0.05); (3) Small towns perform well in terms of economic density, which is not significantly different from small and medium-sized cities, but significantly lower than large cities with population of municipal district > 1 million. These findings challenge the stereotypes of towns in driving urbanization. The authors argue that the economic development level, input-output efficiency and economic density of small towns can also be high, shaping their important role in integrating urban and rural development, accelerating new-type urbanization and promoting rural vitalization strategy."> 0.05); (3) Small towns perform well in terms of economic density, which is not significantly different from small and medium-sized cities, but significantly lower than large cities with population of municipal district > 1 million. These findings challenge the stereotypes of towns in driving urbanization. The authors argue that the economic development level, input-output efficiency and economic density of small towns can also be high, shaping their important role in integrating urban and rural development, accelerating new-type urbanization and promoting rural vitalization strategy.">
[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v109y2021ics0264837721003136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are small towns really inefficient? A data envelopment analysis of sampled towns in Jiangsu province, China

Author

Listed:
  • Yin, Xu
  • Wang, Jing
  • Li, Yurui
  • Feng, Zhiming
  • Wang, Qianyi
Abstract
Small towns, the nodes connecting cities and villages, play an important role in urbanization and rural development. However, it is generally believed that small towns lack economic efficiency therefore are excluded from main-stream urbanization of China. Based on the socio-economic statistics of 109 towns in 7 counties of Jiangsu province, this paper evaluates the DEA efficiency of small towns with different classifications, and compares the DEA efficiency of small towns with 21 county-towns, then analyzes the economic density of small towns and 283 prefecture-level cities with different scales. The results show that: (1) There are significant differences in the efficiency characteristics of different types of towns. Approximately 80% of the sampled towns could improve their efficiency by intensive resource-use and production scale expansion; (2) Although county-towns obtained more resources, their efficiency is not significantly superior than other types of towns (P > 0.05); (3) Small towns perform well in terms of economic density, which is not significantly different from small and medium-sized cities, but significantly lower than large cities with population of municipal district > 1 million. These findings challenge the stereotypes of towns in driving urbanization. The authors argue that the economic development level, input-output efficiency and economic density of small towns can also be high, shaping their important role in integrating urban and rural development, accelerating new-type urbanization and promoting rural vitalization strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Yin, Xu & Wang, Jing & Li, Yurui & Feng, Zhiming & Wang, Qianyi, 2021. "Are small towns really inefficient? A data envelopment analysis of sampled towns in Jiangsu province, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:109:y:2021:i:c:s0264837721003136
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105590
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837721003136
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105590?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pérez-López, Gemma & Prior, Diego & Zafra-Gómez, José L., 2018. "Temporal scale efficiency in DEA panel data estimations. An application to the solid waste disposal service in Spain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 18-27.
    2. Emrouznejad, Ali & Yang, Guo-liang, 2018. "A survey and analysis of the first 40 years of scholarly literature in DEA: 1978–2016," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 4-8.
    3. Brülhart, Marius & Mathys, Nicole A., 2008. "Sectoral agglomeration economies in a panel of European regions," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 348-362, July.
    4. Tony Binns & Etienne Nel, 2003. "The Village in a Game Park: Local Response to the Demise of Coal Mining in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 79(1), pages 41-66, January.
    5. Wanke, Peter & Barros, C.P. & Figueiredo, Otávio, 2016. "Efficiency and productive slacks in urban transportation modes: A two-stage SDEA-Beta Regression approach," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 31-39.
    6. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    7. Qian, Zhu & Xue, Jianhong, 2017. "Small town urbanization in Western China: Villager resettlement and integration in Xi’an," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 152-159.
    8. Willem Korthals Altes & Sang Bong Im, 2011. "Promoting Rural Development through the Use of Land Consolidation: The Case of Korea," International Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 151-167.
    9. Liu, Yansui, 2018. "Introduction to land use and rural sustainability in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 1-4.
    10. Loris Servillo & Rob Atkinson & Abdelillah Hamdouch & Loris Servillo & Rob Atkinson & Abdelillah Hamdouch, 2017. "Small and Medium-Sized Towns in Europe: Conceptual, Methodological and Policy Issues," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 108(4), pages 365-379, September.
    11. Francesca Governa & Angelo Sampieri, 2020. "Urbanisation processes and new towns in contemporary China: A critical understanding from a decentred view," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(2), pages 366-382, February.
    12. Choi, Chang Gyu & Lee, Sugie & Kim, Heungsoon & Seong, Eun Yeong, 2019. "Critical junctures and path dependence in urban planning and housing policy: A review of greenbelts and New Towns in Korea’s Seoul metropolitan area," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 195-204.
    13. David Kaufmann & Stefan Wittwer, 2019. "Business centre or bedroom community? The development of employment in small and medium-sized towns," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(10), pages 1483-1493, October.
    14. Paul Courtney & Denis L�picier & Bertrand Schmitt, 2008. "Spatial Patterns of Production Linkages in the Context of Europe's Small Towns: How Are Rural Firms Linked to the Local Economy?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(3), pages 355-374, April.
    15. Cuevas, Antonio & Febrero, Manuel & Fraiman, Ricardo, 2004. "An anova test for functional data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 111-122, August.
    16. Bill Pritchard & Neil Argent & Scott Baum & Lisa Bourke & John Martin & Phil Mcmanus & Anthony Sorensen & Jim Walmsley, 2012. "Local -- If Possible: How the Spatial Networking of Economic Relations amongst Farm Enterprises Aids Small Town Survival in Rural Australia," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(4), pages 539-557, June.
    17. Zhang, Zhengfeng & Liu, Jing & Gu, Xiaokun, 2019. "Reduction of industrial land beyond Urban Development Boundary in Shanghai: Differences in policy responses and impact on towns and villages," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 620-630.
    18. R. D. Banker & A. Charnes & W. W. Cooper, 1984. "Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(9), pages 1078-1092, September.
    19. Tone, Kaoru, 2001. "A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(3), pages 498-509, May.
    20. Majid Azadi & Reza Farzipoor Saen, 2012. "Developing a new chance-constrained DEA model for suppliers selection in the presence of undesirable outputs," International Journal of Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(1), pages 44-66.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yazhu Wang & Hui Zou & Xuejun Duan & Lingqing Wang, 2022. "Coordinated Evolution and Influencing Factors of Population and Economy in the Yangtze River Economic Belt," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-19, November.
    2. Zhi Qiu & Yue Wang & Jie Wang & Zhu Wang & Yi Zhou, 2023. "Needs Hierarchy for Public Service Facilities and Guidance-Control Programming in Small Chinese Towns Influenced by Complex Urbanization of Residents: The Evidence from Zhejiang," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-27, June.
    3. Marcin Bogdański & Marcin Janusz, 2022. "Small Towns’ Functions as a Determinant of the Standard of Living in Rural Areas—An Example from Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-21, October.
    4. Yongfang Peng & Yingying Fan & Yi Liang, 2021. "A Green Technological Innovation Efficiency Evaluation of Technology-Based SMEs Based on the Undesirable SBM and the Malmquist Index: A Case of Hebei Province in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-19, October.
    5. Dekai Tao & Wenli Zhou, 2022. "An Evaluation and Optimization of Green Development Strategy for the Nanjing-Hangzhou Eco-Economic Zone in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-24, December.
    6. Xiao Gong & Xiaolin Zhang & Jieyi Tao & Hongbo Li & Yunrui Zhang, 2022. "An Evaluation of the Development Performance of Small County Towns and Its Influencing Factors: A Case Study of Small Towns in Jiangyin City in the Yangtze River Delta, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-22, July.
    7. Wang, Jieyong & Qu, Lulu & Li, Yurui & Feng, Weilun, 2023. "Identifying the structure of rural regional system and implications for rural revitalization: A case study of Yanchi County in northern China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Junlong Li & Chuangneng Cai & Feng Zhang, 2020. "Assessment of Ecological Efficiency and Environmental Sustainability of the Minjiang-Source in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-15, June.
    2. Mahmoudi, Reza & Emrouznejad, Ali & Shetab-Boushehri, Seyyed-Nader & Hejazi, Seyed Reza, 2020. "The origins, development and future directions of data envelopment analysis approach in transportation systems," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    3. Abbas Mardani & Dalia Streimikiene & Tomas Balezentis & Muhamad Zameri Mat Saman & Khalil Md Nor & Seyed Meysam Khoshnava, 2018. "Data Envelopment Analysis in Energy and Environmental Economics: An Overview of the State-of-the-Art and Recent Development Trends," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-21, August.
    4. Michal PlaÄ ek & Milan Křápek & Jan ÄŒadil & Bojka Hamerníková, 2020. "The Influence of Excellence on Municipal Performance: Quasi-Experimental Evidence From the Czech Republic," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, December.
    5. Kai Xu & Bart Bossink & Qiang Chen, 2019. "Efficiency Evaluation of Regional Sustainable Innovation in China: A Slack-Based Measure (SBM) Model with Undesirable Outputs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, December.
    6. Tatiana Bencova & Andrea Bohacikova, 2022. "DEA in Performance Measurement of Two-Stage Processes: Comparative Overview of the Literature," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 5, pages 111-129.
    7. Suvvari Anandarao & S. Raja Sethu Durai & Phanindra Goyari, 2019. "Efficiency Decomposition in two-stage Data Envelopment Analysis: An application to Life Insurance companies in India," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 17(2), pages 271-285, June.
    8. Hatami-Marbini, Adel & Arabmaldar, Aliasghar, 2021. "Robustness of Farrell cost efficiency measurement under data perturbations: Evidence from a US manufacturing application," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(2), pages 604-620.
    9. Arabmaldar, Aliasghar & Sahoo, Biresh K. & Ghiyasi, Mojtaba, 2023. "A generalized robust data envelopment analysis model based on directional distance function," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(2), pages 617-632.
    10. Camanho, Ana Santos & Silva, Maria Conceicao & Piran, Fabio Sartori & Lacerda, Daniel Pacheco, 2024. "A literature review of economic efficiency assessments using Data Envelopment Analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(1), pages 1-18.
    11. Rafael Benítez & Vicente Coll-Serrano & Vicente J. Bolós, 2021. "deaR-Shiny: An Interactive Web App for Data Envelopment Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-19, June.
    12. Cossani, Gianfranco & Codoceo, Loreto & Cáceres, Hernán & Tabilo, Jorge, 2022. "Technical efficiency in Chile’s higher education system: A comparison of rankings and accreditation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    13. Mishra, Neelesh Kumar & Chakraborty, Abhishek & Singh, Sanjeet & Ranjan, Prabhat, 2023. "Efficiency analysis of engineering colleges in India: Decomposition into parallel sub-processes systems," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    14. Kohl, Sebastian & Brunner, Jens O., 2020. "Benchmarking the benchmarks – Comparing the accuracy of Data Envelopment Analysis models in constant returns to scale settings," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 1042-1057.
    15. Qunwei Wang & Ye Hang & Jin‐Li Hu & Ching‐Ren Chiu, 2018. "An alternative metafrontier framework for measuring the heterogeneity of technology," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 65(5), pages 427-445, August.
    16. Pilar Alberca & Laura Parte, 2020. "Efficiency in the Holiday and Other Short-Stay Accommodation Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-22, November.
    17. Ján Dobrovič & Veronika Čabinová & Peter Gallo & Petra Partlová & Jan Váchal & Beáta Balogová & Jozef Orgonáš, 2021. "Application of the DEA Model in Tourism SMEs: An Empirical Study from Slovakia in the Context of Business Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-19, July.
    18. Jiyoung Lee & Gyunghyun Choi, 2019. "A Dominance-Based Network Method for Ranking Efficient Decision-Making Units in Data Envelopment Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-20, April.
    19. Franz R. Hahn, 2007. "Determinants of Bank Efficiency in Europe. Assessing Bank Performance Across Markets," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 31499.
    20. Yongqi Feng & Haolin Zhang & Yung-ho Chiu & Tzu-Han Chang, 2021. "Innovation efficiency and the impact of the institutional quality: a cross-country analysis using the two-stage meta-frontier dynamic network DEA model," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(4), pages 3091-3129, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:109:y:2021:i:c:s0264837721003136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.