[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/edr/sswrgl/v1y2017i1p35-41.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Partnership And Trust Building

Author

Listed:
  • Eugenia Udangiu

    (University of Craiova, Romania)

Abstract
A normal functioning of the society involves mechanisms for conflicts regulation and institutions that favor the emergence of cooperative structures. "Partnership" is one of these structures. The term refers to relationships and agreements between individuals, firms and communities, from local to global scale. It is an instrument for solving issues of collective interest such as economic development, social cohesion, employment and risk sharing. Trust may be the result of a long term successful cooperation and risks sharing. In the former, pre-industrial societies, trust was generated in small groups by face-to-face interactions and spread from bottom-up. Then, the shared social virtues like honesty, reciprocity and the respect to commitments became the base of social capital and of intra- and intergroup cooperation. But in the last twenty years, a large number of researches found a deficit of trust in our societies, empirically translated by the breakup of families, the decreasing number of spontaneous associations and increased violence, crime and costs of cooperation. Trust diminishes our-days and this happens while the number of contacts and partnership agreements increase. Is it a paradox? In our complex and fluid world characterized more and more by risks and uncertainties trust could be rebuilt from up to bottom: from the stable states to a mobile society.

Suggested Citation

  • Eugenia Udangiu, 2017. "Partnership And Trust Building," Sociology and Social Work Review, International Society for projects in Education and Research, vol. 1(1), pages 35-41, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:edr:sswrgl:v:1:y:2017:i:1:p:35-41
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://globalresearchpublishing.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Partnership-and-trust-building.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kinne, Brandon J, 2013. "Network Dynamics and the Evolution of International Cooperation," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 107(4), pages 766-785, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniela Grignoli & Ionuț Șerban, 2018. "Propulsive Welfare For The “Risk Societies”: A Project For Solidarity And Communication In The Social-Health System," Sociology and Social Work Review, International Society for projects in Education and Research, vol. 2(2), pages 6-16, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carattini, Stefano & Fankhauser, Sam & Gao, Jianjian & Gennaioli, Caterina & Panzarasa, Pietro, 2023. "What does network analysis teach us about international environmental cooperation?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    2. Renato Corbetta, 2015. "Between indifference and coercion: Third-party intervention techniques in ongoing disputes," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 32(1), pages 3-27, February.
    3. Lovrić, Marko & Lovrić, Nataša & Schraml, Ulrich, 2019. "Modeling policy networks: The case of Natura 2000 in Croatian forestry," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 90-102.
    4. Simone Arnaldi & Alessandro Lombardo & Angela Tessarolo, 2021. "A preliminary study of science diplomacy networks in Central, Eastern and South-Eastern Europe," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-9, December.
    5. James Hollway & Jean-Frédéric Morin & Joost Pauwelyn, 2020. "Structural conditions for novelty: the introduction of new environmental clauses to the trade regime complex," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 61-83, March.
    6. Jewell, Jessica & Vetier, Marta & Garcia-Cabrera, Daniel, 2019. "The international technological nuclear cooperation landscape: A new dataset and network analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 838-852.
    7. Kong, NGUYEN To Hong, 2021. "State-to-state Trust in Post-leadership Change: Case Study of China-Japan Relations, 2009-2019," OSF Preprints hdbcy, Center for Open Science.
    8. Christina L. Davis & Tyler Pratt, 2021. "The forces of attraction: How security interests shape membership in economic institutions," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 903-929, October.
    9. Machiel van der Heijden, 2021. "Agencies without borders: Explaining partner selection in the formation of transnational agreements between regulators," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(3), pages 725-744, July.
    10. Yi Yi Mon & Seunghoo Lim & Makoto Kakinaka, 2019. "Multiplex Relations between States: Coevolution of Trade Agreements and Political Alliances," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-24, July.
    11. Linqing Liu & Weiran Wang & Xiaofei Yan & Mengyun Shen & Haizhi Chen, 2023. "The cascade influence of grain trade shocks on countries in the context of the Russia-Ukraine conflict," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-28, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    trust; mobility; network analysis; externalities.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • P40 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Other Economic Systems - - - General
    • P49 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Other Economic Systems - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:edr:sswrgl:v:1:y:2017:i:1:p:35-41. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Serban Ionut (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ispedur.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.