[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/quantf/v22y2022i12p2257-2274.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A data-driven explainable case-based reasoning approach for financial risk detection

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Li
  • Florentina Paraschiv
  • Georgios Sermpinis
Abstract
The rapid development of artificial intelligence methods contributes to their wide applications for forecasting various financial risks in recent years. This study introduces a novel explainable case-based reasoning (CBR) approach without a requirement of rich expertise in financial risk. Compared with other black-box algorithms, the explainable CBR system allows a natural economic interpretation of results. Indeed, the empirical results emphasize the interpretability of the CBR system in predicting financial risk, which is essential for both financial companies and their customers. In addition, our results show that the proposed automatic design CBR system has a good prediction performance compared to other artificial intelligence methods, overcoming the main drawback of a standard CBR system of highly depending on prior domain knowledge about the corresponding field.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Li & Florentina Paraschiv & Georgios Sermpinis, 2022. "A data-driven explainable case-based reasoning approach for financial risk detection," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(12), pages 2257-2274, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:quantf:v:22:y:2022:i:12:p:2257-2274
    DOI: 10.1080/14697688.2022.2118071
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14697688.2022.2118071
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14697688.2022.2118071?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. H G Li & D J Hand, 2002. "Direct versus indirect credit scoring classifications," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 53(6), pages 647-654, June.
    2. Eduard Sariev & Guido Germano, 2020. "Bayesian regularized artificial neural networks for the estimation of the probability of default," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 311-328, February.
    3. N G Pavlidis & D K Tasoulis & N M Adams & D J Hand, 2012. "Adaptive consumer credit classification," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 63(12), pages 1645-1654, December.
    4. Stevenson, Matthew & Mues, Christophe & Bravo, Cristián, 2021. "The value of text for small business default prediction: A Deep Learning approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(2), pages 758-771.
    5. Trivedi, Shrawan Kumar, 2020. "A study on credit scoring modeling with different feature selection and machine learning approaches," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    6. Salim Lahmiri & Stelios Bekiros, 2019. "Can machine learning approaches predict corporate bankruptcy? Evidence from a qualitative experimental design," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(9), pages 1569-1577, September.
    7. Carol E. Brown & James R. Coakley & Martha M. Eining, 1994. "The Fourth International Symposium on Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 3(3), pages 223-235, August.
    8. Brenna O'Roarty & Stanley McGreal & Alastair Adair & David Patterson, 1997. "Case-based reasoning and retail rent determination," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(4), pages 309-328, January.
    9. Sermpinis, Georgios & Tsoukas, Serafeim & Zhang, Ping, 2018. "Modelling market implied ratings using LASSO variable selection techniques," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 19-35.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Konstantin Häusler & Hongyu Xia, 2022. "Indices on cryptocurrencies: an evaluation," Digital Finance, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 149-167, September.
    2. Wei Li & Wolfgang Karl Hardle & Stefan Lessmann, 2022. "A Data-driven Case-based Reasoning in Bankruptcy Prediction," Papers 2211.00921, arXiv.org.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Salman Bahoo & Marco Cucculelli & Xhoana Goga & Jasmine Mondolo, 2024. "Artificial intelligence in Finance: a comprehensive review through bibliometric and content analysis," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 1-46, February.
    2. Caglayan, Mustafa & Pham, Tho & Talavera, Oleksandr & Xiong, Xiong, 2020. "Asset mispricing in peer-to-peer loan secondary markets," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    3. Christopher Gerling & Stefan Lessmann, 2023. "Multimodal Document Analytics for Banking Process Automation," Papers 2307.11845, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2023.
    4. Michael L. Polemis & Mike G. Tsionas, 2023. "The environmental consequences of blockchain technology: A Bayesian quantile cointegration analysis for Bitcoin," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(2), pages 1602-1621, April.
    5. Jaspreet Kaur & Madhu Vij & Ajay Kumar Chauhan, 2023. "Signals influencing corporate credit ratings—a systematic literature review," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 50(1), pages 91-114, March.
    6. Borchert, Philipp & Coussement, Kristof & De Weerdt, Jochen & De Caigny, Arno, 2024. "Industry-sensitive language modeling for business," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(2), pages 691-702.
    7. Mario Sanz-Guerrero & Javier Arroyo, 2024. "Credit Risk Meets Large Language Models: Building a Risk Indicator from Loan Descriptions in P2P Lending," Papers 2401.16458, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2024.
    8. Kriebel, Johannes & Stitz, Lennart, 2022. "Credit default prediction from user-generated text in peer-to-peer lending using deep learning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(1), pages 309-323.
    9. Sohrabi, Narges & Movaghari, Hadi, 2020. "Reliable factors of Capital structure: Stability selection approach," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 296-310.
    10. Caraiani, Petre, 2022. "Using LASSO-family models to estimate the impact of monetary policy on corporate investments," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    11. Shi, Yong & Qu, Yi & Chen, Zhensong & Mi, Yunlong & Wang, Yunong, 2024. "Improved credit risk prediction based on an integrated graph representation learning approach with graph transformation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(2), pages 786-801.
    12. Wen-Kuo Chen & Dalianus Riantama & Long-Sheng Chen, 2020. "Using a Text Mining Approach to Hear Voices of Customers from Social Media toward the Fast-Food Restaurant Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    13. Janssens, Bram & Schetgen, Lisa & Bogaert, Matthias & Meire, Matthijs & Van den Poel, Dirk, 2024. "360 Degrees rumor detection: When explanations got some explaining to do," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 317(2), pages 366-381.
    14. Kamesh Korangi & Christophe Mues & Cristi'an Bravo, 2021. "A transformer-based model for default prediction in mid-cap corporate markets," Papers 2111.09902, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2023.
    15. Ahmed Almustfa Hussin Adam Khatir & Marco Bee, 2022. "Machine Learning Models and Data-Balancing Techniques for Credit Scoring: What Is the Best Combination?," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-22, August.
    16. Ayşe Özmen, 2023. "Sparse regression modeling for short- and long‐term natural gas demand prediction," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 322(2), pages 921-946, March.
    17. Georgios Sermpinis & Serafeim Tsoukas & Ping Zhang, 2019. "What influences a bank's decision to go public?," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(4), pages 1464-1485, October.
    18. Alex Coad & Stjepan Srhoj, 2020. "Catching Gazelles with a Lasso: Big data techniques for the prediction of high-growth firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 541-565, October.
    19. Korangi, Kamesh & Mues, Christophe & Bravo, Cristián, 2023. "A transformer-based model for default prediction in mid-cap corporate markets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(1), pages 306-320.
    20. Hirk, Rainer & Vana, Laura & Hornik, Kurt, 2022. "A corporate credit rating model with autoregressive errors," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 224-240.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C51 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Model Construction and Estimation
    • C52 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Model Evaluation, Validation, and Selection
    • C53 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Forecasting and Prediction Models; Simulation Methods
    • C61 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis
    • C63 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Computational Techniques
    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:quantf:v:22:y:2022:i:12:p:2257-2274. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RQUF20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.