[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eei/rpaper/eeri_rp_2018_09.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Modeling ISIL terror attacks and their fatality rates with a Bayesian reversible jump marked point process

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew G. Chapple
Abstract
This paper attempts to find different time periods since ISIL’s formation in 2013 in which the rate of ISIL attacks or their effectiveness in terms of fatalities differ. A Bayesian model is presented for marked point process data that separates the time scale into disjoint intervals as a function of the rate of the attacks and the average number of fatalities for each attack which are the marks for the model. The model is endowed with priors to discourage intervals with few events and borrow strength among rates and intensities of adjacent intervals and uses the reversible jump approach introduced by Green (1996) to allow the number of intervals to vary as a function of the rates and intensities of attacks. Application results show that the hazard of an ISIL attack has increased drastically since 6/8/2014 since they took Mosul and again increased after 2/23/16, which corresponds with major military intervention.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew G. Chapple, 2018. "Modeling ISIL terror attacks and their fatality rates with a Bayesian reversible jump marked point process," EERI Research Paper Series EERI RP 2018/09, Economics and Econometrics Research Institute (EERI), Brussels.
    • Handle: RePEc:eei:rpaper:eeri_rp_2018_09
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.eeri.eu/documents/wp/EERI_RP_2018_09.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dario Gasbarra & S. R. Karia, 2000. "Analysis of Competing Risks by Using Bayesian Smoothing," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 27(4), pages 605-617, December.
    2. Andrew G. Chapple, 2016. "A Bayesian Reversible Jump Piecewise Hazard approach for modeling rate changes in mass shootings," Journal of Economics and Econometrics, Economics and Econometrics Society, vol. 59(3), pages 19-31.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mériem Saïd & Nadia Ghazzali & Louis-Paul Rivest, 2007. "Score tests for independence in parametric competing risks models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 16(3), pages 547-564, December.
    2. Djeundje, Viani Biatat & Crook, Jonathan, 2018. "Incorporating heterogeneity and macroeconomic variables into multi-state delinquency models for credit cards," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(2), pages 697-709.
    3. Pierpaolo De Blasi & Nils L. Hjort, 2007. "The Bernstein-Von Mises Theorem in Semiparametric Competing Risks Models," ICER Working Papers - Applied Mathematics Series 17-2007, ICER - International Centre for Economic Research.
    4. Fermanian, Jean-David, 2003. "Nonparametric estimation of competing risks models with covariates," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 85(1), pages 156-191, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Marked Point Process; Bayesian Analysis; Reversible Jump; ISIL.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C11 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Bayesian Analysis: General
    • C22 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Time-Series Models; Dynamic Quantile Regressions; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models; Diffusion Processes

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eei:rpaper:eeri_rp_2018_09. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Julia van Hove (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eeriibe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.