[go: up one dir, main page]

IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/etheor/v28y2012i01p239-246_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Another Numerical Method Of Finding Critical Values For The Andrews Stability Test

Author

Listed:
  • Anatolyev, Stanislav
  • Kosenok, Grigory
Abstract
We propose a method, alternative to that of Estrella (2003, Econometric Theory 19, 1128–1143), of obtaining exact asymptotic p-values and critical values for the popular Andrews (1993, Econometrica 61, 821–856) test for structural stability. The method is based on inverting an integral equation that determines the intensity of crossing a boundary by the asymptotic process underlying the test statistic. Further integration of the crossing intensity yields a p-value. The proposed method can potentially be applied to other stability tests that employ the supremum functional.

Suggested Citation

  • Anatolyev, Stanislav & Kosenok, Grigory, 2012. "Another Numerical Method Of Finding Critical Values For The Andrews Stability Test," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 28(1), pages 239-246, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:etheor:v:28:y:2012:i:01:p:239-246_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0266466611000314/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Castro, Carlos & Ferrari, Stijn, 2014. "Measuring and testing for the systemically important financial institutions," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 1-14.
    2. Anatolyev Stanislav & Kosenok Grigory, 2018. "Sequential Testing with Uniformly Distributed Size," Journal of Time Series Econometrics, De Gruyter, vol. 10(2), pages 1-22, July.
    3. Christis Katsouris, 2023. "Predictability Tests Robust against Parameter Instability," Papers 2307.15151, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:etheor:v:28:y:2012:i:01:p:239-246_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ect .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.