[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecmode/v33y2013icp182-186.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating most productive scale size with double frontiers data envelopment analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Ying-Ming
  • Lan, Yi-Xin
Abstract
In this paper, most productive scale size (MPSS) for input and output mixes is measured from pessimistic point of view by using pessimistic data envelopment analysis (DEA). It is proved that the decision making unit (DMU) with the maximum pessimistic efficiency represents MPSS. However, the optimistic and the pessimistic measurements may identify different DMU as MPSS. To find the optimal DMU that represents MPSS, a double frontiers approach is developed by using the Hurwicz criterion to integrate both the information on the optimistic and the pessimistic frontiers. Numerical examples are provided to show the applications of the proposed methods in estimating MPSS.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Ying-Ming & Lan, Yi-Xin, 2013. "Estimating most productive scale size with double frontiers data envelopment analysis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 182-186.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecmode:v:33:y:2013:i:c:p:182-186
    DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2013.04.021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264999313001521
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.econmod.2013.04.021?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Banker, Rajiv D. & Thrall, R. M., 1992. "Estimation of returns to scale using data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 74-84, October.
    2. Y M Wang & K S Chin & J B Yang, 2007. "Measuring the performances of decision-making units using geometric average efficiency," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(7), pages 929-937, July.
    3. Banker, Rajiv D., 1984. "Estimating most productive scale size using data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 35-44, July.
    4. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    5. Banker, Rajiv D. & Cooper, William W. & Seiford, Lawrence M. & Thrall, Robert M. & Zhu, Joe, 2004. "Returns to scale in different DEA models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(2), pages 345-362, April.
    6. Cook, Wade D. & Seiford, Larry M., 2009. "Data envelopment analysis (DEA) - Thirty years on," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(1), pages 1-17, January.
    7. R. D. Banker & A. Charnes & W. W. Cooper, 1984. "Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(9), pages 1078-1092, September.
    8. Khodabakhshi, M., 2009. "Estimating most productive scale size with stochastic data in data envelopment analysis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 26(5), pages 968-973, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Güner, Samet & Cebeci, Halil İbrahim & Antunes, Jorge Junio Moreira & Wanke, Peter F., 2021. "Sustainable efficiency drivers in Eurasian airports: Fuzzy NDEA approach based on Shannon's entropy," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    2. Shabani, Mohadeseh & Kordrostami, Sohrab & Jahani Sayyad Noveiri, Monireh, 2023. "Renewable energy performance analysis using fuzzy dynamic directional distance function model under natural and managerial disposability," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 352(C).
    3. Manuel Mocholi-Arce & Trinidad Gómez & Maria Molinos-Senante & Ramon Sala-Garrido & Rafael Caballero, 2020. "Evaluating the Eco-Efficiency of Wastewater Treatment Plants: Comparison of Optimistic and Pessimistic Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-13, December.
    4. A. Davoodi & M. Zarepisheh & H. Rezai, 2015. "The nearest MPSS pattern in data envelopment analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 226(1), pages 163-176, March.
    5. Lei Chen & Fei-Mei Wu & Feng Feng & Fujun Lai & Ying-Ming Wang, 2018. "A Common Set of Weights for Ranking Decision-Making Units with Undesirable Outputs: A Double Frontiers Data Envelopment Analysis Approach," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 35(06), pages 1-25, December.
    6. Embaye, Weldensie T. & Bergtold, Jason S., 2017. "Effect of Crop Insurance Subsidy on Total Farm Productivity of Kansas Farms, US," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258107, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    7. Eshagh Esfandiar & Robabeh Eslami & Mohammad Khoveyni & Alireza Gilani, 2023. "Identifying the closest most productive scale size unit in data envelopment analysis," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 45(2), pages 623-660, June.
    8. Afzalinejad, Mohammad, 2020. "Reverse efficiency measures for environmental assessment in data envelopment analysis," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lampe, Hannes W. & Hilgers, Dennis, 2015. "Trajectories of efficiency measurement: A bibliometric analysis of DEA and SFA," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(1), pages 1-21.
    2. da Silva, Aneirson Francisco & Miranda, Rafael de Carvalho & Marins, Fernando Augusto Silva & Dias, Erica Ximenes, 2024. "A new multiple criteria data envelopment analysis with variable return to scale: Applying bi-dimensional representation and super-efficiency analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(1), pages 308-322.
    3. Zarepisheh, M. & Soleimani-damaneh, M., 2009. "A dual simplex-based method for determination of the right and left returns to scale in DEA," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 194(2), pages 585-591, April.
    4. Taleb, Mushtaq & Khalid, Ruzelan & Ramli, Razamin & Ghasemi, Mohammad Reza & Ignatius, Joshua, 2022. "An integrated bi-objective data envelopment analysis model for measuring returns to scale," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 296(3), pages 967-979.
    5. Cesaroni, Giovanni & Kerstens, Kristiaan & Van de Woestyne, Ignace, 2017. "Global and local scale characteristics in convex and nonconvex nonparametric technologies: A first empirical exploration," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(2), pages 576-586.
    6. Subhash C. Ray, 2014. "Data Envelopment Analysis: An Overview," Working papers 2014-33, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics.
    7. Mostafa Omidi & Mohsen Rostamy-Malkhalifeh & Ali Payan & Farhad Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, 2019. "Estimation of Overall Returns to Scale (RTS) of a Frontier Unit Using the Left and Right RTS," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 53(2), pages 633-655, February.
    8. Kristof Witte & Rui Marques, 2011. "Big and beautiful? On non-parametrically measuring scale economies in non-convex technologies," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 213-226, June.
    9. Alirezaee, Mohammadreza & Hajinezhad, Ensie & Paradi, Joseph C., 2018. "Objective identification of technological returns to scale for data envelopment analysis models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(2), pages 678-688.
    10. M. Zarepisheh & E. Khorram & G. Jahanshahloo, 2010. "Returns to scale in multiplicative models in data envelopment analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 173(1), pages 195-206, January.
    11. Hadjicostas, Petros & Soteriou, Andreas C., 2006. "One-sided elasticities and technical efficiency in multi-output production: A theoretical framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 168(2), pages 425-449, January.
    12. A. Davoodi & M. Zarepisheh & H. Rezai, 2015. "The nearest MPSS pattern in data envelopment analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 226(1), pages 163-176, March.
    13. M Soleimani-damaneh, 2009. "A fast algorithm for determining some characteristics in DEA," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(11), pages 1528-1534, November.
    14. Torben Schubert & Guoliang Yang, 2016. "Institutional change and the optimal size of universities," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 108(3), pages 1129-1153, September.
    15. Zarepisheh, M. & Soleimani-damaneh, M., 2008. "Global variation of outputs with respect to the variation of inputs in performance analysis; generalized RTS," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(2), pages 786-800, April.
    16. Dellnitz, Andreas & Tavana, Madjid, 2024. "Data envelopment analysis: From non-monotonic to monotonic scale elasticities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 318(2), pages 549-559.
    17. Kaoru Tone, 2001. "On Returns to Scale under Weight Restrictions in Data Envelopment Analysis," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 31-47, July.
    18. Anna Ćwiąkała-Małys & Violetta Nowak, 2009. "Classification of Data Envelopment Analysis models," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 19(3), pages 5-18.
    19. Mark Andor & Frederik Hesse, 2014. "The StoNED age: the departure into a new era of efficiency analysis? A monte carlo comparison of StoNED and the “oldies” (SFA and DEA)," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 85-109, February.
    20. Thanassoulis, Emmanuel, 2000. "DEA and its use in the regulation of water companies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(1), pages 1-13, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecmode:v:33:y:2013:i:c:p:182-186. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30411 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.