[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/adspcp/978-3-642-79877-1_11.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Utility Variability within Aggregate Spatial Units and its Relevance to Discrete Models of Destination Choice

In: New Directions in Spatial Econometrics

Author

Listed:
  • Mark R. Ferguson

    (McMaster University)

  • Pavlos S. Kanaroglou

    (McMaster University)

Abstract
In this chapter, we examine a logit model designed specifically for spatial choice among aggregate destinations. Typically, the logit and gravity models are applied to problems of spatial interaction without due consideration for the aggregation scale of the data. There is of course a general awareness that models estimated at different levels of aggregation will yield different parameter estimates but most researchers proceed directly with their analysis at the aggregate level and make no adjustments. Research on aggregation issues has been intertwined with work on the ‘modifiable areal unit problem’. This research examines how spatial Statistical models and diagnostics are affected by the aggregation scale and spatial configuration of spatial units. Choice processes per se, as are present in all problems of spatial interaction, are not specifically addressed in this body of research. Rather the focus is on the univariate or bivariate spatial processes associated with one or two spatially-referenced attributes [Openshaw (1984) and Arbia (1989)]. Aggregation issues are relevant in both scenarios but as will be illustrated in this chapter, the theoretical framework to accommodate aggregation in a choice context is quite different from that considered in analysis of the modifiable areal unit problem.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark R. Ferguson & Pavlos S. Kanaroglou, 1995. "Utility Variability within Aggregate Spatial Units and its Relevance to Discrete Models of Destination Choice," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Luc Anselin & Raymond J. G. M. Florax (ed.), New Directions in Spatial Econometrics, chapter 11, pages 243-269, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:adspcp:978-3-642-79877-1_11
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-79877-1_11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eymann, Angelika & Ronning, Gerd, 1996. "Microeconometric models of tourists' destination choise," Tübinger Diskussionsbeiträge 84, University of Tübingen, School of Business and Economics.
    2. Mark R. Ferguson & Pavlos S. Kanaroglou, 1997. "An Empirical Evaluation of the Aggregated Spatial Choice Model," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 20(1-2), pages 53-75, April.
    3. M. K. Haener & P. C. Boxall & W. L. Adamowicz & D. H. Kuhnke, 2004. "Aggregation Bias in Recreation Site Choice Models: Resolving the Resolution Problem," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 80(4).
    4. Eymann, Angelika & Ronning, Gerd, 1997. "Microeconometric models of tourists' destination choice," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 735-761, November.
    5. Merja Kauhanen & Hannu Tervo, 2002. "Who Moves to Depressed Regions? An Analysis of Migration Streams in Finland in the 1990s," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 25(2), pages 200-218, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:adspcp:978-3-642-79877-1_11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.