[go: up one dir, main page]

IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/f/pmu497.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Conan Mukherjee

Personal Details

First Name:Conan
Middle Name:
Last Name:Mukherjee
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:pmu497
http://iitbombay.academia.edu/ConanMukherjee

Affiliation

Economics
Indian Institute of Management Calcutta (IIMCAL)

Calcutta, India
http://www.iimcal.ac.in/faculty/Faculty.asp?FacultyGroupID=1
RePEc:edi:eciicin (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles

Working papers

  1. Andersson , Tommy & Mukherjee, Conan, 2018. "Seeking No War, Achieving No Peace: The Conflict over the Siachen Glacier," Working Papers 2018:14, Lund University, Department of Economics.
  2. Chatterjee, Kalyan & Mitra, Manipushpak & Mukherjee, Conan, 2015. "Bidding Rings: A Bargaining Approach," Working Papers 2015:1, Lund University, Department of Economics, revised 17 Jan 2016.

Articles

  1. Conan Mukherjee & Ranojoy Basu & Aftab Alam, 2020. "A measure of authorship by publications," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(3), pages 354-361, April.
  2. Conan Mukherjee, 2019. "On crony capitalism," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 46(1), pages 35-39, March.
  3. Conan Mukherjee, 2014. "Fair and group strategy-proof good allocation with money," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 42(2), pages 289-311, February.
  4. Conan Mukherjee, 2013. "Weak group strategy-proof and queue-efficient mechanisms for the queueing problem with multiple machines," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 42(1), pages 131-163, February.
  5. R. Krishnan & Conan Mukherjee, 2010. "Volatility in Indian Stock Markets," Journal of Emerging Market Finance, Institute for Financial Management and Research, vol. 9(1), pages 71-93, April.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Andersson , Tommy & Mukherjee, Conan, 2018. "Seeking No War, Achieving No Peace: The Conflict over the Siachen Glacier," Working Papers 2018:14, Lund University, Department of Economics.

    Cited by:

    1. Salah Salimian & Azadeh Ashrafi, 2024. "Resolving Conflicts and Strengthening International Relations with Investment: Game Theory Approach," Journal of Applied Economic Research, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 23(1), pages 59-81.

  2. Chatterjee, Kalyan & Mitra, Manipushpak & Mukherjee, Conan, 2015. "Bidding Rings: A Bargaining Approach," Working Papers 2015:1, Lund University, Department of Economics, revised 17 Jan 2016.

    Cited by:

    1. Baccara, Mariagiovanna & Asker, John & Lee, SangMok, 2021. "Patent Auctions and Bidding Coalitions: Structuring the Sale of Club Goods," CEPR Discussion Papers 15703, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.

Articles

  1. Conan Mukherjee & Ranojoy Basu & Aftab Alam, 2020. "A measure of authorship by publications," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(3), pages 354-361, April.

    Cited by:

    1. Kam C. Chan & Anna Fung & Hung‐Gay Fung & Jot Yau, 2020. "Coauthorship in academic journals: Implications for international collaboration and alliances," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(7), pages 1162-1173, October.

  2. Conan Mukherjee, 2014. "Fair and group strategy-proof good allocation with money," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 42(2), pages 289-311, February.

    Cited by:

    1. Hiroki Shinozaki, 2022. "Characterizing pairwise strategy-proof rules in object allocation problems with money," ISER Discussion Paper 1187, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University.
    2. Andersson, Tommy & Svensson, Lars-Gunnar, 2024. "Strategy-proof allocation of objects: A characterization result," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 1-5.
    3. Ranojoy Basu & Conan Mukherjee, 2024. "Characterization of maxmed mechanisms for multiple objects," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 28(2), pages 313-330, June.
    4. Conan Mukherjee, 2020. "On group strategyproof and optimal object allocation," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 8(2), pages 289-304, October.
    5. Shuhei Morimoto & Shigehiro Serizawa, 2012. "Strategy-proofness and Efficiency with Nonquasi-linear Preferences: A Characterization of Minimum Price Walrasian Rule," ISER Discussion Paper 0852, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University.
    6. Hagen, Martin, 2019. "Collusion-proof and fair auctions," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    7. Duygu Yengin & Youngsub Chun, 2015. "Welfare Lower Bounds and Strategyproofness in the Queueing Problem," School of Economics and Public Policy Working Papers 2015-11, University of Adelaide, School of Economics and Public Policy.
    8. Quadir, Abdul, 2017. "Spanning tree auctions: A complete characterization," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 1-8.
    9. Hagen, Martin, 2023. "Collusion-proof mechanisms for multi-unit procurement," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 281-298.
    10. Duygu Yengin, 2015. "No-Envy and Egalitarian-Equivalence under Multi-Object-Demand for Heterogeneous Objects," School of Economics and Public Policy Working Papers 2015-10, University of Adelaide, School of Economics and Public Policy.
    11. Debasis Mishra & Abdul Quadir, 2012. "Deterministic single object auctions with private values," Discussion Papers 12-06, Indian Statistical Institute, Delhi.
    12. Athanasiou, Efthymios, 2013. "A Solomonic solution to the problem of assigning a private indivisible good," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 369-387.
    13. Yuya Wakabayashi & Ryosuke Sakai & Hiroki Shinozaki, 2024. "Strategy-proof allocation problem with hard budget constraints and income effects: weak efficiency and fairness," OSIPP Discussion Paper 24E003, Osaka School of International Public Policy, Osaka University.
    14. Debasis Mishra & Abdul Quadir, 2014. "Non-bossy single object auctions," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 2(1), pages 93-110, April.

  3. Conan Mukherjee, 2013. "Weak group strategy-proof and queue-efficient mechanisms for the queueing problem with multiple machines," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 42(1), pages 131-163, February.

    Cited by:

    1. Conan Mukherjee, 2020. "On group strategyproof and optimal object allocation," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 8(2), pages 289-304, October.
    2. Youngsub Chun & Manipushpak Mitra & Suresh Mutuswami, 2019. "Recent developments in the queueing problem," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 27(1), pages 1-23, April.
    3. Hagen, Martin, 2023. "Collusion-proof mechanisms for multi-unit procurement," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 281-298.
    4. Sreoshi Banerjee & Parikshit De & Manipushpak Mitra, 2024. "Generalized welfare lower bounds and strategyproofness in sequencing problems," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 63(2), pages 323-357, September.
    5. De, Parikshit, 2013. "Incentive and normative analysis on sequencing problem," MPRA Paper 55127, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Atay, Ata & Trudeau, Christian, 2024. "Queueing games with an endogenous number of machines," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 104-125.
    7. Mitra, Manipushpak & De, Parikshit, 2015. "Incentives and justice for sequencing problems," MPRA Paper 65447, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Banerjee, Sreoshi & De, Parikshit & Mitra, Manipushpak, 2020. "A welfarist approach to sequencing problems with incentives," MPRA Paper 107188, University Library of Munich, Germany.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 1 paper announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-CDM: Collective Decision-Making (1) 2015-02-05
  2. NEP-COM: Industrial Competition (1) 2015-02-05
  3. NEP-GTH: Game Theory (1) 2015-02-05
  4. NEP-MIC: Microeconomics (1) 2015-02-05

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Conan Mukherjee should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.