[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ipc/wpaper/162.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Social and Behaviour Change Communication (SBCC) project in Manica, Mozambique: baseline survey report

Author

Listed:
  • Mario Gyori

    (IPC-IG)

  • Tatiana Martínez Zavala

    (IPC-IG)

  • Jessica Baier

    (IPC-IG)

  • Maria Hernandez

    (IPC-IG)

  • Sofie Olsson

    (IPC-IG)

  • Alexis Lefevre

    (IPC-IG)

Abstract
No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Mario Gyori & Tatiana Martínez Zavala & Jessica Baier & Maria Hernandez & Sofie Olsson & Alexis Lefevre, 2017. "Social and Behaviour Change Communication (SBCC) project in Manica, Mozambique: baseline survey report," Working Papers 162, International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth.
    • Handle: RePEc:ipc:wpaper:162
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ipcig.org/sites/default/files/pub/en/WP162_Social_and_behaviour_change_communication.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2017
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bredl, Sebastian & Storfinger, Nina & Menold, Natalja, 2011. "A literature review of methods to detect fabricated survey data," Discussion Papers 56, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Center for international Development and Environmental Research (ZEU).
    2. Bredl, Sebastian & Winker, Peter & Kötschau, Kerstin, 2008. "A statistical approach to detect cheating interviewers," Discussion Papers 39, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Center for international Development and Environmental Research (ZEU).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kosyakova, Yuliya & Olbrich, Lukas & Sakshaug, Joseph & Schwanhäuser, Silvia, 2019. "Identification of interviewer falsification in the IAB-BAMF-SOEP Survey of Refugees in Germany," FDZ Methodenreport 201902_en, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    2. De Haas Samuel & Winker Peter, 2016. "Detecting Fraudulent Interviewers by Improved Clustering Methods – The Case of Falsifications of Answers to Parts of a Questionnaire," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 32(3), pages 643-660, September.
    3. Storfinger, Nina & Winker, Peter, 2011. "Robustness of clustering methods for identification of potential falsifications in survey data," Discussion Papers 57, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Center for international Development and Environmental Research (ZEU).
    4. Josten Michael & Trappmann Mark, 2016. "Interviewer Effects on a Network-Size Filter Question," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 32(2), pages 349-373, June.
    5. Kerstin Ruckdeschel & Lenore Sauer & Robert Naderi, 2016. "Reliability of retrospective event histories within the German Generations and Gender Survey," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 34(11), pages 321-358.
    6. Hatice Uenal & David Hampel, 2017. "Economic Aspects of the Missing Data Problem - the Case of the Patient Registry," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 65(5), pages 1779-1791.
    7. Schräpler Jörg-Peter, 2011. "Benford’s Law as an Instrument for Fraud Detection in Surveys Using the Data of the Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP)," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 231(5-6), pages 685-718, October.
    8. Michael Spagat, 2010. "Estimating the Human Costs of War: The Sample Survey Approach," HiCN Research Design Notes 14, Households in Conflict Network.
    9. Finn, Arden & Ranchhod, Vimal, 2013. "Genuine Fakes: The prevalence and implications of fieldworker fraud in a large South African survey," SALDRU Working Papers 115, Southern Africa Labour and Development Research Unit, University of Cape Town.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipc:wpaper:162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Andre Lyra (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipcunbr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.