[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/jeapmx/v21y2019i02ns146433321950008x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Distilling and Applying Criteria for Best Practice EIA Follow-Up

Author

Listed:
  • Elise Pinto

    (Environmental and Conservation Sciences, Murdoch University, Perth, Australia)

  • Angus Morrison-Saunders

    (Environmental and Conservation Sciences, Murdoch University, Perth, Australia†Centre for Ecosystem Management, School of Science, Edith Cowan University, Australia‡Research Unit for Environmental Science and Management, North West University, South Africa)

  • Alan Bond

    (#x2021;Research Unit for Environmental Science and Management, North West University, South Africa§School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, Norfolk NR4 7TJ, United Kingdom)

  • Jenny Pope

    (#x2020;Centre for Ecosystem Management, School of Science, Edith Cowan University, Australia¶Integral Sustainability, PO Box 79, South Fremantle, WA 6162, Australia)

  • Francois Retief

    (#x2021;Research Unit for Environmental Science and Management, North West University, South Africa)

Abstract
Follow-up is an essential component of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) if the success of EIA in improving the sustainability of a project once implemented is to be determined. This paper aims to establish universally-applicable criteria for EIA follow-up to evaluate project performance once assessed and underway. A suite of 24 criteria is derived from EIA follow-up best practice principles published by the International Association for Impact Assessment. The criteria are categorized according to the five dimensions of EIA follow-up: monitoring, evaluation, management, communication and governance. Posed as questions, the criteria support qualitative assessments of EIA follow-up performance for a project. Through application of the criteria to a case study currently under construction (the Shell Cove Marina project in eastern Australia), we found they provided an effective basis for a document review process delivering a short but informative account of the follow-up performance of the case study. The more robust evaluation of some of the criteria, particularly in the governance category, would require supplementary techniques such as interviews.

Suggested Citation

  • Elise Pinto & Angus Morrison-Saunders & Alan Bond & Jenny Pope & Francois Retief, 2019. "Distilling and Applying Criteria for Best Practice EIA Follow-Up," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(02), pages 1-32, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:wsi:jeapmx:v:21:y:2019:i:02:n:s146433321950008x
    DOI: 10.1142/S146433321950008X
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S146433321950008X
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S146433321950008X?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huang, Shi-Zheng, 2022. "Do green financing and industrial structure matter for green economic recovery? Fresh empirical insights from Vietnam," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 61-73.
    2. Ming Fang & Chiu-Lan Chang, 2022. "Nexus between fiscal imbalances, green fiscal spending, and green economic growth: empirical findings from E-7 economies," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 55(4), pages 2423-2443, November.
    3. Xu, Nuo & Kasimov, Ikboljon & Wang, Yanan, 2022. "Unlocking private investment as a new determinant of green finance for renewable development in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 1121-1130.
    4. Sun, Yi & Gao, Junjun, 2023. "Natural resource endowment and its lmpact on ecological efficiency," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(PB).
    5. Yu, Chenyang & Moslehpour, Massoud & Tran, Trung Kien & Trung, Lam Minh & Ou, Jenho Peter & Tien, Nguyen Hoang, 2023. "Impact of non-renewable energy and natural resources on economic recovery: Empirical evidence from selected developing economies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    6. Samuel Jack Anthony & Angus Morrison‐Saunders, 2023. "Analysing corporate forest disclosure: How does business value biodiversity?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 624-638, January.
    7. Wang, Jiangbo & Xue, Yefei & Han, Mingyang, 2023. "Impact of carbon emission price and natural resources development on the green economic recovery: Fresh insights from China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    8. Hongsheng Zhang & Wen-Qi Luo & Shangzhao Yang & Jinna Yu, 2023. "Impact of Covid-19 on economic recovery: empirical analysis from China and global economies," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 57-78, February.
    9. Wang, Yunxian & Wang, Xin & Zhang, Zheng & Cui, Zhanmin & Zhang, Yuan, 2023. "Role of fiscal and monetary policies for economic recovery in China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 51-63.
    10. Li, Ying & Mehmood, Nasir & Iqbal, Nadeem, 2022. "Natural resource abundance and financial development: A case study of emerging (E−15) economies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    11. Xiong, Wei & Jiang, Mengzhen & Tashkhodjaev, Mukhtorkhon & Pashayev, Zohrab, 2023. "Greening the economic recovery: Natural resource market efficiency as a key driver," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PB).
    12. Wu, Jie & Guluzada, Esmira & Karimzada, Mehriban, 2024. "The sustainable use of natural resource markets: Moving toward greener horizons," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    13. Zhang, Dongyang & Mohsin, Muhammad & Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad, 2022. "Does green finance counteract the climate change mitigation: Asymmetric effect of renewable energy investment and R&D," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:jeapmx:v:21:y:2019:i:02:n:s146433321950008x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/jeapm/jeapm.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.