de Villiers & Claire Horner & Hein Oosthuizen, 2022.
"A review and synthesis of contemporary sustainability accounting research and the development of a research agenda,"
Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(4), pages 4453-4483, December.
- Syaiful Hifni, 2023.
"The Five Reporting Bottom Lines, Implementation of Integrated Reporting Towards Sustainable Development Management Accountability ,"
GATR Journals
afr228, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:sampjp:sampj-02-2019-0042. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.