[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/anf/wpaper/26.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Women's ownership in land, their agency and tenure security: A case study of Maharashtra

Author

Listed:
  • Diya Uday
  • Ajay Shah

    (xKDR Forum)

  • Teesta Shukla

    (xKDR Forum)

Abstract
There is growing recognition of the role of land in achieving key Sustainable Development Goals such as gender equality and reduced inequalities. Yet, little is known about the fundamental question: how much land do women hold and control in India? A key reason for this is the informational gap in popular datasets and the work in India. Current work does not map (i) the de jure rights of women as reflected in land records; (ii) the linkage between de jure rights and de facto variables such as (a) women's control over their land assets or (b) their perceptions of tenure security. These elements together make up a whole, and a lack of understanding of one or the other presents an incomplete picture of the question of women's land ownership. The primary objective of this study is to undertake an accurate and comprehensive mapping of women's land rights, which converges de jure rights; and de facto control over land and perceptions of tenure security using a novel methodology which is a combination of desk and fieldwork. We first undertake mapping of two land tenures - ownership and lease in rural and urban districts in the sample state using parcel-level information in textual land records. We select Maharashtra as the environment under examination for three reasons: (i) the state has made considerable progress in digitising land records (ii) our previous fieldwork confirms high accordance between the ownership information on the records and ground (iii) the state has also digitised urban land records. We then select a sample set of parcels where women are de jure rights holders. We conducted a field survey to study two de facto variables: (a) their control over their land and (b) their perceptions of tenure security. In doing so, we propose a scalable and nuanced methodology to study the complex question of women's land. Our findings provide a data-backed foundation for answering questions on women's rights in land, their control over their land and their perceptions of tenure security for better-informed policy interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Diya Uday & Ajay Shah & Teesta Shukla, 2023. "Women's ownership in land, their agency and tenure security: A case study of Maharashtra," Working Papers 26, xKDR.
    • Handle: RePEc:anf:wpaper:26
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://papers.xkdr.org/papers/2023_xkdrEgovReportOnWomensLandOwnershipAndAgency.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2023
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cheryl Doss & Caitlin Kieran & Talip Kilic, 2020. "Measuring Ownership, Control, and Use of Assets," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(3), pages 144-168, July.
    2. Mishra, Khushbu & Sam, Abdoul G., 2016. "Does Women’s Land Ownership Promote Their Empowerment? Empirical Evidence from Nepal," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 360-371.
    3. Abhijit Banerjee & Lakshmi Iyer, 2005. "History, Institutions, and Economic Performance: The Legacy of Colonial Land Tenure Systems in India," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 95(4), pages 1190-1213, September.
    4. Cheryl Doss & Ruth Meinzen-Dick & Allan Bomuhangi, 2014. "Who Owns the Land? Perspectives from Rural Ugandans and Implications for Large-Scale Land Acquisitions," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 76-100, January.
    5. Allendorf, Keera, 2007. "Do Women's Land Rights Promote Empowerment and Child Health in Nepal?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 35(11), pages 1975-1988, November.
    6. Bina Agarwal & Pervesh Anthwal & Malvika Mahesh, 2021. "How Many and Which Women Own Land in India? Inter-gender and Intra-gender Gaps," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(11), pages 1807-1829, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Azka Rehman & Qing Ping & Amar Razzaq, 2019. "Pathways and Associations between Women’s Land Ownership and Child Food and Nutrition Security in Pakistan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Priniti Panday, 2020. "Women’s Empowerment and the Well-being of Children in Nepal," Journal of Developing Societies, , vol. 36(2), pages 129-154, June.
    3. Kumar, Sumit & Patel, Ratna & Chauhan, Shekhar, 2020. "Does land possession among working women empower them and improve their child health: A study based on National Family Health Survey-4," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    4. Subir Bairagi & Ashok K. Mishra & Dat Q. Tran, 2022. "Disentangling gender‐differentiated impacts on food security and poverty: Empirical evidence from Vietnam," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(3), pages 493-511, April.
    5. Hasanbasri, Ardina & Koolwal, Gayatri & Kilic, Talip & Moylan, Heather, 2021. "Multidimensionality of Land Ownership Among Men and Women in Sub-Saharan Africa," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315317, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    6. Wenmei Guo & Veeshan Rayamajhee & Alok K. Bohara, 2023. "Impacts of climate change on food utilization in Nepal," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(1), pages 630-659, February.
    7. Genicot, Garance & Hernandez-de-Benito, Maria, 2022. "Women’s land rights and village institutions in Tanzania," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    8. Burrone, Sara & Giannelli, Gianna Claudia, 2023. "Do Households Where Women Own Land Fare Better for Food Security? Evidence for Tanzania," IZA Discussion Papers 16382, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    9. Dagdeviren, Hulya & Oosterbaan, Lianne, 2022. "Gender differences in effective use of land rights in South India," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    10. Christian K. Darko & Kennedy K. Abrokwa, 2020. "Do you really need it? Educational mismatch and earnings in Ghana," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(4), pages 1365-1392, November.
    11. Veeshan Rayamajhee & Wenmei Guo & Alok K. Bohara, 2021. "The Impact of Climate Change on Rice Production in Nepal," Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 111-134, April.
    12. O'Hara, Corey & Clement, Floriane, 2018. "Power as agency: A critical reflection on the measurement of women’s empowerment in the development sector," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 111-123.
    13. My Nguyen & Kien Le, 2023. "The impacts of women's land ownership: Evidence from Vietnam," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(1), pages 158-177, February.
    14. van der Meulen Rodgers, Yana & Kassens, Alice Louise, 2018. "Women's asset ownership and children's nutritional status: Evidence from Papua New Guinea," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 100-107.
    15. Pradhan, Rajendra & Meinzen-Dick, Ruth Suseela & Theis, Sophie, 2018. "Property rights, intersectionality, and women’s empowerment in Nepal:," IFPRI discussion papers 1702, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    16. Parlow, Anton, 2018. "Women's Empowerment, Gendered Institutions and Economic Opportunity: An Investigative Study for Pakistan," MPRA Paper 86367, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Santos, Florence & Fletschner, Diana & Savath, Vivien & Peterman, Amber, 2014. "Can Government-Allocated Land Contribute to Food Security? Intrahousehold Analysis of West Bengal’s Microplot Allocation Program," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 860-872.
    18. Ambler, Kate & Doss, Cheryl & Kieran, Caitlin & Passarelli, Simone, 2022. "Spousal concordance in joint and separate households: Survey evidence from Nepal," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    19. Han, Wenjing & Zhang, Xiaoling & Zhang, Zhengfeng, 2019. "The role of land tenure security in promoting rural women’s empowerment: Empirical evidence from rural China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 280-289.
    20. Nayana Bose & Shreyasee Das, 2021. "Intergenerational effects of improving women’s property rights: evidence from India," Oxford Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(3), pages 277-290, July.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • K11 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Property Law

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:anf:wpaper:26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ami Dagli (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.papers.xkdr.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.