[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/corgov/v8y2000i2p166-176.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corporate Governance under ‘New Public Management’: an exemplification

Author

Listed:
  • Mark Clatworthy
  • Howard Mellett
  • Michael Peel
Abstract
A key feature of the ‘New Public Management’ reforms has been the adoption, by public sector bodies, of modes of organisation and governance more usually associated with the private sector. This paper seeks to identify the general model of corporate governance prevailing in the private sector and reviews the extent to which its elements are paralleled in the public sector. It uses NHS trusts as exemplars to examine whether sufficient congruity exists between them to allow governance models created in the private sector to be applied to the public sector. If such a transfer is not appropriate, trusts would require tailor made governance models. It would also highlight the extent to which private sector techniques can be transferred to the public sector without modification. The conclusion is that the study of corporate governance in NHS trusts shows that the transplant of private sector culture, as reflected in modes of corporate governance, is not complete, necessary or possible.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Clatworthy & Howard Mellett & Michael Peel, 2000. "Corporate Governance under ‘New Public Management’: an exemplification," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(2), pages 166-176, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:corgov:v:8:y:2000:i:2:p:166-176
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-8683.00193
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00193
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-8683.00193?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Niamh M. Brennan & Jill Solomon, 2008. "Corporate governance, accountability and mechanisms of accountability: an overview," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(7), pages 885-906, September.
    2. Adelina DUMITRESCU, 2014. "The Role and Importance of Governance for the Public Sector. Case Study for Romania," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(4), pages 505-513, October.
    3. Howard Mellett & Neil Marriott & Louise Macniven, 2009. "Diffusion of an Accounting Innovation: Fixed Asset Accounting in the NHS in Wales," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(4), pages 745-764.
    4. Andrea Calabrò & Mariateresa Torchia & Francesco Ranalli, 2013. "Ownership and control in local public utilities: the Italian case," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 17(4), pages 835-862, November.
    5. Yapa, P.W. Senarath, 2014. "In whose interest? An examination of public sector governance in Brunei Darussalam," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 25(8), pages 803-818.
    6. Sheila Ellwood & Javier Garcia-Lacalle, 2015. "The Influence of Presence and Position of Women on the Boards of Directors: The Case of NHS Foundation Trusts," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 130(1), pages 69-84, August.
    7. Lee, Bill, 2010. "The individual learning account experiment in the UK: A conjunctural crisis?," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 18-30.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:corgov:v:8:y:2000:i:2:p:166-176. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0964-8410&site=1 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.