[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/padxxx/v37y2017i3p217-226.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Cohesive is the Chinese Bureaucracy? A Case Study of Street‐level Bureaucrats in China

Author

Listed:
  • Ting Gong
  • Paul Collins
  • Hon Chan
  • Xiaowei Zang
Abstract
Institutional analyses of the developmental state claim that the principal source of state capacity is internal cohesiveness, which is defined as the tendency for the rank and file of the civil service to be in unity while working together towards national goals. In the literature on the China model, the strong capacity of the Chinese state has been taken for granted, and internal cohesiveness in the Chinese bureaucracy has not been problematized. This knowledge gap is narrowed by studying data on the Bureau of Urban Management (i.e. Chengguan) in China. Recent studies are reviewed of bureaucratic logics and behaviour that question the extent of collaboration between higher authorities and their subordinates (i.e. vertical cohesiveness) in China. Next, the essay theorizes about how these bureaucratic logics may also undermine collaboration among government bureaus (horizontal cohesiveness). Background information is offered about Chengguan and reports on the challenges identified by Chengguan officers to work with people in other bureaus. The research does not find any solid evidence of horizontal cohesiveness in the Chinese bureaucracy. This calls for an effort to reassess the validity of the China model. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Ting Gong & Paul Collins & Hon Chan & Xiaowei Zang, 2017. "How Cohesive is the Chinese Bureaucracy? A Case Study of Street‐level Bureaucrats in China," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 37(3), pages 217-226, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:padxxx:v:37:y:2017:i:3:p:217-226
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gabriela Lotta & Fernanda Lima-Silva & Arilson Favareto, 2022. "Dealing with violence: Varied reactions from frontline workers acting in highly vulnerable territories," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 40(2), pages 502-519, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:padxxx:v:37:y:2017:i:3:p:217-226. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0271-2075 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.