[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/meanco/v4y2016i4p86-96.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hazy Boundaries: Virtual Communities and Research Ethics

Author

Listed:
  • Helena Kantanen

    (Business School, University of Eastern Finland, Finland)

  • Jyri Manninen

    (School of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of Eastern Finland, Finland)

Abstract
This paper examines ethical issues specific to research into virtual communities. Drawing on an empirical case with online forums of education experts, we identify the following key issues: publicity versus privacy of the community; the definition of human subjects research; participant recruitment; informed consent; and ethical questions associated with observing virtual communities, and with reporting and disseminating research results. We maintain that different research cultures in different countries can present challenges when studying global forums. Acknowledging the ephemeral characteristics of Internet contexts, this paper argues that ethical considerations should be more case-based, instead of relying on one model for all solutions. We suggest that local ethics committees or institutional review boards could, with their expert knowledge of ethics, provide valuable support for researchers operating in the complex and dynamic terrain of Internet research, as well as in fields and research settings where an ethical review is not a standard part of the research process.

Suggested Citation

  • Helena Kantanen & Jyri Manninen, 2016. "Hazy Boundaries: Virtual Communities and Research Ethics," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(4), pages 86-96.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v4:y:2016:i:4:p:86-96
    DOI: 10.17645/mac.v4i4.576
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/576
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/mac.v4i4.576?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v4:y:2016:i:4:p:86-96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.