[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/aumajo/v21y2013i1p25-29.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors moderating the impact of word of mouth for TV and film broadcasts

Author

Listed:
  • Nguyen, Cathy
  • Romaniuk, Jenni
Abstract
This study builds on the research of East et al. (2008) into the relative impact of Positive and Negative Word of Mouth (PWOM, NWOM). It examines two low involvement categories with different consumer transaction patterns: TV programs and films. The results reveal that when prior viewing probabilities have equivalent room-to-change, PWOM and NWOM have the same level of impact for films, but PWOM is more influential than NWOM for TV programs. This is an important boundary condition for the work of East et al. (2008) and suggests that the value of NWOM should be discounted in TV programs, irrespective of the prior propensity to view. Consistent with East et al. (2008), we find that PWOM is more influential on those with lower viewing probabilities. Our findings provide guidance as to which type of viewers should be targeted with WOM campaigns to have the greatest effect on audience growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Nguyen, Cathy & Romaniuk, Jenni, 2013. "Factors moderating the impact of word of mouth for TV and film broadcasts," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 25-29.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:aumajo:v:21:y:2013:i:1:p:25-29
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ausmj.2012.08.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1441358212000511
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ausmj.2012.08.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Uncles, Mark D. & East, Robert & Lomax, Wendy, 2010. "Market share is correlated with word-of-mouth volume," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 145-150.
    2. Jonah Berger & Alan T. Sorensen & Scott J. Rasmussen, 2010. "Positive Effects of Negative Publicity: When Negative Reviews Increase Sales," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(5), pages 815-827, 09-10.
    3. Ahluwalia, Rohini, 2002. "How Prevalent Is the Negativity Effect in Consumer Environments?," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 29(2), pages 270-279, September.
    4. East, Robert & Hammond, Kathy & Lomax, Wendy, 2008. "Measuring the impact of positive and negative word of mouth on brand purchase probability," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 215-224.
    5. Herr, Paul M & Kardes, Frank R & Kim, John, 1991. "Effects of Word-of-Mouth and Product-Attribute Information on Persuasion: An Accessibility-Diagnosticity Perspective," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 17(4), pages 454-462, March.
    6. F. Thomas Juster, 1966. "Consumer Buying Intentions and Purchase Probability: An Experiment in Survey Design," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number just66-2.
    7. David Godes & Dina Mayzlin, 2004. "Using Online Conversations to Study Word-of-Mouth Communication," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 545-560, June.
    8. Dina Mayzlin, 2006. "Promotional Chat on the Internet," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 155-163, 03-04.
    9. Xueming Luo, 2009. "Quantifying the Long-Term Impact of Negative Word of Mouth on Cash Flows and Stock Prices," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 148-165, 01-02.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nguyen, Cathy & Romaniuk, Jenni, 2014. "Pass it on: A framework for classifying the content of word of mouth," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 117-124.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Agnieszka Zablocki & Bodo Schlegelmilch & Michael J. Houston, 2019. "How valence, volume and variance of online reviews influence brand attitudes," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 9(1), pages 61-77, June.
    2. Andrew E. Wilson & Michael D. Giebelhausen & Michael K. Brady, 2017. "Negative word of mouth can be a positive for consumers connected to the brand," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 534-547, July.
    3. Koji Ishida & Lisa Slevitch & Katia Siamionava, 2016. "The Effects of Traditional and Electronic Word-of-Mouth on Destination Image: A Case of Vacation Tourists Visiting Branson, Missouri," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-17, September.
    4. Kim, Jikyung (Jeanne) & Dong, Hang & Choi, Jeonghye & Chang, Sue Ryung, 2022. "Sentiment change and negative herding: Evidence from microblogging and news," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 364-376.
    5. Bambauer-Sachse, Silke & Mangold, Sabrina, 2011. "Brand equity dilution through negative online word-of-mouth communication," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 38-45.
    6. Garrett P. Sonnier & Leigh McAlister & Oliver J. Rutz, 2011. "A Dynamic Model of the Effect of Online Communications on Firm Sales," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 702-716, July.
    7. Kick, Markus, 2015. "Social Media Research: A Narrative Review," EconStor Preprints 182506, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    8. Nejad, Mohammad G. & Amini, Mehdi & Sherrell, Daniel L., 2016. "The profit impact of revenue heterogeneity and assortativity in the presence of negative word-of-mouth," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 656-673.
    9. Sofie Bitter & Sonja Grabner-Kräuter, 2016. "Consequences of customer engagement behavior: when negative Facebook posts have positive effects," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 26(3), pages 219-231, August.
    10. Reo Song & Ho Kim & Gene Moo Lee & Sungha Jang, 2019. "Does Deceptive Marketing Pay? The Evolution of Consumer Sentiment Surrounding a Pseudo-Product-Harm Crisis," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(3), pages 743-761, September.
    11. Jung Ah Han & Elea McDonnell Feit & Shuba Srinivasan, 2020. "Can negative buzz increase awareness and purchase intent?," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 89-104, March.
    12. Moldovan, Sarit & Goldenberg, Jacob & Chattopadhyay, Amitava, 2011. "The different roles of product originality and usefulness in generating word-of-mouth," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 109-119.
    13. Bambauer-Sachse, Silke & Mangold, Sabrina, 2013. "Do consumers still believe what is said in online product reviews? A persuasion knowledge approach," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 373-381.
    14. Sebastian Schneider, 2022. "Price-related consumer discussions in China and the United States: a cross-cultural study investigating price perceptions and word-of-mouth transmission," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(3), pages 274-290, June.
    15. Chakravarty, Anindita & Liu, Yong & Mazumdar, Tridib, 2010. "The Differential Effects of Online Word-of-Mouth and Critics' Reviews on Pre-release Movie Evaluation," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 185-197.
    16. Pan, Lee-Yun & Chiou, Jyh-Shen, 2011. "How Much Can You Trust Online Information? Cues for Perceived Trustworthiness of Consumer-generated Online Information," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 67-74.
    17. Williams, Martin & Buttle, Francis, 2011. "The Eight Pillars of WOM management: Lessons from a multiple case study," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 85-92.
    18. Tata, Sai Vijay & Prashar, Sanjeev & Gupta, Sumeet, 2020. "An examination of the role of review valence and review source in varying consumption contexts on purchase decision," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    19. Sebastian Schneider & Frank Huber, 2022. "You paid what!? Understanding price-related word-of-mouth and price perception among opinion leaders and innovators," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(1), pages 64-80, February.
    20. Ashutosh Tiwari & Timothy J. Richards, 2016. "Social Networks and Restaurant Ratings," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(2), pages 153-174, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:aumajo:v:21:y:2013:i:1:p:25-29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/australasian-marketing-journal/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.