3.0.CO;2-I">
[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/agribz/v5y1989i6p607-618.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Some observations on the impact of advertising on demand

Author

Listed:
  • Jonq-Ying Lee

    (Florida Department of Citrus, and Adjunct Professor and Adjunct Associate Professor, Food and Resource Economics Department, University of Florida)

  • Mark G. Brown

    (Florida Department of Citrus, and Adjunct Professor and Adjunct Associate Professor, Food and Resource Economics Department, University of Florida)

  • Gary F. Fairchild

    (Food and Resource Economics Department, University of Florida)

Abstract
This article examines the decay structure of advertising and the incorporation of advertising in systems of demand equations by scaling and translating methods. Under the assumption that a consumer's purchase of an advertised product is directly related to his|her recall of a specific advertisement, the decay effect of advertising for everyday products is a monotonic decreasing function of time. In the scaling model, advertising has a tendency to be more effective when demand is price elastic (inelastic) given a quantity augmenting (diminishing) type scaling impact. In the translating model, the impact of advertising is related to the marginal propensity to consume.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonq-Ying Lee & Mark G. Brown & Gary F. Fairchild, 1989. "Some observations on the impact of advertising on demand," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 5(6), pages 607-618.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:agribz:v:5:y:1989:i:6:p:607-618
    DOI: 10.1002/1520-6297(198911)5:6<607::AID-AGR2720050606>3.0.CO;2-I
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Henry Kinnucan & Olan D. Forker, 1986. "Seasonality in the Consumer Response to Milk Advertising with Implications for Milk Promotion Policy," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 68(3), pages 562-571.
    2. Nichols, Len M, 1985. "Advertising and Economic Welfare," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 75(1), pages 213-218, March.
    3. Ward, Ronald W. & Chang, Julio, 1985. "Theoretical Issues Relating To Generic And Brand Advertising On Agricultural Commodities," Research on Effectiveness of Agricultural Commodity Promotion, April 9-10, 1985, Arlington, Virginia 279491, Regional Research Projects > NECC-63: Research Committee on Commodity Promotion.
    4. Stigler, George J & Becker, Gary S, 1977. "De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 67(2), pages 76-90, March.
    5. Ward, Ronald W. & Myers, Lester H., 1979. "Advertising Effectiveness and Coefficient Variation Over Time," Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 31(1), pages 1-11, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sartorius von Bach, Helmke, 1992. "Economic Aspects Of Advertising In Agriculture: A Review," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 31(1), March.
    2. Siskos, Y. & Matsatsinis, N. F. & Baourakis, G., 2001. "Multicriteria analysis in agricultural marketing: The case of French olive oil market," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(2), pages 315-331, April.
    3. Goddard, E.W., 1994. "Nec-63 Conference On Promotion In The Marketing Mix: What Works Where And Why," Promotion in the Marketing Mix: What Works, Where and Why, April 28-29, 1994, Toronto, Canada 279588, Regional Research Projects > NECC-63: Research Committee on Commodity Promotion.
    4. Brown, Mark G. & Lee, Jonq-Ying & Behr, Robert M., 1990. "Product Labeling, Advertising and Demand for Grapefruit Juice and Grapefruit-Juice Cocktail," 1990 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Vancouver, Canada 270898, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    5. Capps, Oral, Jr. & Seo, Seong-Cheon & Nichols, John P., 1997. "On The Estimation Of Advertising Effects For Branded Products: An Application To Spaghetti Sauces," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 29(2), pages 1-12, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ward, Ronald W. & Chang, Julio, 1985. "Theoretical Issues Relating To Generic And Brand Advertising On Agricultural Commodities," Research on Effectiveness of Agricultural Commodity Promotion, April 9-10, 1985, Arlington, Virginia 279491, Regional Research Projects > NECC-63: Research Committee on Commodity Promotion.
    2. Bester, Helmut & Petrakis, Emmanuel, 1995. "Price competition and advertising in oligopoly," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 1075-1088, June.
    3. Serafin Grundl & You Suk Kim, 2019. "Consumer mistakes and advertising: The case of mortgage refinancing," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 161-213, June.
    4. Nils‐Henrik M. von der Fehr & Kristin Stevik, 1998. "Persuasive Advertising and Product Differentiation," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 65(1), pages 113-126, July.
    5. Othman, Jamal B. & McIntosh, Christopher S. & Houston, Jack B., 1994. "Price Competition And Informational Product Differentiation Effectiveness: The Case Of Edible Vegetable Oils In The U.S," 1994 Annual Meeting, August 7-10, San Diego, California 271417, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    6. Serafin J. Grundl & You Suk Kim, 2017. "Consumer Mistakes and Advertising : The Case of Mortgage Refinancing," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2017-067, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    7. Lee, Jonq-Ying & Brown, Mark G., 1990. "Lag Structures in Commodity Advertising Research," 1990 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Vancouver, Canada 271019, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    8. Goddard, Ellen W. & Freebairn, John W. & Griffith, Garry R., 2003. "Issues in evaluating generic promotion in the food chain," 2003 Conference (47th), February 12-14, 2003, Fremantle, Australia 57871, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    9. Cardon, James H. & Pope, Rulon D., 2003. "Agricultural Market Structure, Generic Advertising, and Welfare," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 28(2), pages 1-16, August.
    10. Reberte, J. Carlos & Kaiser, Harry M. & Lenz, John E. & Forker, Olan D., 1996. "Generic Advertising Wearout: The Case Of The New York City Fluid Milk Campaign," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 21(2), pages 1-11, December.
    11. Richards, Timothy J. & Gao, X.M. & Patternson, Paul M., 1996. "Branded and Generic Promotion in a Complex Carbohydrate Demand System: A Structural Latent Variable Approach to Promotion Evaluation," Economic Evaluation of Commodity Promotion Programs in the Current Legal and Political Environment, October 7-8, 1996, Monterey, California 279667, Regional Research Projects > NECC-63: Research Committee on Commodity Promotion.
    12. Costa, Ecio de Farias & Epperson, James E. & Huang, Chung L. & McKissick, John C., 2002. "Impacts Of Advertising And Promotion On The Demand For Scanned Purchases Of Vidalia Onions," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 33(1), pages 1-10, March.
    13. Noel Blisard & James R. Blaylock, 1992. "A double-hurdle approach to advertising: The case of cheese," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 8(2), pages 109-120.
    14. Cox, Thomas L., 1989. "A Demand Systems Approach to the Analysis of Commodity Promotion Programs: The Case of Canadian Fats and Oils," Staff Papers 200478, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    15. James P. Gander, 2018. "Advertising Economics Under Uncertainty: An Alternative Approach," Working Paper Series, Department of Economics, University of Utah 2018_01, University of Utah, Department of Economics.
    16. Nicholas J. Powers, 1989. "A study of demand response to grocery advertising of fresh California-Arizona navel oranges," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 5(5), pages 423-435.
    17. Richard E. Just & Rulon D. Pope, 2017. "The many conditions under which monopolistic advertising can differ from the social optimum," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 41(3), pages 421-440, July.
    18. Azamat Valei, 2017. "Advertising Response to New Entry," CERGE-EI Working Papers wp588, The Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education - Economics Institute, Prague.
    19. Kinnucan, Henry W. & Chang, Hui-Shung (Christie) & Venkateswaran, Meenakshi, 1993. "Generic Advertising Wearout," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 61(03), pages 1-15, December.
    20. Alessio Emanuele Biondo & Roberto Cellini & Tiziana Cuccia, 2020. "Choices on museum attendance: An agent‐based approach," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(4), pages 882-897, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:agribz:v:5:y:1989:i:6:p:607-618. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6297 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.