[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceps/v87y2023ipas0038012123000149.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Human trafficking interdiction with decision dependent success

Author

Listed:
  • Tezcan, Barış
  • Maass, Kayse Lee
Abstract
This paper presents a bi-level network interdiction model to increase the effectiveness of attempting to disrupt a human trafficking network under a resource constrained environment. To model the behavior of the trafficker, we present a new interpretation of the traditional maximum flow network problem in which the arc capacity parameter serves as a proxy for the trafficker’s desirability to travel along segments of the network. The objective for the anti-human trafficking stakeholder is to invest resources in detection and intervention efforts throughout the network in a manner that minimizes the trafficker’s expected maximum desirability of operating on the network. Interdictions are binary, and their effects are stochastic (i.e., there is a positive probability that a disruption attempt is unsuccessful). We present a multi-stage version of the model, which incorporates the effect of interdictions becoming more or less successful over time. Using a genetic algorithm that uses a pseudo-utility ratio for the repair operation, we solve multiple problem instances for a case study of the road network in the Eastern Development Region of Nepal and multiple grid networks. We then discuss observations regarding the impact of probabilistic interdiction success and the implications it has for optimal policies to disrupt a human trafficking network with limited resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Tezcan, Barış & Maass, Kayse Lee, 2023. "Human trafficking interdiction with decision dependent success," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PA).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:87:y:2023:i:pa:s0038012123000149
    DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2023.101521
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038012123000149
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.seps.2023.101521?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nail Orkun Baycik & Thomas C. Sharkey & Chase E. Rainwater, 2018. "Interdicting layered physical and information flow networks," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(4), pages 316-331, April.
    2. Bhuiyan, Tanveer Hossain & Medal, Hugh R. & Harun, Sarah, 2020. "A stochastic programming model with endogenous and exogenous uncertainty for reliable network design under random disruption," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(2), pages 670-694.
    3. Danailova-Trainor, Gergana. & Belser, Patrick., 2006. "Globalization and the illicit market for human trafficking : an empirical analysis of supply and demand," ILO Working Papers 993953733402676, International Labour Organization.
    4. repec:ilo:ilowps:395339 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. repec:ilo:ilowps:395373 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Ajay Malaviya & Chase Rainwater & Thomas Sharkey, 2012. "Multi-period network interdiction problems with applications to city-level drug enforcement," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(5), pages 368-380.
    7. Fischetti, Matteo & Monaci, Michele & Sinnl, Markus, 2018. "A dynamic reformulation heuristic for Generalized Interdiction Problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(1), pages 40-51.
    8. Alper Atamtürk & Carlos Deck & Hyemin Jeon, 2020. "Successive Quadratic Upper-Bounding for Discrete Mean-Risk Minimization and Network Interdiction," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 32(2), pages 346-355, April.
    9. O’Hanley, Jesse R. & Scaparra, M. Paola & García, Sergio, 2013. "Probability chains: A general linearization technique for modeling reliability in facility location and related problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(1), pages 63-75.
    10. Konrad, Renata A. & Trapp, Andrew C. & Palmbach, Timothy M. & Blom, Jeffrey S., 2017. "Overcoming human trafficking via operations research and analytics: Opportunities for methods, models, and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(2), pages 733-745.
    11. Nedialko Dimitrov & Dennis Michalopoulos & David Morton & Michael Nehme & Feng Pan & Elmira Popova & Erich Schneider & Gregory Thoreson, 2011. "Network deployment of radiation detectors with physics-based detection probability calculations," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 187(1), pages 207-228, July.
    12. Zhang, Jing & Zhuang, Jun & Behlendorf, Brandon, 2018. "Stochastic shortest path network interdiction with a case study of Arizona–Mexico border," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 62-73.
    13. Kelly J. Cormican & David P. Morton & R. Kevin Wood, 1998. "Stochastic Network Interdiction," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 184-197, April.
    14. Hernandez, Diego & Rudolph, Alexandra, 2015. "Modern day slavery: What drives human trafficking in Europe?," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 118-139.
    15. Ronald Weitzer, 2014. "New Directions in Research on Human Trafficking," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 653(1), pages 6-24, May.
    16. Ketkov, Sergey S. & Prokopyev, Oleg A., 2020. "On greedy and strategic evaders in sequential interdiction settings with incomplete information," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    17. Juan S. Borrero & Oleg A. Prokopyev & Denis Sauré, 2016. "Sequential Shortest Path Interdiction with Incomplete Information," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 13(1), pages 68-98, March.
    18. Ramirez-Marquez, José Emmanuel & Rocco S., Claudio M., 2009. "Stochastic network interdiction optimization via capacitated network reliability modeling and probabilistic solution discovery," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(5), pages 913-921.
    19. Hugh R. Medal & Edward A. Pohl & Manuel D. Rossetti, 2016. "Allocating Protection Resources to Facilities When the Effect of Protection is Uncertain," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(3), pages 220-234, March.
    20. Danailova-Trainor, Gergana. & Belser, Patrick., 2006. "Globalization and the illicit market for human trafficking : an empirical analysis of supply and demand," ILO Working Papers 993953393402676, International Labour Organization.
    21. Dennis P. Michalopoulos & David P. Morton & J. Wesley Barnes, 2013. "Prioritizing Network Interdiction of Nuclear Smuggling," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Horand I Gassmann & William T Ziemba (ed.), Stochastic Programming Applications in Finance, Energy, Planning and Logistics, chapter 12, pages 313-346, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gürler, Hasan Emin & Özçalıcı, Mehmet & Pamucar, Dragan, 2024. "Determining criteria weights with genetic algorithms for multi-criteria decision making methods: The case of logistics performance index rankings of European Union countries," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Keskin, Burcu B. & Griffin, Emily C. & Prell, Jonathan O. & Dilkina, Bistra & Ferber, Aaron & MacDonald, John & Hilend, Rowan & Griffis, Stanley & Gore, Meredith L., 2023. "Quantitative Investigation of Wildlife Trafficking Supply Chains: A Review," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    2. Xiaodan Xie & Felipe Aros‐Vera, 2022. "An interdependent network interdiction model for disrupting sex trafficking networks," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(6), pages 2695-2713, June.
    3. Smith, J. Cole & Song, Yongjia, 2020. "A survey of network interdiction models and algorithms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(3), pages 797-811.
    4. Winkler,Stephen Joseph, 2021. "Human Trafficking: Definitions, Data, and Determinants," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9623, The World Bank.
    5. Kosmas, Daniel & Sharkey, Thomas C. & Mitchell, John E. & Maass, Kayse Lee & Martin, Lauren, 2023. "Interdicting restructuring networks with applications in illicit trafficking," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(2), pages 832-851.
    6. Beck, Yasmine & Ljubić, Ivana & Schmidt, Martin, 2023. "A survey on bilevel optimization under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(2), pages 401-426.
    7. Majeed, Muhammad Tariq & Malik, Amna, 2017. "Selling Souls: An Empirical Analysis of Human Trafficking and Globalization," MPRA Paper 88850, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Abumoslem Mohammadi & Javad Tayyebi, 2019. "Maximum Capacity Path Interdiction Problem with Fixed Costs," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 36(04), pages 1-21, August.
    9. Rauscher, Michael & Willert, Bianca, 2020. "Modern slavery, corruption, and hysteresis," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    10. Michael Rauscher & Bianca Willert, 2019. "Slavery, Corruption, and Institutions," CESifo Working Paper Series 7944, CESifo.
    11. Rauscher, Michael & Willert, Bianca, 2019. "Slavery, corruption, and institutions," Thuenen-Series of Applied Economic Theory 164, University of Rostock, Institute of Economics.
    12. Willert, Bianca, 2021. "Modern Slavery – An Empirical Analysis," Thuenen-Series of Applied Economic Theory 167, University of Rostock, Institute of Economics, revised 2021.
    13. Enayaty-Ahangar, Forough & Rainwater, Chase E. & Sharkey, Thomas C., 2019. "A Logic-based Decomposition Approach for Multi-Period Network Interdiction Models," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 71-85.
    14. Shen, Yeming & Sharkey, Thomas C. & Szymanski, Boleslaw K. & Wallace, William (Al), 2021. "Interdicting interdependent contraband smuggling, money and money laundering networks," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    15. Burcu B. Keskin & Gregory J. Bott & Nickolas K. Freeman, 2021. "Cracking Sex Trafficking: Data Analysis, Pattern Recognition, and Path Prediction," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(4), pages 1110-1135, April.
    16. Jabarzare, Ziba & Zolfagharinia, Hossein & Najafi, Mehdi, 2020. "Dynamic interdiction networks with applications in illicit supply chains," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    17. Juan S. Borrero & Leonardo Lozano, 2021. "Modeling Defender-Attacker Problems as Robust Linear Programs with Mixed-Integer Uncertainty Sets," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 1570-1589, October.
    18. Cho, Seo-Young & Dreher, Axel & Neumayer, Eric, 2013. "Does Legalized Prostitution Increase Human Trafficking?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 67-82.
    19. Bhuiyan, Tanveer Hossain & Medal, Hugh R. & Harun, Sarah, 2020. "A stochastic programming model with endogenous and exogenous uncertainty for reliable network design under random disruption," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(2), pages 670-694.
    20. Nguyen, Di H. & Smith, J. Cole, 2022. "Network interdiction with asymmetric cost uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(1), pages 239-251.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:87:y:2023:i:pa:s0038012123000149. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/seps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.