[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/respol/v54y2025i1s0048733324001586.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

More risk-averse or more innovative? The effect of women board membership and aspirations on patent activity

Author

Listed:
  • Smulowitz, Stephen J.
  • Smulowitz, Małgorzata
  • Cossin, Didier
Abstract
Do women directors make firms more risk-averse or more innovative? We examine this question by predicting and showing that the effect of increasing women directors on the board on firm innovation output depends on the firm's performance relative to aspirations (PRA). Research based on the Behavioral Theory of the Firm (BTOF) has shown that the behavioral motives of firms to innovate depend on the firm's PRA, both positive and negative. However, who is interpreting the information that performance feedback provides could make a difference in PRA's effect. In contrast to traditional BTOF predictions, we theorize that, when performance is poor relative to aspirations and when the firm is close to failure, boards with more women directors will result in firms focusing more on survival, reducing innovation output. In contrast, when performance is high relative to aspirations and when the firm has increasing available slack, boards with more women will result in the firm taking advantage of the excess leeway that this provides, increasing innovation output. Using a panel dataset of patent data with 6118 observations for 524 firms from 1999 to 2016, we find strong empirical support for most of our predictions. Also, post hoc analyses show that for radical innovation (i.e., patents with citations in the top decile) the effect on risk-aversion is more prominent than the effect on innovation output.

Suggested Citation

  • Smulowitz, Stephen J. & Smulowitz, Małgorzata & Cossin, Didier, 2025. "More risk-averse or more innovative? The effect of women board membership and aspirations on patent activity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(1).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:respol:v:54:y:2025:i:1:s0048733324001586
    DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2024.105109
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733324001586
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.respol.2024.105109?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:respol:v:54:y:2025:i:1:s0048733324001586. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/respol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.