Author
Abstract Most research on false information is currently beeing conducted in the realm of politics and Covid-19. This study addresses environmentally-related news stories. With the help of two experiments, I explore determi-nants that can explain who is good at distinguishing between accurate (i.e., factually correct) and false information, and compare several intervention sce-narios to debunk false information. In experiment one, subjects had to rate environmentally-related news stories as accurate or false. Afterward, subjects re-ceived systematically varied information about the correctness of the news stories depending on the ex-perimental condition they had been randomly as-signed to. After a period of three weeks, the subjects were asked to evaluate the news stories again (exper-iment two). In experiment one, I find that the per-ceived familiarity with news stories increased the propensity to accept them as true. Moreover, actively open-minded thinking helped to distinguish between accurate and false information. But the willingness to think deliberately did not seem to be important. In experiment two, it can be found that by repeating false news stories, subjects were more likely to adequately identify them later (i.e., no evidence for a familiarity backfire effect). However, it decreased the likelihood to adequately identify accurate news stories. A some-what reverse, but weaker effect occurred when factu-ally correct news stories were repeated: the correct identification of accurate news stories was more suc-cessful, but the opposite holds for the identification of false news stories.
Suggested Citation
Grüner, Sven, 2021.
"Identifying and Debunking Environmentally-Related False News Stories – An Experimental Investigation,"
German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 70(04), January.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:gjagec:343303
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.343303
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:gjagec:343303. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iahubde.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.