[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mhe/chemon/2024-09.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Does telemedicine affect prescribing quality in primary care?

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Avdic

    (Deakin University)

  • Johannes S. Kunz

    (Monash University)

  • Susan J. Méndez

    (University of Melbourne)

  • Maria Wisniewska

    (Monash University)

Abstract
We study how the diffusion of telemedicine technology impacted the quality and rates of antibiotic prescriptions using Australian survey data from primary care physicians linked to administrative records on their service provision. We classify physicians based on their relative use of telemedicine consultations in response to the introduction of government-subsidised telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic and relate their rates of antibiotic prescriptions to indicators of prescribing quality before and after lockdown periods in a difference-in-differences design. Our results suggest that more frequent users of telemedicine prescribe relatively fewer antibiotics while keeping prescribing quality largely unchanged. We interpret these findings as evidence that telemedicine can enhance efficiency of service provision in primary care settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Avdic & Johannes S. Kunz & Susan J. Méndez & Maria Wisniewska, 2024. "Does telemedicine affect prescribing quality in primary care?," Papers 2024-09, Centre for Health Economics, Monash University.
    • Handle: RePEc:mhe:chemon:2024-09
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://monash-ch-econ-wps.s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/RePEc/mhe/chemon/2024-09.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matthew Berman & Andrea Fenaughty, 2005. "Technology and managed care: patient benefits of telemedicine in a rural health care network," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 14(6), pages 559-573, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jieun Chang & Scott J. Savage & Donald M. Waldman, 2017. "Estimating Willingness to Pay for Online Health Services with Discrete-Choice Experiments," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 491-500, August.
    2. Fuhmei Wang & Jung-Der Wang, 2021. "The Determinants of Telehealth Provision: Empirical Evidence from OECD Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-13, August.
    3. Matias Busso & Maria P. Gonzalez & Carlos Scartascini, 2022. "On the demand for telemedicine: Evidence from the COVID‐19 pandemic," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(7), pages 1491-1505, July.
    4. Antonio Lopez-Villegas & César Leal-Costa & Mercedes Perez-Heredia & Irene Villegas-Tripiana & Daniel Catalán-Matamoros, 2021. "Knowledge Update on the Economic Evaluation of Pacemaker Telemonitoring Systems," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-22, November.
    5. Sefa Awaworyi Churchill & Janet Exornam Ocloo & Diana Siawor-Robertson, 2017. "Ethnic Diversity and Health Outcomes," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 134(3), pages 1077-1112, December.
    6. Awaworyi Churchill, Sefa & Ocloo, Janet Exornam & Siawor-Robertson, Diana, 2015. "Ethnic diversity makes me sick! An examination of ethnic diversity’s effect on health outcomes," EconStor Preprints 123721, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    7. Anca M. Cotet & Daniel K. Benjamin, 2013. "Medical Regulation And Health Outcomes: The Effect Of The Physician Examination Requirement," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(4), pages 393-409, April.
    8. Jun Sun & Zhe Qu, 2015. "Understanding health information technology adoption: A synthesis of literature from an activity perspective," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(5), pages 1177-1190, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    telemedicine; primary care; quality of care; antibiotics; difference-in- differences;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H41 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Public Goods
    • I11 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Analysis of Health Care Markets
    • I13 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Insurance, Public and Private
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mhe:chemon:2024-09. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Johannes Kunz (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dxmonau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.