[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wfo/monber/y2009i8p603-617.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovation: Anreize, Inputfaktoren und Output im Spiegel der österreichischen Wirtschaftsstruktur

Author

Listed:
  • Jürgen Janger
  • Andreas Reinstaller

    (WIFO)

Abstract
Zunehmend ist das Wirtschaftswachstum in Österreich durch Wissenschaft, Technologie und Innovation bestimmt. Der technologische Aufholprozess, der die Entwicklung bis Mitte der 1990er-Jahre prägte, ist abgeschlossen. Seither verbesserte sich die Innovationsleistung der Unternehmen stetig, die F&E-Quote stieg deutlich. Wie in anderen hochentwickelten Volkswirtschaften ist ein Strukturwandel zu ausbildungsintensiveren Wirtschaftszweigen zu beobachten, er erfolgt aber später und langsamer als in den meisten Ländern der EU 15. Wie die Systemevaluierung des österreichischen Innovationssystems durch WIFO, KMGA, Prognos Berlin und convelop zeigt, kann dieser Prozesses über eine Verbesserung der Rahmenbedingungen für Innovationen beschleunigt werden. Gegenüber den Innovationsspitzenreitern Dänemark, Finnland, Schweden und Schweiz bleibt Österreich insbesondere bezüglich der Indikatoren für das Bildungssystem, für die Innovationsfinanzierung und für die Wettbewerbspolitik deutlich zurück.

Suggested Citation

  • Jürgen Janger & Andreas Reinstaller, 2009. "Innovation: Anreize, Inputfaktoren und Output im Spiegel der österreichischen Wirtschaftsstruktur," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 82(8), pages 603-617, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:wfo:monber:y:2009:i:8:p:603-617
    Note: With English abstract.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.wifo.ac.at/wwa/pubid/36365
    File Function: abstract
    Download Restriction: Payment required
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Petra Moser, 2005. "How Do Patent Laws Influence Innovation? Evidence from Nineteenth-Century World's Fairs," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 95(4), pages 1214-1236, September.
    2. James J. Heckman, 2005. "Lessons from the Technology of Skill Formation," NBER Working Papers 11142, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Michael Peneder, 2009. "Sectoral Growth Drivers and Competitiveness in the European Union," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 57710, January.
    4. Lynne G. Zucker & Michael R. Darby, 2009. "Star Scientists, Innovation and Regional and National Immigration," Chapters, in: David B. Audretsch & Robert E. Litan & Robert Strom (ed.), Entrepreneurship and Openness, chapter 6, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Jürgen Janger & Hans Pechar, 2010. "Organisatorische Rahmenbedingungen für die Entstehung und Nachhaltigkeit wissenschaftlicher Qualität an Österreichs Universitäten," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 40013, March.
    6. Paul M. Romer, 2001. "Should the Government Subsidize Supply or Demand in the Market for Scientists and Engineers?," NBER Chapters, in: Innovation Policy and the Economy, Volume 1, pages 221-252, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Willi Leibfritz & Jürgen Janger, 2007. "Boosting Austria's Innovation Performance," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 580, OECD Publishing.
    8. Michael Peneder, 1999. "The Austrian Paradox: "Old" Structures but High Performance?," Austrian Economic Quarterly, WIFO, vol. 4(4), pages 239-247, October.
    9. Donald S. Siegel & Mike Wright, 2007. "Intellectual property: the assessment," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 23(4), pages 529-540, Winter.
    10. Florence Jaumotte & Nigel Pain, 2005. "From Ideas to Development: The Determinants of R&D and Patenting," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 457, OECD Publishing.
    11. Helmut Gassler & Brigitte Nones, 2008. "Internationalisation of R&D and embeddedness: the case of Austria," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 407-421, August.
    12. Michael Peneder, 2007. "A sectoral taxonomy of educational intensity," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 34(3), pages 189-212, July.
    13. Michael Peneder & Gerhard Schwarz, 2008. "Venture Capital: Ergebnisse der Wirkungsanalyse für Österreich," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 81(6), pages 461-471, June.
    14. Werner Hölzl & Peter Huber & Serguei Kaniovski & Michael Peneder, 2006. "Teilstudie 20: Neugründung und Entwicklung von Unternehmen," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 27459, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Werner Hölzl & Klaus Friesenbichler & Agnes Kügler & Michael Peneder & Andreas Reinstaller & Gerhard Schwarz, 2016. "Österreich 2025 – Industrie 2025: Wettbewerbsfähigkeit, Standortfaktoren, Markt- und Produktstrategien und die Positionierung österreichischer Unternehmen in der internationalen Wertschöpfungskette," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 59184, March.
    2. Gunther Tichy, 2017. "Mangelnde Effizienz als Erfolgsbremse," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 90(9), pages 677-699, September.
    3. Karl Aiginger & Marcus Scheiblecker, 2016. "Österreich 2025 – Eine Agenda für mehr Dynamik, sozialen Ausgleich und ökologische Nachhaltigkeit. Fortschrittsbericht," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 58885, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stefan Ederer & Jürgen Janger, 2010. "Wachstums- und Beschäftigungspolitik in Österreich unter europäischen Rahmenbedingungen," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 41042, March.
    2. Jürgen Janger & Michael Böheim & Martin Falk & Rahel Falk & Werner Hölzl & Daniela Kletzan-Slamanig & Michael Peneder & Andreas Reinstaller & Fabian Unterlass & Gunther Tichy, 2010. "Research and Innovation Policy after the Crisis," Austrian Economic Quarterly, WIFO, vol. 15(4), pages 321-335, December.
    3. Stefan Ederer & Jürgen Janger & Serguei Kaniovski & Daniela Kletzan-Slamanig & Johannes Berger & Ines Fortin & Helmut Hofer & Iain Paterson & Edith Skriner & Karin Schönpflug & Ulrich Schuh & Wolfgang, 2011. "Assessing the Lisbon Strategy 2005-2010 and Estimating Expected Effects from Reaching the EU 2020 Goals," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 41747, March.
    4. Jürgen Janger & Werner Hölzl & Serguei Kaniovski & Johannes Kutsam & Michael Peneder & Andreas Reinstaller & Susanne Bärenthaler-Sieber & Isabel Stadler & Fabian Unterlass, 2011. "Structural Change and the Competitiveness of EU Member States," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 42956, March.
    5. Aurelien Quignon, 2022. "Market Regulation and Innovation: Direct and Indirect Effects," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 429-456, December.
    6. Jürgen Janger, 2012. "Strukturwandel und Wettbewerbsfähigkeit in der EU," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 85(8), pages 625-640, August.
    7. Jürgen Janger & Michael Böheim & Martin Falk & Rahel Falk & Werner Hölzl & Daniela Kletzan-Slamanig & Michael Peneder & Andreas Reinstaller & Fabian Unterlass, 2010. "Forschungs- und Innovationspolitik nach der Krise. WIFO-Positionspapier zur FTI-Strategie 2020," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 40225, March.
    8. Jürgen Janger & Michael Böheim & Martin Falk & Rahel Falk & Werner Hölzl & Daniela Kletzan-Slamanig & Michael Peneder & Andreas Reinstaller & Fabian Unterlass, 2010. "Forschungs- und Innovationspolitik nach der Wirtschaftskrise," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 83(8), pages 675-689, August.
    9. Hua Tang, 2022. "The Effect of ESG Performance on Corporate Innovation in China: The Mediating Role of Financial Constraints and Agency Cost," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, March.
    10. Lamberova, Natalia, 2021. "The puzzling politics of R&D: Signaling competence through risky projects," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 801-818.
    11. Luigi Aldieri & Concetto Paolo Vinci, 2019. "Firm Size and Sustainable Innovation: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-9, May.
    12. Alex Bell & Raj Chetty & Xavier Jaravel & Neviana Petkova & John Van Reenen, 2019. "Who Becomes an Inventor in America? The Importance of Exposure to Innovation," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 134(2), pages 647-713.
    13. Michael J. Andrews, 2020. "Local Effects of Land Grant Colleges on Agricultural Innovation and Output," NBER Chapters, in: Economics of Research and Innovation in Agriculture, pages 139-175, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Fontana, Roberto & Nuvolari, Alessandro & Shimizu, Hiroshi & Vezzulli, Andrea, 2013. "Reassessing patent propensity: Evidence from a dataset of R&D awards, 1977–2004," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(10), pages 1780-1792.
    15. Bert Minne & Marc van der Steeg & Dinand Webbink, 2008. "Skill gaps in the EU: role for education and training policies," CPB Document 162, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    16. Benjamin Jones & Michael Keen & Jon Strand, 2013. "Fiscal implications of climate change," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 20(1), pages 29-70, February.
    17. Veronika Frigyesi & Patrice Laget & Mark Boden, 2019. "Exploitation of patent information in R&D output analysis for policymaking," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 121(3), pages 1717-1736, December.
    18. B. Zorina Khan, 2014. "Of Time and Space: Technological Spillovers among Patents and Unpatented Innovations during Early U.S. Industrialization," NBER Working Papers 20732, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. John Van Reenen, 2022. "Innovation and Human Capital Policy," NBER Chapters, in: Innovation and Public Policy, pages 61-83, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Paolo Buonanno & Francesco Cinnirella & Elona Harka & Marcello Puca, 2024. "Books Go Public: The Consequences of the Expropriation of Monastic Libraries on Innovation," CESifo Working Paper Series 11015, CESifo.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wfo:monber:y:2009:i:8:p:603-617. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Florian Mayr (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wifooat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.