[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jexpos/v8y2021i3p247-259_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tribalism in America: Behavioral Experiments on Affective Polarization in the Trump Era

Author

Listed:
  • Whitt, Sam
  • Yanus, Alixandra B.
  • McDonald, Brian
  • Graeber, John
  • Setzler, Mark
  • Ballingrud, Gordon
  • Kifer, Martin
Abstract
Our research speaks to the ongoing debate over the extent and severity of partisan political divisions in American society. We employ behavioral experiments to probe for affective polarization using dictator, trust, and public goods games with party identification treatments. We find that subjects who identify politically with the Democratic or Republican Party and ideologically as liberals and conservatives display stronger affective biases than politically unaffiliated and ideological moderates. Partisan subjects are less altruistic, less trusting, and less likely to contribute to a mutually beneficial public good when paired with members of the opposing party. Compared to other behavioral studies, our research suggests increasing levels of affective polarization in the way Americans relate to one another politically, bordering on the entrenched divisions one commonly sees in conflict or post-conflict societies. To overcome affective polarization, our research points to inter-group contact as a mechanism for increasing trust and bridging political divides.

Suggested Citation

  • Whitt, Sam & Yanus, Alixandra B. & McDonald, Brian & Graeber, John & Setzler, Mark & Ballingrud, Gordon & Kifer, Martin, 2021. "Tribalism in America: Behavioral Experiments on Affective Polarization in the Trump Era," Journal of Experimental Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(3), pages 247-259, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jexpos:v:8:y:2021:i:3:p:247-259_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2052263020000299/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gloria Danqiao Cheng & Serena Does & Margaret Shih, 2024. "Partisan differences in perceived levels of democracy across presidential administrations," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jexpos:v:8:y:2021:i:3:p:247-259_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/xps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.