[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssa/v162y1999i3p303-328.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why use arbitrary points scores?: ordered categories in models of educational progress

Author

Listed:
  • A. Fielding
Abstract
Much statistical modelling of random effects on ordered responses, particularly of grades in educational research, continues to use linear models and to treat the responses through arbitrary scores. Methodological and software developments now facilitate the proper treatment of such situations through more realistic generalized random‐effects models. This paper reviews some methodological comparisons of these approaches. It highlights the flexibility offered by the macro facilities of the multilevel random‐effects software MLwiN. It considers applications to an analysis of primary school educational progress from reception to England and Wales national curriculum key stage 1 mathematics. By contrasting the results from generalized modelling and scoring approaches it draws some conclusions about the theoretical, methodological and practical options that are available. It also considers that results of generalized random‐model estimation may be more intelligible to users of analytical results.

Suggested Citation

  • A. Fielding, 1999. "Why use arbitrary points scores?: ordered categories in models of educational progress," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 162(3), pages 303-328.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssa:v:162:y:1999:i:3:p:303-328
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-985X.00137
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-985X.00137
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-985X.00137?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kersting, Erasmus & Kilby, Christopher, 2014. "Aid and democracy redux," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 125-143.
    2. Jacobo Rozo Alzate, 2017. "La educación secundaria y sus dos dimensiones. Efectos del barrio y del colegio sobre los resultados saber 11," Revista de Economía del Rosario, Universidad del Rosario, vol. 20(1), pages 33-69, June.
    3. Brown, Sarah & Taylor, Karl & Wheatley Price, Stephen, 2005. "Debt and distress: Evaluating the psychological cost of credit," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 26(5), pages 642-663, October.
    4. Salule Joseph Masangwi & Anthony Martin Grimason & Tracy Dawn Morse & Lawrence Kazembe & Neil Ferguson & George Christopher Jabu, 2012. "Pattern of Maternal Knowledge and Its Implications for Diarrhoea Control in Southern Malawi: Multilevel Thresholds of Change Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-15, March.
    5. Michael A. Shields & Stephen Wheatley Price, 2005. "Exploring the economic and social determinants of psychological well‐being and perceived social support in England," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 168(3), pages 513-537, July.
    6. Corrado, L. & Fingleton, B., 2011. "Multilevel Modelling with Spatial Effects," SIRE Discussion Papers 2011-13, Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE).
    7. Rutherford, Gillian N. & Bebi, Peter & Edwards, Peter J. & Zimmermann, Niklaus E., 2008. "Assessing land-use statistics to model land cover change in a mountainous landscape in the European Alps," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 212(3), pages 460-471.
    8. Antony Fielding, 2004. "Scaling for Residual Variance Components of Ordered Category Responses in Generalised Linear Mixed Multilevel Models," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 38(4), pages 425-433, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssa:v:162:y:1999:i:3:p:303-328. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.