[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aea/aejmic/v12y2020i1p220-59.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Credibility of Crime Allegations

Author

Listed:
  • Frances Xu Lee
  • Wing Suen
Abstract
The lack of hard evidence in allegations about sexual misconduct makes it difficult to separate true allegations from false ones. We provide a model in which victims and potential libelers face the same costs and benefits from making an allegation, but the tendency for perpetrators of sexual misconduct to engage in repeat offenses allows semiseparation to occur, which lends credibility to such allegations. Our model also explains why reports about sexual misconduct are often delayed, and why the public rationally assigns less credibility to these delayed reports.

Suggested Citation

  • Frances Xu Lee & Wing Suen, 2020. "Credibility of Crime Allegations," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 12(1), pages 220-259, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:aea:aejmic:v:12:y:2020:i:1:p:220-59
    DOI: 10.1257/mic.20180231
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/mic.20180231
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/mic.20180231.ds
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1257/mic.20180231?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Colagrossi, Marco & Deiana, Claudio & Dragone, Davide & Geraci, Andrea & Giua, Ludovica & Iori, Elisa, 2023. "Intimate partner violence and help-seeking: The role of femicide news," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    2. Ratul Das Chaudhury & Birendra Rai & Liang Choon Wang & Dyuti Banerjee, 2021. "Welfare v. Consent: On the Optimal Penalty for Harassment," Papers 2103.00734, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2023.
    3. Harry Pei & Bruno Strulovici, 2020. "Crime Aggregation, Deterrence, and Witness Credibility," Papers 2009.06470, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • D82 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Asymmetric and Private Information; Mechanism Design
    • J16 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
    • K14 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Criminal Law
    • K42 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - Illegal Behavior and the Enforcement of Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aea:aejmic:v:12:y:2020:i:1:p:220-59. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Michael P. Albert (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.