[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hig/wpaper/69-law-2016.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Limits of the Judiciary within the Eurasian Integration Process

Author

Listed:
  • Maksim Karliuk

    (National Research University Higher School of Economics)

Abstract
The Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) has its own judicial body tasked with ensuring the uniform application of EAEU law by member states and institutions. The EAEU Court has a number of important powers; however, it is noteworthy, that such crucial ones as the preliminary ruling procedure and the ability to review actions of member states upon request of the EAEU regulatory body are missing. This paper reviews the missing powers in a search for the reasons behind their removal, and the ensuing ramifications. It also uncovers other limitations of the Eurasian judiciary and its strained relationships with national judiciaries. It is argued, that the EAEU Court will struggle to fulfil its mission without solutions compensating its limited powers

Suggested Citation

  • Maksim Karliuk, 2016. "The Limits of the Judiciary within the Eurasian Integration Process," HSE Working papers WP BRP 69/LAW/2016, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:hig:wpaper:69/law/2016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://wp.hse.ru/data/2016/11/02/1111132877/69LAW2016.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Eurasian integration; Eurasian Economic Union; Eurasian judiciary; Court of the Eurasian Economic Union; preliminary ruling; infringements.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K33 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - International Law

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hig:wpaper:69/law/2016. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Shamil Abdulaev or Shamil Abdulaev (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hsecoru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.