[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/clarxx/v49y2024i1p48-63.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Revolution and continuity? Reassessing nineteenth-century moorland reclamation through palaeoecological and archival research

Author

Listed:
  • Leonard Baker
  • Francis M. Rowney
  • Henry French
  • Ralph M. Fyfe
Abstract
The upland moorlands of Britain are environmentally and culturally important ecosystems. Yet, our understanding of historical attempts to ‘reclaim’ these landscapes is often based upon incomplete accounts of agricultural ‘improvement’. Studies of historical landscape change have frequently focused on singular ‘revolutionary’ moments due to the limitation and biases of surviving historical sources, which has created a contemporary fixation on ‘reversing’ singular interventions. By combining palaeoecological data (pollen, coprophilous fungal spores and microcharcoal) from a recent study of five upland sites with newly rediscovered archival documents, this paper details the differences between how nineteenth-century actors described ecological interventions and some of their actual characteristics and consequences. Through interdisciplinary synthesis, we reveal how perceptions of ecological change were filtered and shaped by the sensibilities and motivations of ‘improvers’. This enables us to position ‘reclamation’ within a sequence of long-term management practices that shaped these complex ecosystems.

Suggested Citation

  • Leonard Baker & Francis M. Rowney & Henry French & Ralph M. Fyfe, 2024. "Revolution and continuity? Reassessing nineteenth-century moorland reclamation through palaeoecological and archival research," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(1), pages 48-63, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:clarxx:v:49:y:2024:i:1:p:48-63
    DOI: 10.1080/01426397.2023.2244904
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01426397.2023.2244904
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01426397.2023.2244904?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:clarxx:v:49:y:2024:i:1:p:48-63. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/clar20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.