[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v99y2018i3p1119-1133.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Long Road to Equality: A Meta‐Regression Analysis of Changes in the Black Test Score Gap Over Time

Author

Listed:
  • Nick Huntington‐Klein
  • Elizabeth Ackert
Abstract
Objective We analyze changes in test score gaps between black students and their peers from 1979 to 2010 and examine how observable factors contribute to the gap. Methods Using meta‐regression, we examine the relationship between African‐American racial status and achievement in U.S. K–12 education in 165 published studies. Results The absolute relationship between black status and achievement decreased during the 1980s and early 1990s, but was stagnant from the late 1990s through 2010. Socioeconomic status explained more than half of the gap, and the influence of socioeconomic status on the gap did not change significantly over time. Schooling characteristics explained relatively little of the gap, but school‐level factors increased in importance over time. Conclusion Black test score gap closure stagnated in an era when federal education policy sought to close racial achievement gaps. Observable factors explain more of the gap than has been previously recognized.

Suggested Citation

  • Nick Huntington‐Klein & Elizabeth Ackert, 2018. "The Long Road to Equality: A Meta‐Regression Analysis of Changes in the Black Test Score Gap Over Time," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 99(3), pages 1119-1133, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:99:y:2018:i:3:p:1119-1133
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12483
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12483
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.12483?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:99:y:2018:i:3:p:1119-1133. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.