[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/canjag/v55y2007i4p485-498.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic Programming and Learning Models for Management of a Nonnative Species

Author

Listed:
  • Mark E. Eiswerth
  • G. Cornelis Van Kooten
Abstract
Nonnative invasive species result in sizeable economic damages and control costs. Because dynamic optimization models break down if controls depend in complex ways on past controls, nonuniform or scale‐dependent spatial attributes, etc., decision‐support systems that allow learning may be preferred. We compare two models of an invasive weed in California's grazing lands: (i) a stochastic dynamic programming model and (ii) a reinforcement‐based, experience‐weighted attraction (EWA) learning model. We extend the EWA approach by including stochastic forage growth and penalties for repeated application of environmentally harmful controls. Results indicate that EWA learning models offer some promise for managing invasive species. Les espèces non indigènes envahissantes entraînent des dommages économiques et des coûts de lutte considérables. Compte tenu que les modèles d'optimisation dynamique échouent lorsque les moyens de lutte dépendent, de façon complexe, de moyens de lutte antérieurs, d'attributs spatiaux influencés par l'échelle ou non uniformes, etc., l'utilisation de systèmes d'aide à la décision permettant l'apprentissage pourrait être préférable. Nous avons comparé deux modèles dans le cas d'une plante adventice envahissant les pâturages de la Californie: 1. un modèle de programmation dynamique stochastique; 2. un modèle d'apprentissage experience‐weighted attraction (EWA), fondé sur le renforcement. Nous avons élargi le modèle EWA en y incluant la croissance stochastique des fourrages et des pénalités imposées pour l'utilisation répétée de moyens de lutte dommageables pour l'environnement. Selon les résultats obtenus, les modèles d'apprentissage EWA semblent prometteurs pour la gestion des espèces envahissantes.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark E. Eiswerth & G. Cornelis Van Kooten, 2007. "Dynamic Programming and Learning Models for Management of a Nonnative Species," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 55(4), pages 485-498, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:canjag:v:55:y:2007:i:4:p:485-498
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7976.2007.00104.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7976.2007.00104.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1744-7976.2007.00104.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark E. Eiswerth & G. Cornelis van Kooten, 2002. "Uncertainty, Economics, and the Spread of an Invasive Plant Species," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 84(5), pages 1317-1322.
    2. Oscar R. Burt & John R. Allison, 1963. "Farm Management Decisions With Dynamic Programming," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 45(1), pages 121-136.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eiswerth, Mark E. & Yen, Steven T. & van Kooten, G. Cornelis, 2011. "Factors determining awareness and knowledge of aquatic invasive species," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(9), pages 1672-1679, July.
    2. Kimberly Burnett & Sittidaj Pongkijvorasin & James Roumasset, 2012. "Species Invasion as Catastrophe: The Case of the Brown Tree Snake," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 51(2), pages 241-254, February.
    3. Carrasco, L.R. & Mumford, J.D. & MacLeod, A. & Knight, J.D. & Baker, R.H.A., 2010. "Comprehensive bioeconomic modelling of multiple harmful non-indigenous species," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(6), pages 1303-1312, April.
    4. James Nolan & Dawn Parker & G. Cornelis Van Kooten & Thomas Berger, 2009. "An Overview of Computational Modeling in Agricultural and Resource Economics," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 57(4), pages 417-429, December.
    5. Morteza Chalak & David J. Pannell, 2015. "Optimal Integrated Strategies to Control an Invasive Weed," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 63(3), pages 381-407, September.
    6. Haider, Zulqarnain & Charkhgard, Hadi & Kwon, Changhyun, 2018. "A robust optimization approach for solving problems in conservation planning," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 368(C), pages 288-297.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thang, Tran Cong & Burton, Michael P. & Brennan, Donna C., 2009. "Optimal replanting and cutting rule for coffee farmers in Vietnam," 2009 Conference (53rd), February 11-13, 2009, Cairns, Australia 47638, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    2. Ranjan, Ram & Evans, Edward A., 2007. "Private Responses to Public Incentives for Invasive Species Management," Farm and Business - The Journal of the Caribbean Agro-Economic Society, Caribbean Agro-Economic Society, vol. 7(1), pages 1-24.
    3. Ranjan, Ram, 2005. "Environmental Restoration of Invaded Ecosystems: How Much Versus How Often?," Working Papers 15661, University of Florida, International Agricultural Trade and Policy Center.
    4. Matta, Jagannadha R. & Alavalapati, Janaki R.R. & Stainback, George A., 2009. "Effect of conserving habitat for biodiversity on optimal management of non-industrial private forests in Florida," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 223-235, December.
    5. Batabyal, Amitrajeet A. & Beladi, Hamid, 2006. "International trade and biological invasions: A queuing theoretic analysis of the prevention problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(3), pages 758-770, May.
    6. Howitt, Richard E. & Reynaud, Arnaud & Msangi, Siwa & Knapp, Keith C., 2002. "Calibrated Stochastic Dynamic Models for Resource Management," 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA 19620, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    7. Lee, Donna J. & Adams, Damian C. & Kim, C.S., 2009. "Managing invasive plants on public conservation forestlands: Application of a bio-economic model," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 237-243, July.
    8. Kim Meyer Hall & Heidi J. Albers & Majid Alkaee Taleghan & Thomas G. Dietterich, 2018. "Optimal Spatial-Dynamic Management of Stochastic Species Invasions," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 70(2), pages 403-427, June.
    9. Kobayashi, Mimako & Harris, Thomas R. & Rollins, Kimberly S., 2009. "Invasive Weeds, Wildfire, and Rancher Decision Making in the Great Basin," 2009 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, 2009, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 49365, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    10. Finnoff, David & Potapov, Alexei & Lewis, Mark A., 2010. "Control and the management of a spreading invader," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 534-550, November.
    11. Alison Eagle & Mark Eiswerth & Wayne Johnson & Steve Schoenig & G. Cornelis van Kooten, 2006. "Economic Impacts of Yellow Starthistle on California Ranchers," Working Papers 2006-01, University of Victoria, Department of Economics, Resource Economics and Policy Analysis Research Group.
    12. Amit Batabyal & Peter Nijkamp, 2005. "On Container Versus Time Based Inspection Policies in Invasive Species Management," ERSA conference papers ersa05p162, European Regional Science Association.
    13. Lee, Donna J. & Motoki, Michael & Vanderwoude, Casper & Nakamoto, Stuart T. & Leung, PingSun, 2015. "Taking the sting out of Little Fire Ant in Hawaii," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 100-110.
    14. Moffitt, L. Joe & Osteen, Craig D., 2006. "Prioritizing Invasive Species Threats Under Uncertainty," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 35(1), pages 1-11, April.
    15. L. Joe Moffitt & John K. Stranlund & Craig D. Osteen, 2009. "Securing the Border from Invasives: Robust Inspections Under Severe Uncertainty," Working Papers 2009-6, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Department of Resource Economics.
    16. Janmaat, J. & vanKooten, G.C., 1992. "An Analysis of the Canadian Gross Revenue Insurance Plan for Southern Saskatchewan," WAEA/ WFEA Conference Archive (1929-1995) 321404, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    17. Min, He & Gopinath, Munisamy & Buccola, Steven T. & McEvoy, Peter B., 2006. "Rent-Seeking in Noxious Weed Regulations: Evidence from US States," 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA 21212, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    18. James Nolan & Dawn Parker & G. Cornelis Van Kooten & Thomas Berger, 2009. "An Overview of Computational Modeling in Agricultural and Resource Economics," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 57(4), pages 417-429, December.
    19. Štefan Bojnec & Imre Fertő, 2008. "European Enlargement and Agro‐Food Trade," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 56(4), pages 563-579, December.
    20. Olson, Kent D., 1998. "Precision Agriculture: Current Economic And Environmental Issues," Conference Papers 14487, University of Minnesota, Center for International Food and Agricultural Policy.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C73 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Stochastic and Dynamic Games; Evolutionary Games
    • Q57 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Ecological Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:canjag:v:55:y:2007:i:4:p:485-498. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/caefmea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.