[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/lsuais/31673.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Export Behavior Of Louisiana Agribusiness Firms

Author

Listed:
  • Hughes, Karol W.
  • Kennedy, P. Lynn
  • Ortego, Albert
Abstract
The United States is a party to several trading blocks, including the North American Free Trade Agreement, and is a signatory to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. The impact of the new trading environment on the agribusiness sector depends on the business activities of individual firms. A survey of agribusiness firms was undertaken to gather information on their exporting experience and plans. The responses of exporters and non-exporters are presented. The likelihood of exporting increased with the size of a firm, both in terms of employee numbers an annual sales. The survey showed that for the majority of firms, exports accounted for less than 10% of total sales and that only a small number of companies had used government programs intended to aid exporters. These results indicate that agribusiness firms could benefit from programs that educate them on sources of export assistance.

Suggested Citation

  • Hughes, Karol W. & Kennedy, P. Lynn & Ortego, Albert, 1996. "Export Behavior Of Louisiana Agribusiness Firms," AEA Information Series 31673, Louisiana State University, Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:lsuais:31673
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.31673
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/31673/files/lsuae143.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.31673?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Unknown, 1995. "Foreign Agricultural Trade of the United States January/February 1995," Foreign Agricultural Trade of the United States (FATUS) 164392, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Unknown, 1994. "Foreign Agricultural Trade of the United States July/August 1994," Foreign Agricultural Trade of the United States (FATUS) 164389, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Josling, Timothy E. & Honma, Masayoshi & Lee, Jaeok & MacLaren, Donald & Miner, William M. & Sumner, Daniel A. & Tangermann, Stefan & Valdes, Alberto, 1994. "The Uruguay Round Agreement On Agriculture: An Evaluation," Commissioned Papers 14621, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    4. Nelson, Frederick J. & Simone, Mark V. & Valdes, Constanza M, 1995. "Comparison of Agricultural Support in Canada, Mexico, and the United States," Agricultural Information Bulletins 309734, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    5. Unknown, 1994. "Foreign Agricultural Trade of the United States May/June 1994," Foreign Agricultural Trade of the United States (FATUS) 163976, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    6. Unknown, 1995. "Foreign Agricultural Trade of the United States July/August 1995," Foreign Agricultural Trade of the United States (FATUS) 164393, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lynch, Loretta & Moulton, Kirby S, 1995. "Processing Costs for Canned Peaches," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt4vb9h61z, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    2. Kennedy, P. Lynn & Petrolia, Daniel R., 2001. "Disputes In Sugar And Agricultural-Based Sweeteners," Proceedings of the 6th Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshop, 2000: Trade Liberalization Under NAFTA: Report Card on Agriculture 16831, Farm Foundation, Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshops.
    3. Dermot J. Hayes & Frank H. Fuller, 1999. "Optimal Chinese Agricultural Trade Patterns under the Laws of Comparative Advantage," Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI) Publications (archive only) 99-wp233, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    4. Tropp, Debra & Skully, David & Link, John & Málaga, Jaime, 2002. "Mexico’s Changing Marketing System for Fresh Produce: Emerging Markets, Practices, Trends, and Issues," Analysis 317882, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Transportation and Marketing Program.
    5. Richards, Timothy J. & Patterson, Paul M., 1998. "Dynamic Complementarity In Export Promotion: The Market Access Program In Fruits And Vegetables," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 23(2), pages 1-19, December.
    6. Bolling, H. Christine & Neff, Steven & Handy, Charles R., 1998. "U.S. Foreign Direct Investment in the Western Hemisphere Processed Food Industry," Agricultural Economic Reports 34017, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    7. Kaufman, Phillip R. & Handy, Charles R. & McLaughlin, Edward W. & Park, Kristen & Green, Geoffrey M., 2000. "Understanding The Dynamics Of Produce Markets: Consumption And Consolidation Grow," Agricultural Information Bulletins 33747, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    8. Metcalfe, Mark R., 2001. "Environmental Regulation And Implications For Competitiveness In International Pork Trade," 2001: International Trade in Livestock Products Symposium, January 2001, Auckland, New Zealand 14565, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    9. Cong Tru Le & Harry M. Kaiser & William Tomek, 1998. "Export promotion and import demand for US red meat in selected Pacific Rim countries," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 14(2), pages 95-105.
    10. Ernstes, David P. & Outlaw, Joe L. & Schwart, Robert B. & Knutson, Ronald D., 1996. "Regulatory Implications of U.S.-Mexico Dairy Trade," Research Reports 257901, Texas A&M University, Agricultural and Food Policy Center.
    11. Tweeten, Luther G. & Sharples, Jerry A. & Evers-Smith, Linda, 1997. "Impact Of Cfta/Nafta On U.S. And Canadian Agriculture," Working Papers 28320, Ohio State University, Department of Agricultural, Environmental and Development Economics.
    12. Epperson, James E. & Estes, Edmund A., 1999. "Fruit And Vegetable Supply-Chain Management, Innovations, And Competitiveness: Cooperative Regional Research Project S-222," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 30(3), pages 1-6, November.
    13. Bjornlund, Britta & Cochrane, Nancy J. & Haley, Mildred M. & Hoskin, Roger & Liefert, Olga & Paarlberg, Philip L., 2002. "Livestock Sectors In The Economies Of Eastern Europe And The Former Soviet Union; Transition From Plan To Market And The Road Ahead," Agricultural Economic Reports 33977, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    14. Cassells, Sue M. & Meister, Anton D. & Rae, Allan N., 2000. "The Cost and Trade Impacts of Environmental Regulations: Effluent Controls and the New Zealand Dairy Sector," 2000 Conference (44th), January 23-25, 2000, Sydney, Australia 123618, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    15. Linda M. Aguilar & Mike A. Singer, 1995. "Big emerging markets and U.S. trade," Economic Perspectives, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, vol. 19(Jul), pages 2-14.
    16. Jonathan M. Harris, "undated". "Agriculture in a Global Perspective," GDAE Working Papers 01-04, GDAE, Tufts University.
    17. Lopez, Rigoberto A. & Hathie, Ibrahima, 2002. "Is Protection for Sale in U.S. Food Industries?," Research Reports 25182, University of Connecticut, Food Marketing Policy Center.
    18. Wills, Darryl S. & Lee, Chinkook, 1997. "U.S. Agricultural Exports: A Balanced Regional Model," 1997 Annual Meeting, July 13-16, 1997, Reno\ Sparks, Nevada 35941, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    19. Marin, Rebeca & Epperson, James E. & Ames, Glenn C.W., 1997. "A Probit Analysis of the Characteristics of Firms Engaged in the Fruit and Vegetable Trade Between the United States and Latin America," 1997 Annual Meeting, July 13-16, 1997, Reno\ Sparks, Nevada 35767, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    20. Alan Barkema & Mark Drabenstott, 1996. "Consolidation and change in heartland agriculture," Monograph, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, number 1996cacih, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:lsuais:31673. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dalsuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.