[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/diedps/62023.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

(R)evolution? Exploring the potential of post-development approaches for reforming development cooperation

Author

Listed:
  • Köllner, Francy
Abstract
The concept and mainstream approaches of development cooperation (DC) have been criticised since the early beginning of their existence. Post-development (PD) scholars have been criticising international DC since 1990 for both its Western perspective and the lack of reflection on asymmetrical power structures. Since also today DC has to face a variety of criticisms, we perceive PD approaches as a starting point for efforts towards change. We asked (1) to what extent and how elements of post-development approaches are reflected in the current policy initiatives of international DC, and (2) what potential do PD approaches have to reform DC. We analysed three examples: German feminist development policy (FemDP) as a relatively new idea of transformation, the locally led development approach as a long-standing concept and Global Public Investment (GPI) as an approach towards a new concept of international cooperation. By means of a content analysis, four commonly used PD elements were selected and slightly adapted to examine whether and how the three policy initiatives acknowledge PD aspects in order to reform DC: (1) the concept of alternatives to development, (2) pluralism of knowledge and power dynamics, (3) user-centred approaches and a critical stance towards the established scientific discourse and (4) the promotion of grassroots movements and local ownership. We discovered a variation in the use of the different PD elements. Although aspects related to power relations, post-colonial structures and knowledge management are prominent in all three initiatives, elements such as grassroots movements are given less consideration in all three cases. Even though FemDP does not focus on an alternative to development, as defined by PD approaches, it puts a strong emphasis on a transformative approach when it comes to its user-centred empowerment and tackles power imbalances by approaching decolonisation. Subsequently, the efforts of German Development Minister Svenja Schulze do not just describe a rhetorical reorientation but involve actual transformative efforts. However, further implementation efforts need to be analysed. The locally led development approach seems to be a suitable springboard for the inclusion of local knowledge and grassroots movements. Whereas the approach mostly uses descriptions of change as a means to reach its objectives, the GPI concept in particular uses PD elements as a reformative approach, as per the PD definition, putting the objective of the transformation of international public finance in international cooperation at its centre. Valuing PD approaches, we conclude that they do influence public initiatives in one way or another. In the future, if inner-systemic change should become an option, we see the greatest added value when PD scholars succeed in underpinning their approaches with instruments that can be used as tools in DC practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Köllner, Francy, 2023. "(R)evolution? Exploring the potential of post-development approaches for reforming development cooperation," IDOS Discussion Papers 6/2023, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:diedps:62023
    DOI: 10.23661/idp6.2023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/270998/1/1839618035.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.23661/idp6.2023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bracho, Gerardo & Carey, Richard H. & Hynes, William & Klingebiel, Stephan & Trzeciak-Duval, Alexand (ed.), 2021. "Origins, evolution and future of global development cooperation: The role of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC)," IDOS Studies, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS), volume 104, number 104, July.
    2. Bracho, Gerardo, 2015. "In search of a narrative for Southern providers: the challenge of the emerging economies to the development cooperation agenda," IDOS Discussion Papers 1/2015, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    3. Niels Keijzer & Stephan Klingebiel & Fabian Scholtes, 2020. "Promoting ownership in a “post‐aid effectiveness” world: Evidence from Rwanda and Liberia," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 38(S1), pages 32-49, May.
    4. William Easterly, 2009. "Can the West Save Africa?," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 47(2), pages 373-447, June.
    5. Thomas MELONIO & Rémy Rioux & Jean-David Naudet, 2022. "Official Development Assistance at the Age of Consequences," Working Paper 056ec57b-8ec6-4e8d-93c8-9, Agence française de développement.
    6. Jean-Michel Severino & Olivier Ray, 2009. "Death and Rebirth of a Global Public Policy," Working Papers 167, Center for Global Development.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Monica Beuran & Gaël Raballand & Julio Revilla, 2011. "Improving Aid Effectiveness in Aid-Dependent Countries: Lessons from Zambia," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 11040, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    2. Chakraborty, Shankha & Papageorgiou, Chris & Sebastián, Fidel Pérez, 2016. "Health Cycles And Health Transitions," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(1), pages 189-213, January.
    3. James Copestake, 2010. "The global financial crisis of 2008-2009: an opportunity for development studies?," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(6), pages 699-713.
    4. Michael Hübler, 2017. "The Future of Foreign Aid in a Globalizing World with Climate Change," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 8(1), pages 41-51, February.
    5. Hermano, Víctor & Martín-Cruz, Natalia, 2013. "How to Deliver Foreign Aid? The Case of Projects Governed by the Spanish International Agency," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 298-314.
    6. Fenske, James, 2010. "Institutions in African history and development: A review essay," MPRA Paper 23120, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Temple, Jonathan R.W., 2010. "Aid and Conditionality," Handbook of Development Economics, in: Dani Rodrik & Mark Rosenzweig (ed.), Handbook of Development Economics, edition 1, volume 5, chapter 0, pages 4415-4523, Elsevier.
    8. Nathan Nunn, 2008. "The Long-term Effects of Africa's Slave Trades," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 123(1), pages 139-176.
    9. Samson Edo & Oluwatoyin Matthew & Ifeoluwa Ogunrinola, 2022. "Foreign Development Assistance and Macroeconomic Policy Stance: The Underlying Levers of Growth in Emerging SSA Countries," Managing Global Transitions, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, vol. 20(4 (Winter), pages 353-374.
    10. Annalisa Prizzon & Romilly Greenhill & Shakira Mustapha, 2017. "An ‘age of choice’ for external development finance? Evidence from country case studies," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 35, pages 29-45, July.
    11. Alice Nicole Sindzingre, 2021. "Truth vs justification: contrasting heterodox and mainstream thinking on development via the example of austerity in Africa," CEPN Working Papers hal-03139457, HAL.
    12. Patrick GUILLAUMONT, 2009. "Aid effectiveness for poverty reduction: macroeconomic overview and emerging issues," Working Papers P05, FERDI.
    13. Victor, David G., 2013. "Foreign Aid for Capacity-Building to Address Climate Change: Insights and Applications," WIDER Working Paper Series 084, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    14. Sumner, Andy, 2012. "Where Do The Poor Live?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 40(5), pages 865-877.
    15. Ilaski Barañano & Marta San Martín, 2015. "The Impact of Foreign Aid Linked to Infrastructure and Pollution Abatement," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(4), pages 667-686, September.
    16. Abigail R. Hall-Blanco, 2016. "Why Development Programmes Fail: William Easterly and the Political Economy of Intervention," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 175-183, June.
    17. Michael Clemens, Gabriel Demombynes, 2013. "The New Transparency in Development Economics: Lessons from the Millennium Villages Controversy," Working Papers 342, Center for Global Development.
    18. Robin Davies & Jonathan Pickering, 2017. "How should development co-operation evolve? Views from developing countries," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 35, pages 10-28, July.
    19. Scandizzo Pasquale Lucio & Cufari Daniele, 2023. "Beyond Cost Benefit Analysis: A SAM Model for Project-Program Evaluation," Working Papers 18, SITES.
    20. Mengdi Wang & Xiaobing Peng, 2023. "How to Develop Sustainably after Poverty Alleviation in Poverty-Stricken Areas under Paired Assistance: A Quantitative Assessment Framework Based on System Dynamics Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-17, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:diedps:62023. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ditubde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.