[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cbu/jrnlec/y2016v1p175-182.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

CASH-FLOW vs. MARKET-VALUE CDOs

Author

Listed:
  • SILVIU EDUARD DINCA

    (UNIVERSITY OF CRAIOVA)

Abstract
During the past few years, in the recent post-crisis aftermath, global asset managers are constantly searching new ways to optimize their investment portfolios while financial and banking institutions around the world are exploring new alternatives to better secure their financing and refinancing demands altogether with the enhancement of their risk management capabilities. We will exhibit herewith a comparison between the cash-flow and market-value CDO securitizations as financial markets-based funding, investment and risks mitigation techniques, highlighting certain key structuring and implementation specifics on each of them.

Suggested Citation

  • Silviu Eduard Dinca, 2016. "CASH-FLOW vs. MARKET-VALUE CDOs," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1, pages 175-182, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2016:v:1:p:175-182
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.utgjiu.ro/revista/ec/pdf/2016-01/24_Dinca%202.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Silviu Eduard Dinca, 2015. "CASH vs. SYNTHETIC CDOs," Studies and Scientific Researches. Economics Edition, "Vasile Alecsandri" University of Bacau, Faculty of Economic Sciences, issue 22.
    2. Silviu Eduard Dinca, 2015. "Structured Finance & Assets Securitisation: Participants’ Motivations And Competitive Advantages," Annals of University of Craiova - Economic Sciences Series, University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 2(43), pages 239-254.
    3. Silviu Eduard Dinca, 2016. "BALANCE-SHEET vs. ARBITRAGE CDOs," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1, pages 110-119, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Silviu Eduard Dinca, 2016. "BALANCE-SHEET vs. ARBITRAGE CDOs," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1, pages 110-119, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Silviu Eduard Dinca, 2016. "BALANCE-SHEET vs. ARBITRAGE CDOs," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1, pages 110-119, February.
    2. Silviu Eduard Dinca, 2015. "CASH vs. SYNTHETIC CDOs," Studies and Scientific Researches. Economics Edition, "Vasile Alecsandri" University of Bacau, Faculty of Economic Sciences, issue 22.
    3. Silviu Eduard Dinca, 2015. "CASH vs. SYNTHETIC ASSET-BACKED COMMERCIAL PAPERS," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 6, pages 104-112, December.
    4. Silviu Eduard Dinca, 2015. "CASH vs. SYNTHETIC ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 6, pages 168-174, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2016:v:1:p:175-182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ecobici Nicolae (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fetgjro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.