[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jotrge/v27y2013icp4-13.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Governing the European port–city interface: institutional impacts on spatial projects between city and port

Author

Listed:
  • Daamen, Tom A.
  • Vries, Isabelle
Abstract
Sustainability agendas are challenging port authorities around the world to find ways to use port assets more efficiently and productively in economic, social, as well as environmental terms. To this end, one of the most strategic port assets is the port–city interface – waterfront zones in which the geography of the port and its city meet each other. In this paper, we explore the relationship between the institutions and governance processes behind spatial projects currently taking place in the interface of four European port cities: Marseille, Barcelona, Hamburg, and Rotterdam. Results show that laws and regulations dominate the spatial outcomes of governance processes between city and port, and that these tend to frustrate experimental efforts towards truly sustainable results. In addition, development orientations that foresee an on-going port migration process away from the urban core are still common among urban planning and policy makers, which impedes on the joint governance processes needed for building renewed, sustainable port–city relations and spatial projects. Contours of such a joint governance process have only been found in the Rotterdam case.

Suggested Citation

  • Daamen, Tom A. & Vries, Isabelle, 2013. "Governing the European port–city interface: institutional impacts on spatial projects between city and port," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 4-13.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:27:y:2013:i:c:p:4-13
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.03.013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692312000762
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.03.013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel Olivier & Brian Slack, 2006. "Rethinking the Port," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 38(8), pages 1409-1427, August.
    2. Wiegmans, Bart W. & Louw, Erik, 2011. "Changing port–city relations at Amsterdam: A new phase at the interface?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 575-583.
    3. Edwin Buitelaar & Arnoud Lagendijk & Wouter Jacobs, 2007. "A Theory of Institutional Change: Illustrated by Dutch City-Provinces and Dutch Land Policy," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(4), pages 891-908, April.
    4. Adolf K Y Ng & Athanasios A Pallis, 2010. "Port Governance Reforms in Diversified Institutional Frameworks: Generic Solutions, Implementation Asymmetries," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 42(9), pages 2147-2167, September.
    5. Sara González & Patsy Healey, 2005. "A Sociological Institutionalist Approach to the Study of Innovation in Governance Capacity," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(11), pages 2055-2069, October.
    6. Keith Bassett & Ron Griffiths & Ian Smith, 2002. "Testing Governance: Partnerships, Planning and Conflict in Waterfront Regeneration," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(10), pages 1757-1775, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Notteboom, Theo & De Langen, Peter & Jacobs, Wouter, 2013. "Institutional plasticity and path dependence in seaports: interactions between institutions, port governance reforms and port authority routines," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 26-35.
    2. Wang, Haizhuang, 2014. "Preliminary investigation of waterfront redevelopment in Chinese coastal port cities: the case of the eastern Dalian port areas," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 29-42.
    3. Monios, Jason & Lambert, Bruce, 2013. "The Heartland Intermodal Corridor: public private partnerships and the transformation of institutional settings," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 36-45.
    4. Koi Yu Adolf Ng & César Ducruet, 2014. "The changing tides of port geography (1950–2012)," Post-Print halshs-01359160, HAL.
    5. Adolf K. Y. Ng & Kenneth Wong & Eva C. Shou & Changmin Jiang, 2019. "Geography and institutional change: insights from a container terminal operator," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 21(3), pages 334-352, September.
    6. Ng, Adolf K.Y. & Ducruet, César & Jacobs, Wouter & Monios, Jason & Notteboom, Theo & Rodrigue, Jean-Paul & Slack, Brian & Tam, Ka-chai & Wilmsmeier, Gordon, 2014. "Port geography at the crossroads with human geography: between flows and spaces," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 84-96.
    7. Hatani, Faith, 2016. "Institutional plasticity in public-private interactions: Why Japan’s port reform failed," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 51(6), pages 923-936.
    8. Wilmsmeier, Gordon & Monios, Jason & Pérez-Salas, Gabriel, 2014. "Port system evolution – the case of Latin America and the Caribbean," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 208-221.
    9. Vonck, Indra & Notteboom, Theo, 2016. "Panarchy within a port setting," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 308-315.
    10. Notteboom, Theo, 2016. "The adaptive capacity of container ports in an era of mega vessels: The case of upstream seaports Antwerp and Hamburg," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 295-309.
    11. Parola, Francesco & Pallis, Athanasios A. & Risitano, Marcello & Ferretti, Marco, 2018. "Marketing strategies of Port Authorities: A multi-dimensional theorisation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 199-212.
    12. Rye, Tom & Monios, Jason & Hrelja, Robert & Isaksson, Karolina, 2018. "The relationship between formal and informal institutions for governance of public transport," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 196-206.
    13. Dooms, Michael & Verbeke, Alain & Haezendonck, Elvira, 2013. "Stakeholder management and path dependence in large-scale transport infrastructure development: the port of Antwerp case (1960–2010)," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 14-25.
    14. Witte, Patrick & Slack, Brian & Keesman, Maarten & Jugie, Jeanne-Hélène & Wiegmans, Bart, 2018. "Facilitating start-ups in port-city innovation ecosystems: A case study of Montreal and Rotterdam," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 224-234.
    15. Soppé, Martin & Parola, Francesco & Frémont, Antoine, 2009. "Emerging inter-industry partnerships between shipping lines and stevedores: from rivalry to cooperation?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 10-20.
    16. Cong, Long-ze & Zhang, Dong & Wang, Ming-li & Xu, Hong-feng & Li, Li, 2020. "The role of ports in the economic development of port cities: Panel evidence from China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 13-21.
    17. Wu, Zhen & Woo, Su-Han & Lai, Po-Lin & Chen, Xiaoyi, 2022. "The economic impact of inland ports on regional development: Evidence from the Yangtze River region," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 80-91.
    18. Moreira, Paulo Pires, 2012. "A Análise De Sines Como Ativo Geoestratégico Nacional: Um Cluster Suportado Nas Redes Marítimas Mundiais [The Analysis of Sines as a Geostrategic Asset: A Cluster Supported in the Maritime Chain]," MPRA Paper 47694, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 04 Oct 2012.
    19. Yang, Zaili & Ng, Adolf K.Y. & Wang, Jin, 2014. "A new risk quantification approach in port facility security assessment," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 72-90.
    20. Dinghuan Yuan & Yung Yau & Haijun Bao & Yongshen Liu & Ting Liu, 2019. "Anatomizing the Institutional Arrangements of Urban Village Redevelopment: Case Studies in Guangzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-16, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:27:y:2013:i:c:p:4-13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-transport-geography .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.