[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jpamgt/v21y2002i4p645-670.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stakeholder partnerships as collaborative policymaking: Evaluation criteria applied to watershed management in California and Washington

Author

Listed:
  • William D. Leach

    (Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California, Davis)

  • Neil W. Pelkey

    (Juniata College, Huntingdon, Pennsylvania)

  • Paul A. Sabatier

    (Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California, Davis)

Abstract
Public policymaking and implementation in the United States are increasingly handled through local, consensus-seeking partnerships involving most affected stakeholders. This paper formalizes the concept of a stakeholder partnership, and proposes techniques for using interviews, surveys, and documents to measure each of six evaluation criteria. Then the criteria are applied to 44 watershed partnerships in California and Washington. The data suggest that each criterion makes a unique contribution to the overall evaluation, and together the criteria reflect a range of partnership goals-both short-term and long-term, substantive and instrumental. Success takes time-frequently about 48 months to achieve major milestones, such as formal agreements and implementation of restoration, education, or monitoring projects. Stakeholders perceive that their partnerships have been most effective at addressing local problems and at addressing serious problems-not just uncontroversial issues, as previously hypothesized. On the other hand, they perceive that partnerships have occasionally aggravated problems involving the economy, regulation, and threats to property rights. © 2002 by the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management.

Suggested Citation

  • William D. Leach & Neil W. Pelkey & Paul A. Sabatier, 2002. "Stakeholder partnerships as collaborative policymaking: Evaluation criteria applied to watershed management in California and Washington," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(4), pages 645-670.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jpamgt:v:21:y:2002:i:4:p:645-670
    DOI: 10.1002/pam.10079
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/pam.10079
    File Function: Link to full text; subscription required
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/pam.10079?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beierle, Thomas C., 1998. "Public Participation in Environmental Decisions: An Evaluation Framework Using Social Goals," Discussion Papers 10497, Resources for the Future.
    2. Marie Lynn Miranda & James N Miller & Timothy L Jacobs, 2000. "Talking trash about landfills: Using quantitative scoring schemes in landfill siting processes," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(1), pages 3-22.
    3. Konisky, David & Beierle, Thomas, 1999. "Public Participation in Environmental Planning in the Great Lakes Region," RFF Working Paper Series dp-99-50, Resources for the Future.
    4. Beierle, Thomas C. & Konisky, David M., 1999. "Public Participation in Environmental Planning in the Great Lakes Region," Discussion Papers 10578, Resources for the Future.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luis Loures & Thomas Panagopoulos & Jon Bryan Burley, 2016. "Assessing user preferences on post-industrial redevelopment," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 43(5), pages 871-892, September.
    2. Thomas C. Beierle & David M. Konisky, 2000. "Values, conflict, and trust in participatory environmental planning," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(4), pages 587-602.
    3. Catherine A Cunningham & John P Tiefenbacher, 2008. "Evaluating the Effectiveness of Public Participation Efforts by Environmental Agencies: Repermitting a Smelter in El Paso, Texas, USA," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 26(4), pages 841-856, August.
    4. Johanna Olsson & Lotta Andersson, 2007. "Possibilities and problems with the use of models as a communication tool in water resource management," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 21(1), pages 97-110, January.
    5. J. Wouters & A. Marx & N. Hachez, 2012. "Public and Private Food Safety Standards and International Trade Law. How to Build a Balanced Relationship," Chapters, in: Axel Marx & Miet Maertens & Johan Swinnen & Jan Wouters (ed.), Private Standards and Global Governance, chapter 10, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Leslie Carnoye & Rita Lopes, 2015. "Participatory Environmental Valuation: A Comparative Analysis of Four Case Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-23, July.
    7. Boley, B. Bynum & Maruyama, Naho & Woosnam, Kyle M., 2015. "Measuring empowerment in an eastern context: Findings from Japan," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 112-122.
    8. Sam Erevbenagie Usadolo & Marc Caldwel, 2016. "A Stakeholder Approach to Community Participation in a Rural Development Project," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(1), pages 21582440166, March.
    9. Shackley, Simon & Mander, Sarah & Reiche, Alexander, 2006. "Public perceptions of underground coal gasification in the United Kingdom," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(18), pages 3423-3433, December.
    10. Chen, M.C. & Ruijs, A. & Wesseler, J., 2005. "Solid waste management on small islands: the case of Green Island, Taiwan," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 31-47.
    11. Nuno Videira & Paula Antunes & Rui Santos & Sofia Gamito, 2003. "Participatory Modelling in Environmental Decision-Making: The Ria Formosa Natural Park Case Study," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 5(03), pages 421-447.
    12. S. Franceschini & G. Marletto, 2017. "The dynamics of social capital during public participation: new knowledge from an on-going monitoring," Working Paper CRENoS 201706, Centre for North South Economic Research, University of Cagliari and Sassari, Sardinia.
    13. Massimiliano Mazzanti & Anna Montini & Francesco Nicolli, 2011. "Embedding landfill diversion in economic, geographical and policy settings," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(24), pages 3299-3311.
    14. Asha Rajvanshi, 2003. "Promoting Public Participation for Integrating Sustainability Issues in Environmental Decision-Making: The Indian Experience," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 5(03), pages 295-319.
    15. Mazzanti, Massimiliano & Zoboli, Roberto, 2008. "Waste generation, waste disposal and policy effectiveness," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(10), pages 1221-1234.
    16. Badriyah Zakaria & Ramdzani Abdullah & Mohammad Firuz Ramli & Puziah Abdul Latif, 2013. "Selection criteria using the Delphi method for siting an integrated hazardous waste disposal facility in Malaysia," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(4), pages 512-530, May.
    17. Christopher Bruce & Kaveh Madani, "undated". "The Conditions for Successful Collaboration over Water Policy: Substance versus Process," Working Papers 2014-36, Department of Economics, University of Calgary, revised 03 Feb 2014.
    18. Jacqueline M. Vadjunec & Nicole M. Colston & Todd D. Fagin & Austin L. Boardman & Brian Birchler, 2022. "Fostering Resilience and Adaptation to Drought in the Southern High Plains: Using Participatory Methods for More Robust Citizen Science," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-23, February.
    19. Axel Marx & Jan Wouters, 2011. "Transatlantic Regulatory Cooperation: Conclusions and Implications," Chapters, in: David Vogel & Johan Swinnen (ed.), Transatlantic Regulatory Cooperation, chapter 12, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    20. Langer, Katharina & Decker, Thomas & Menrad, Klaus, 2017. "Public participation in wind energy projects located in Germany: Which form of participation is the key to acceptance?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 63-73.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jpamgt:v:21:y:2002:i:4:p:645-670. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/34787/home .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.