[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v92y2007i9p1155-1161.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methodology for identifying near-optimal interdiction strategies for a power transmission system

Author

Listed:
  • Bier, Vicki M.
  • Gratz, Eli R.
  • Haphuriwat, Naraphorn J.
  • Magua, Wairimu
  • Wierzbicki, Kevin R.
Abstract
Previous methods for assessing the vulnerability of complex systems to intentional attacks or interdiction have either not been adequate to deal with systems in which flow readjusts dynamically (such as electricity transmission systems), or have been complex and computationally difficult. We propose a relatively simple, inexpensive, and practical method (“Max Line†) for identifying promising interdiction strategies in such systems. The method is based on a greedy algorithm in which, at each iteration, the transmission line with the highest load is interdicted. We apply this method to sample electrical transmission systems from the Reliability Test System developed by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, and compare our method and results with those of other proposed approaches for vulnerability assessment. We also study the effectiveness of protecting those transmission lines identified as promising candidates for interdiction. These comparisons shed light on the relative merits of the various vulnerability assessment methods, as well as providing insights that can help to guide the allocation of scarce resources for defensive investment.

Suggested Citation

  • Bier, Vicki M. & Gratz, Eli R. & Haphuriwat, Naraphorn J. & Magua, Wairimu & Wierzbicki, Kevin R., 2007. "Methodology for identifying near-optimal interdiction strategies for a power transmission system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(9), pages 1155-1161.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:92:y:2007:i:9:p:1155-1161
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2006.08.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832006001712
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2006.08.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arun G. Phadke, 2004. "Hidden failures in electric power systems," International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(1), pages 64-75.
    2. L. Mili & Q. Qiu & A.G. Phadke, 2004. "Risk assessment of catastrophic failures in electric power systems," International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(1), pages 38-63.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zijun Qie & Lili Rong, 2017. "An integrated relative risk assessment model for urban disaster loss in view of disaster system theory," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 88(1), pages 165-190, August.
    2. Aven, Terje, 2013. "Practical implications of the new risk perspectives," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 136-145.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:92:y:2007:i:9:p:1155-1161. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.