[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/foreco/v20y2014i4p380-395.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public support for forestry from EU funds – Cases of Czech Republic and Slovak Republic

Author

Listed:
  • Jarský, Vilém
  • Sarvašová, Zuzana
  • Dobšinská, Zuzana
  • Ventrubová, Kateřina
  • Sarvaš, Milan
Abstract
Rural development policy in the European Union (EU) has been implemented through different instruments. This paper is focused on support for the forestry sector from the EU funds in the years 2004–2006 in two EU Member States – Czech Republic (CZ) and Slovakia (SK). The comparison of support for forestry activities from the EU funds, delivered through the implementation of National Operational Programmes, showed differences at country level. Both countries had the opportunity to apply for support based on common EU policy, but they were able to select measures that reflected their specific needs and priorities at national level. Within Operational Programmes the following indicators were evaluated: description of forestry measures, financial support, number of applications, beneficiaries, outcomes and impacts. The comparison of financial support showed that the greater part of support in SK was granted to non-profit investments, whereas in CZ into profit making investments. The main difference was in the interest shown by applicants for support. In CZ nearly 80% of submitted applications were approved compared to 59% in SK. The analysis showed that the main reason for differences in utilisation of available sources was that different principles were applied when selecting supported measures or defining the activities to be supported within the measure.

Suggested Citation

  • Jarský, Vilém & Sarvašová, Zuzana & Dobšinská, Zuzana & Ventrubová, Kateřina & Sarvaš, Milan, 2014. "Public support for forestry from EU funds – Cases of Czech Republic and Slovak Republic," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 380-395.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:foreco:v:20:y:2014:i:4:p:380-395
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jfe.2014.10.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S110468991400049X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jfe.2014.10.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Scheeder, Thomas & Moog, Martin & Borchert, Herbert, 2002. "Bureaucratic financial burdens on privately owned forest companies: Results of a case study in three German federal states," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 4(1), pages 21-31, May.
    2. Buttoud, Gerard, 2006. "Forest policy evaluation in Europe : State of art," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(5), pages 499-501, July.
    3. Slee, Bill, 2006. "The socio-economic evaluation of the impact of forestry on rural development: A regional level analysis," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(5), pages 542-554, July.
    4. Forstner, R. & Grajewski, R. & Mehl, P., 2003. "Evaluation von Politikmaßnahmen zur Förderung ländlicher Räume: Theorie und Praxis," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 38.
    5. Bisang, Kurt & Zimmermann, Willi, 2006. "Key concepts and methods of programme evaluation and conclusions from forestry practice in Switzerland," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(5), pages 502-511, July.
    6. Elands, Birgit H. M. & Wiersum, K. Freerk, 2001. "Forestry and rural development in Europe: an exploration of socio-political discourses," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(1-2), pages 5-16, September.
    7. Salka, Jaroslav & Longauer, Roman & Lacko, Milan, 2006. "The effects of property transformation on forestry entrepreneurship and innovation in the context of Slovakia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(7), pages 716-724, October.
    8. Unknown, 2009. "Multifunctional agriculture and rural development," Economics of Agriculture, Institute of Agricultural Economics, vol. 56(1).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Quiroga, Sonia & Suarez, Cristina & Ficko, Andrej & Feliciano, Diana & Bouriaud, Laura & Brahic, Elodie & Deuffic, Philippe & Dobsinska, Zuzana & Jarsky, Vilem & Lawrence, Anna & Nybakk, Erlend, 2019. "What influences European private forest owners' affinity for subsidies?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 136-144.
    2. Lenka Halušková, 2022. "The Slovak forest policy arrangement: Post-1989 residues and changes," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 68(10), pages 395-412.
    3. Sarvašová, Zuzana & Ali, Tamás & Đorđević, Ilija & Lukmine, Diana & Quiroga, Sonia & Suárez, Cristina & Hrib, Michal & Rondeux, Jacques & Mantzanas, Konstantinos T. & Franz, Kristin, 2019. "Natura 2000 payments for private forest owners in Rural Development Programmes 2007–2013 - a comparative view," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 123-135.
    4. Petr Klusáček & Petr Dvořák & Jakub Trojan, 2023. "Revitalising Rural Spaces: Lessons Learnt from Brownfield Regeneration in a Shrinking Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-25, December.
    5. Palátová, P. & Rinn, R. & Machoň, M. & Paluš, H. & Purwestri, R.C. & Jarský, V., 2023. "Sharing economy in the forestry sector: Opportunities and barriers," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    6. Jarský, Vilém, 2015. "Analysis of the sectoral innovation system for forestry of the Czech Republic. Does it even exist?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 56-65.
    7. Dobšinská, Zuzana & Živojinović, Ivana & Nedeljković, Jelena & Petrović, Nenad & Jarský, Vilém & Oliva, Jiří & Šálka, Jaroslav & Sarvašová, Zuzana & Weiss, Gerhard, 2020. "Actor power in the restitution processes of forests in three European countries in transition," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    8. Haeler, Elena & Bolte, Andreas & Buchacher, Rafael & Hänninen, Harri & Jandl, Robert & Juutinen, Artti & Kuhlmey, Katharina & Kurttila, Mikko & Lidestav, Gun & Mäkipää, Raisa & Rosenkranz, Lydia & Tri, 2023. "Forest subsidy distribution in five European countries," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jarský, Vilém, 2015. "Analysis of the sectoral innovation system for forestry of the Czech Republic. Does it even exist?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 56-65.
    2. McDonagh John & Farrell Maura & Mahon Marie & Ryan Mary, 2010. "New opportunities and cautionary steps? Farmers, forestry and rural development in Ireland," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 2(4), pages 236-251, January.
    3. Márcio Lopes Pimenta & Éderson Luiz Piato & Luiz Henrique de Barros Vilas Boas & Stella Naomi Moriguchi, 2012. "Flavor and wellbeing: relationship between product's attributes and consumers’ personal values of regional coffee brands," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 9(3), pages 119-140, July.
    4. Khalid Hafeez & Pantea Foroudi & Keith Dinnie & Bang Nguyen & Sanjai K Parahoo, 2016. "The role of place branding and image in the development of sectoral clusters: The case of Dubai," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(4), pages 383-402, July.
    5. Magdalena Smiglak-Krajewska & Julia Wojciechowska-Solis, 2021. "Environmental Awareness of Farmers vs. Agricultural Sustainability," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 161-172.
    6. Martins, A. & Novais, A. & Santos, J.L. & Canadas, M.J., 2021. "Experts’ multiple criteria evaluations of fuel management options to reduce wildfire susceptibility. The role of closer knowledge of the local socioeconomic context," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    7. Živojinović, I. & Weiss, G. & Wilding, M. & Wong, J.L.G. & Ludvig, A., 2020. "Experiencing forest products – An innovation trend by rural entrepreneurs," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    8. Anastasia Nikoli & Fotini Zigouri, 2011. "Regional identities and competitiveness in a globalised environment: New challenges for Greek regions," ERSA conference papers ersa11p897, European Regional Science Association.
    9. YIlmaz, Bülent & Dasdemir, Ismet & Atmis, Erdogan & Lise, Wietze, 2010. "Factors affecting rural development in turkey: BartIn case study," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 239-249, April.
    10. Hoogstra, Marjanke A. & Schanz, Heiner & Freerk Wiersum, K., 2004. "The future of European forestry--between urbanization and rural development," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 6(5), pages 441-445, August.
    11. Richard PEK & Marcel RIEDL & Vilém JARSKÝ, 2017. "Innovative approaches in forest management - the application of a business model to designing a small-scale forestry strategy," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(9), pages 393-400.
    12. Katarina Haugen, 2016. "Contested Lands? Dissonance and Common Ground in Stakeholder Views on Forest Values," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 107(4), pages 421-434, September.
    13. Cavicchi, Alessio & Rinaldi, Chiara & Corsi, Michele, 2013. "Higher Education Institutions as Managers of Wicked Problems: Place Branding and Rural Development in Marche Region, Italy," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 16(A), pages 1-18.
    14. Minetos, Dionysios & Polyzos, Serafeim, 2010. "Deforestation processes in Greece: A spatial analysis by using an ordinal regression model," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(6), pages 457-472, July.
    15. Selby, Ashley & Koskela, Terhi & Petajisto, Leena, 2007. "Evidence of lay and professional forest-based development discourses in three contrasting regions of Finland," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(6), pages 633-646, February.
    16. Elands, Birgit H. M. & O'Leary, Tomas N. & Boerwinkel, Henk W. J. & Freerk Wiersum, K., 2004. "Forests as a mirror of rural conditions; local views on the role of forests across Europe," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 6(5), pages 469-482, August.
    17. MIhailovic, Branko & Cvijanovic, Drago, 2016. "Transfer of Knowledge and Innovation as a Model of Rural Development of Smederevo Region in Serbia," Rural Areas and Development, European Rural Development Network (ERDN), vol. 13, pages 1-20.
    18. Mihailovic, Branko & Tepavac, Rajko & Kovacevic, Maja, 2012. "Application Of Factor Analysis In Evaluation Of The Consulting Development In Serbia," Economics of Agriculture, Institute of Agricultural Economics, vol. 59(2), pages 1-14, July.
    19. Manuschevich, Daniela, 2016. "Neoliberalization of forestry discourses in Chile," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 21-30.
    20. Ludvig, Alice & Weiss, Gerhard & Sarkki, Simo & Nijnik, Maria & Živojinović, Ivana, 2018. "Mapping European and forest related policies supporting social innovation for rural settings," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 146-152.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Programme evaluation; Rural development policy; Forestry; Support measure; Czech Republic; Slovakia;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q23 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Forestry
    • Q28 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Government Policy
    • R51 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Finance in Urban and Rural Economies

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:foreco:v:20:y:2014:i:4:p:380-395. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/701775/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.