[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/sfb475/200030.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Testing for unit roots in the context of misspecified logarithmic random walks

Author

Listed:
  • Krämer, Walter
  • Davies, Laurie
Abstract
Testing for unit roots has been among the most heavily researched topics in Econometrics for the last quarter of a century. Much less researched is the equally important issue of the appropriate transformation if any of the variable of interest which should preceed any such testing. In macroeconometrics and empirical finance (stock prices, exchange rates) there are often compelling arguments in favor of a logarithmic transformation. Elsewhere, for instance in the modelling of interest rates, a levels specification automatically suggests itself. In many applications, however, it is not a priori clear, given that one suspects a unit root, whether this unit root is present in the levels or the logs, so there is certainly some interest in the testing for unit roots in the context of an incompletely specified nonlinear transformation of the data . This issue can be approached from various angles: One is to check which transformations leave the I (1)-property of a time series intact, the presumption being that any such transformation could then do little damage to the null distribution of a test for unit roots (Granger and Hallmann 1991; Ermini and Granger 1993 Corradi 1995). A related one is to use tests whose null distribution is robust to monotonic transformations, whether the transformed data are I (1) or not (Granger and Hallmann 1991 , Burridge and Guerre 1996 , Gourieroux and Breitung 1999) or to embed the levels and log specifications respectively in a general Box-Cox-framework and to estimate the transformation parameter before testing (Franses and McAleer 1998, Franses and Koop 1998 , Kobayashi and McAleer 1999). The present paper continues along the lines of Granger and Hallmann (1991) by focussing on a conventional test procedure, the standard Dickey-Fuller-test, and by investigating its properties under a misspecified nonlinear transformation in particular, investigating whether an existing unit root is still detected, i.e. the null hypothesis of an existing unit root is not rejected when an inappropriate transformation is applied. Given that this test is widely employed and given that the choice between a linear and a log linear specification is often rather haphazardly done in applications, it is important to know the degree to which the acceptance of the null hypothesis depends on the correctness of the data transformation. Granger and Hallmann (1991) find through Monte Carlo that the standard Dickey-Fuller-test overrejects a correct null hypotheses of a random walk in the logs, when the test is instead applied to the levels. Below we prove analytically that the rejection probability can take arbitrary values between zero and one for any sample size. An analogous result obtains when the levels follow a random walk, but the Dickey-Fuller-test is applied to the logs. Again, the rejection probability is shown to be depend on both the sample size and the innovation variance, so the null distribution of the DF-test is extremely non-robust to improper data transformations.

Suggested Citation

  • Krämer, Walter & Davies, Laurie, 2000. "Testing for unit roots in the context of misspecified logarithmic random walks," Technical Reports 2000,30, Technische Universität Dortmund, Sonderforschungsbereich 475: Komplexitätsreduktion in multivariaten Datenstrukturen.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:sfb475:200030
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/77167/2/2000-30.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ermini, Luigi & Granger, Clive W. J., 1993. "Some generalizations on the algebra of I(1) processes," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 58(3), pages 369-384, August.
    2. Stock, James H., 1994. "Deciding between I(1) and I(0)," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 105-131, July.
    3. Park, Joon Y. & Phillips, Peter C.B., 1999. "Asymptotics For Nonlinear Transformations Of Integrated Time Series," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(3), pages 269-298, June.
    4. Philip Hans Franses & Michael McAleer, 1998. "Testing for Unit Roots and Non‐linear Transformations," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(2), pages 147-164, March.
    5. Breitung, Jorg & Gourieroux, Christian, 1997. "Rank tests for unit roots," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 81(1), pages 7-27, November.
    6. Burridge, Peter & Guerre, Emmanuel, 1996. "The Limit Distribution of level Crossings of a Random Walk, and a Simple Unit Root Test," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(4), pages 705-723, October.
    7. Nelson, Charles R. & Plosser, Charles I., 1982. "Trends and random walks in macroeconmic time series : Some evidence and implications," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 139-162.
    8. Franses, Philip Hans & Koop, Gary, 1998. "On the sensitivity of unit root inference to nonlinear data transformations," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 59(1), pages 7-15, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Helmut Lütkepohl & Fang Xu, 2012. "The role of the log transformation in forecasting economic variables," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 619-638, June.
    2. Yoon, Gawon, 2005. "An introduction to I([infinity]) processes," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 473-483, May.
    3. Corradi, Valentina & Swanson, Norman R., 2006. "The effect of data transformation on common cycle, cointegration, and unit root tests: Monte Carlo results and a simple test," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 132(1), pages 195-229, May.
    4. Sakiru Adebola Solarin, 2017. "Testing for the Stationarity in Total Factor Productivity: Nonlinearity Evidence from 79 Countries," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 8(1), pages 141-158, March.
    5. Tuck Cheong Tang & Koi Nyen Wong, 2009. "Research Note: The SARS Epidemic and International Visitor Arrivals to Cambodia: Is the Impact Permanent or Transitory?," Tourism Economics, , vol. 15(4), pages 883-890, December.
    6. Krämer Walter, 2002. "Statistische Besonderheiten von Finanzzeitreihen / Statistical Properties of Financial Time Series," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 222(2), pages 210-229, April.
    7. Damen, Sven & Vastmans, Frank & Buyst, Erik, 2016. "The effect of mortgage interest deduction and mortgage characteristics on house prices," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 15-29.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aparicio, Felipe M. & García, Ana, 2003. "Range unit root tests," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS ws031126, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.
    2. Corradi, Valentina & Swanson, Norman R., 2006. "The effect of data transformation on common cycle, cointegration, and unit root tests: Monte Carlo results and a simple test," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 132(1), pages 195-229, May.
    3. Krämer Walter, 2002. "Statistische Besonderheiten von Finanzzeitreihen / Statistical Properties of Financial Time Series," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 222(2), pages 210-229, April.
    4. Aparicio, Felipe M., 2003. "On the record properties of integrated time series," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS ws036414, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.
    5. Hong, Seung Hyun & Phillips, Peter C. B., 2010. "Testing Linearity in Cointegrating Relations With an Application to Purchasing Power Parity," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 28(1), pages 96-114.
    6. Yoon, Gawon, 2005. "An introduction to I([infinity]) processes," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 473-483, May.
    7. Morana, Claudio, 2024. "A new macro-financial condition index for the euro area," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 64-87.
    8. Lorenzo Trapani, 2021. "Testing for strict stationarity in a random coefficient autoregressive model," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(3), pages 220-256, April.
    9. Xiao, Zhijie, 2012. "Robust inference in nonstationary time series models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 169(2), pages 211-223.
    10. Alexeev, Vitali & Maynard, Alex, 2012. "Localized level crossing random walk test robust to the presence of structural breaks," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(11), pages 3322-3344.
    11. Gilles Dufrénot & Valérie Mignon, 2002. "La cointégration non linéaire : une note méthodologique," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 155(4), pages 117-137.
    12. Niels Haldrup & Robinson Kruse & Timo Teräsvirta & Rasmus T. Varneskov, 2013. "Unit roots, non-linearities and structural breaks," Chapters, in: Nigar Hashimzade & Michael A. Thornton (ed.), Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Empirical Macroeconomics, chapter 4, pages 61-94, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. Helmut Lütkepohl & Fang Xu, 2012. "The role of the log transformation in forecasting economic variables," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 619-638, June.
    14. Berenguer-Rico, Vanessa & Gonzalo, Jesús, 2014. "Summability of stochastic processes—A generalization of integration for non-linear processes," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 178(P2), pages 331-341.
    15. Razvan Pascalau, 2010. "Unit root tests with smooth breaks: an application to the Nelson-Plosser data set," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(6), pages 565-570.
    16. Yamin Ahmad & Adam Check & Ming Chien Lo, 2024. "Unit Roots in Macroeconomic Time Series: A Comparison of Classical, Bayesian and Machine Learning Approaches," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 63(6), pages 2139-2173, June.
    17. Mehmet Balcilar, 2007. "Point Optimal Invariant Tests of a Unit Root in Models with Structural Change," Working Papers 15-50, Eastern Mediterranean University, Department of Economics.
    18. Berenguer Rico, Vanessa, 2011. "Summability of stochastic processes: a generalization of integration and co-integration valid for non-linear processes," UC3M Working papers. Economics we1115, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía.
    19. Ahn & Byung Chul, 1994. "Testing the null of stationarity in the presence of structural breaks for multiple time series," Econometrics 9411001, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 08 Nov 1994.
    20. Christian Gourieroux & Joann Jasiak, 2011. "Nonlinear Persistence and Copersistence," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Greg N. Gregoriou & Razvan Pascalau (ed.), Nonlinear Financial Econometrics: Markov Switching Models, Persistence and Nonlinear Cointegration, chapter 4, pages 77-103, Palgrave Macmillan.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:sfb475:200030. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/isdorde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.